Tell an opinion you have that is in the strong minority

[Anonymous]

I don't think I should have to tip delivery men if I am charged a delivery fee. Fucking greedy restaurants are getting out of control. Share the delivery fee with your employees!

[Anonymous]

The more rabid the wohm - the worse her marriage

[Anonymous]

I think black people are very self destructive and I'm black, so don't give me this "you're racist..." bullshit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The more rabid the wohm - the worse her marriage

What is a "rabid" WOHM?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The more rabid the wohm - the worse her marriage [/quote
So, so wrong. Love this!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The more rabid the wohm - the worse her marriage

+1

happy people don't spend hours online chastising others who choose different lifestyles

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more rabid the wohm - the worse her marriage

+1

happy people don't spend hours online chastising others who choose different lifestyles

+ 2
So true. Talk about insecure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more rabid the wohm - the worse her marriage

What is a "rabid" WOHM?

One who insists that working is the only choice for mothers, no matter household income, ages of children, needs of children, costs of daycare, total working hours, charitable work done.

[Anonymous]

Abortion is ethically,morally and economically flat out WRONG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Abortion is ethically,morally and economically flat out WRONG.

No one ever mentions the economic side

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more rabid the wohm - the worse her marriage

What is a "rabid" WOHM?

One who insists that working is the only choice for mothers, no matter household income, ages of children, needs of children, costs of daycare, total working hours, charitable work done.

None of the WOHMs were saying that WOH is the only choice. They were giving opinions about SAHMs and SAHMs got their knickers in a twist. But I'm not worried because they have plenty of time to untwist their knickers since they're home all day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more rabid the wohm - the worse her marriage

What is a "rabid" WOHM?

One who insists that working is the only choice for mothers, no matter household income, ages of children, needs of children, costs of daycare, total working hours, charitable work done.

None of the WOHMs were saying that WOH is the only choice. They were giving opinions about SAHMs and SAHMs got their knickers in a twist. But I'm not worried because they have plenty of time to untwist their knickers since they're home all day.

Not only are you a troll, but you're also lying. The "militant" WOHMs on the other thread were most definitely insisting that WOH is the only valid choice for mothers. In their warped world view, staying home with kids is simply not acceptable. Seems to me that the WOHMs also get their knickers in a twist when their life choices are mocked and criticized. But you knew that. You're just trying to stir things up yet again, but on a new thread. Run along and find something useful to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more rabid the wohm - the worse her marriage

What is a "rabid" WOHM?

One who insists that working is the only choice for mothers, no matter household income, ages of children, needs of children, costs of daycare, total working hours, charitable work done.

None of the WOHMs were saying that WOH is the only choice. They were giving opinions about SAHMs and SAHMs got their knickers in a twist. But I'm not worried because they have plenty of time to untwist their knickers since they're home all day.

Not only are you a troll, but you're also lying. The "militant" WOHMs on the other thread were most definitely insisting that WOH is the only valid choice for mothers. In their warped world view, staying home with kids is simply not acceptable. Seems to me that the WOHMs also get their knickers in a twist when their life choices are mocked and criticized. But you knew that. You're just trying to stir things up yet again, but on a new thread. Run along and find something useful to do.

There's one troll insisting that and she is roundly mocked by women who work and women who don't. There's like half a dozen people saying working moms don't raise their own kids, aren't bonded to their kids, causing mental illness and instability ... Read the thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more rabid the wohm - the worse her marriage

What is a "rabid" WOHM?

One who insists that working is the only choice for mothers, no matter household income, ages of children, needs of children, costs of daycare, total working hours, charitable work done.

None of the WOHMs were saying that WOH is the only choice. They were giving opinions about SAHMs and SAHMs got their knickers in a twist. But I'm not worried because they have plenty of time to untwist their knickers since they're home all day.

Not only are you a troll, but you're also lying. The "militant" WOHMs on the other thread were most definitely insisting that WOH is the only valid choice for mothers. In their warped world view, staying home with kids is simply not acceptable. Seems to me that the WOHMs also get their knickers in a twist when their life choices are mocked and criticized. But you knew that. You're just trying to stir things up yet again, but on a new thread. Run along and find something useful to do.

There's one troll insisting that and she is roundly mocked by women who work and women who don't. There's like half a dozen people saying working moms don't raise their own kids, aren't bonded to their kids, causing mental illness and instability ... Read the thread.

Did you read up to the part where sahms were accused of holding back the women's movement?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more rabid the wohm - the worse her marriage

What is a "rabid" WOHM?

One who insists that working is the only choice for mothers, no matter household income, ages of children, needs of children, costs of daycare, total working hours, charitable work done.

None of the WOHMs were saying that WOH is the only choice. They were giving opinions about SAHMs and SAHMs got their knickers in a twist. But I'm not worried because they have plenty of time to untwist their knickers since they're home all day.

Not only are you a troll, but you're also lying. The "militant" WOHMs on the other thread were most definitely insisting that WOH is the only valid choice for mothers. In their warped world view, staying home with kids is simply not acceptable. Seems to me that the WOHMs also get their knickers in a twist when their life choices are mocked and criticized. But you knew that. You're just trying to stir things up yet again, but on a new thread. Run along and find something useful to do.

There's one troll insisting that and she is roundly mocked by women who work and women who don't. There's like half a dozen people saying working moms don't raise their own kids, aren't bonded to their kids, causing mental illness and instability ... Read the thread.

Did you read up to the part where sahms were accused of holding back the women's movement?

Yes and that's stupid. It's a stupid thing to say. And it's a stupid thing to get offended about because the "women's movement" is all but over. You can't compare the abstract comment of "You're setting women back 100 years!!!!1" with "You're a neglectful parent." They are not on the same level at all, period.