Stop bashing the rich

[Anonymous]

http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2012/09/06/stop-bashing-rich/

Great article.

[Anonymous]

Great article if you agree with its conclusions. But to call recognition that there is a disconnect in our economy, where the rich are benefiting and the middle and lower classes are losing ground "bashing the rich" is a craven attempt to draw attention away from the fact that the deck is stacked in favor of the rich. From Reagan to Bush2, there was a concerted effort to bring this about; that was the real class war! And it continues in the Romney-Ryan proposals.

[Anonymous]

I am in the 1% and I don't feel bashed. I feel blessed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am in the 1% and I don't feel bashed. I feel blessed.

I'm far from the 99%, having never had a 6-figure income. But my wife and I are happily retired in the home we have owned for years, along with a place in the country, as compared to the small apartment I grew up in. So I join you in feeling blessed, and am glad to hear a one-percenter on DCUM who is not complainng about the possibility s/he might have to pay a bit more tax on the top bracket of a three or four hundred thousand dollar income.

[Anonymous]

I'll stop bashing them when they stop buying politicians to protect their filthy lucre.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am in the 1% and I don't feel bashed. I feel blessed.

+1.

[Anonymous]

Matthew 20:16

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'll stop bashing them when they stop buying politicians to protect their filthy lucre.

What counts as rich to you? My husband and I are rich lawyers. Neither we nor any other rich lawyers we know have any political access. We just pay huge amounts in taxes and get told we are selfish drains on the economy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'll stop bashing them when they stop buying politicians to protect their filthy lucre.

What counts as rich to you? My husband and I are rich lawyers. Neither we nor any other rich lawyers we know have any political access. We just pay huge amounts in taxes and get told we are selfish drains on the economy.

You pay what you owe (I hope) which is only a lot because you make a lot. That's the price of living in a civilization that affords you the opportunity to become a rich lawyer. If you'd like to reduce your tax bill, quit.

And I never said you were a selfish drain on the economy. That's what the jackass you're probably voting for called my grandma.

[Anonymous]

In the mid 1980s the rich were given tax cuts and then fulfilled their end of the bargain -- unemployment went down.

In the early 2000s, the rich were given tax cuts. Result? An anemic labor market over the past 12+ years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'll stop bashing them when they stop buying politicians to protect their filthy lucre.

What counts as rich to you? MY husband and I are rich lawyers. Neither we nor any other rich lawyers we know have any political access. We just pay huge amounts in taxes and get told we are selfish drains on the economy.

Yuck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'll stop bashing them when they stop buying politicians to protect their filthy lucre.

What counts as rich to you? MY husband and I are rich lawyers. Neither we nor any other rich lawyers we know have any political access. We just pay huge amounts in taxes and get told we are selfish drains on the economy.

Yuck.

Yuck for being honest here, being rich, or being lawyers?

[Anonymous]

For whining because no one appreciates their contributions to the economy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'll stop bashing them when they stop buying politicians to protect their filthy lucre.

What counts as rich to you? My husband and I are rich lawyers. Neither we nor any other rich lawyers we know have any political access. We just pay huge amounts in taxes and get told we are selfish drains on the economy.

Who tells you that you are selfish drains on the economy? The Republicans who blame frivolous lawsuits for the spiraling cost of health care, and who want to solve it by tort reform? Or the Democrats, who believe in increased regulation (good for you) or expansion of access to legal services (good for you)? Maybe you should rethink which side your bread is buttered on.