Sean “Diddy” Combs accused of gang rape of teen girl in new lawsuit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too many excuses for Cassie's demented behavior, which is insulting to real victims of abuse. She names her kid after her so-called "abuser" (???) ... but there's an excuse for that. She FaceTimed her current husband while having sex with Diddy... but there's an excuse for that as well. She arranged most of the freak-offs... but that's just something abused women do?

This is a federal RICO trial. Can you please educate yourself re the charges because each time you post your angst against Cassie you sound dumber and dumber. This isn’t a trial re whether Cassie is an abuse victim. Stop the Diddy PR campaign. Your views on Cassie’s likability as a victim have zero to do with the charges. None.

I'm no Puff Diddly Daddy fan, but did she really facetime her current husband while having se. With Puff Diddly Daddy?

but you work for him, right?

Dp. No but a golddigger is a golddigger abused or not. There was a reason she didn't date a fast food worker.

Hey keyboard warrior. Cassie is not on trial. Who cares if she's a gold digger? She wasn't arrested. It's Diddy. You sound like your feelings are hurt that you weren't invited to these freak offs. Have fun in whatever insane sicko world you live in.

Right, but despite abuse she stayed for other reasons that didn't have to do with the abuse. Yeah, tell cassie about her insane sicko world of swallowing rando craigslist guys she hired pee for marathon orgies and her addiction to voyeurism with diddy including sleeping with diddy in a facetime vid with her husband.

He forced her to do that. Are you aware of the things he did to her when she tried to leave? Oh, I forgot. You do know about that but you have to get your nickel for every post you make supporting that creep.

They were swingers. She dated other men while with Diddy and she also cheated a lot. So did he. Seems like he got pissed off if she didn't tell him who she was dating during their open relationship. He was abusive but she had many opportunities to leave and finally did when he declared Kim Porter his soulmate and flaunted yung Miami around. The money ran out for cassie obviously she moved back to her parents and sued for abuse righr after for the $

That is not what swingers do, and they were not swingers.

It does appear Combs openly had at least 2 additional girlfriends at the same time he dated Cassie, near the end of their romantic relationship.

Cassie certainly knew about these women’s sexual activities with Diddy, and she may have participated in the sex too. Seems like the term “swingers” might fit here too.

And let’s not forget Cassie and Combs together hired the two male escorts together, for the purpose of having them urinate into Cassie’s mouth while Combs watched. That one was clearly consensual on Cassie’s part, because she wanted it to happen to her.

So for this site are you up to $1.10 for making your pro creep posts? C'mon spill. Tell us if you're paid by the word, sentence, or post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clark's testimony is much more damming than Cassie's testimony.

Everyone was excited for Cassie, but this is the good stuff here.

Weird how Clark stayed working for Diddy for over a decade. If a boss threatened to kill me even jokingly in the first day I'd leave the next day. Plenty of jobs that don't involve killing, threats, or abuse. I have had bosses from hell before with one even yelling at me after I quit after calling me in a voicemail.

So you're up to $3.25 in pay so far. It's been explained multiple times that no one leaves Diddy. He attacks and threatens people who try to leave. These are all abusive relationships.

Be honest about who you are and post a pic of yourself - you can leave out your face - in the Free Diddy t-shirt you get $20 to wear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clark's testimony is much more damming than Cassie's testimony.

Everyone was excited for Cassie, but this is the good stuff here.

Weird how Clark stayed working for Diddy for over a decade. If a boss threatened to kill me even jokingly in the first day I'd leave the next day. Plenty of jobs that don't involve killing, threats, or abuse. I have had bosses from hell before with one even yelling at me after I quit after calling me in a voicemail.

So you're up to $3.25 in pay so far. It's been explained multiple times that no one leaves Diddy. He attacks and threatens people who try to leave. These are all abusive relationships.

Be honest about who you are and post a pic of yourself - you can leave out your face - in the Free Diddy t-shirt you get $20 to wear.

Also, everyone who has been threatened by Diddy said they took the threats very seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too many excuses for Cassie's demented behavior, which is insulting to real victims of abuse. She names her kid after her so-called "abuser" (???) ... but there's an excuse for that. She FaceTimed her current husband while having sex with Diddy... but there's an excuse for that as well. She arranged most of the freak-offs... but that's just something abused women do?

This is a federal RICO trial. Can you please educate yourself re the charges because each time you post your angst against Cassie you sound dumber and dumber. This isn’t a trial re whether Cassie is an abuse victim. Stop the Diddy PR campaign. Your views on Cassie’s likability as a victim have zero to do with the charges. None.

I'm no Puff Diddly Daddy fan, but did she really facetime her current husband while having se. With Puff Diddly Daddy?

but you work for him, right?

Dp. No but a golddigger is a golddigger abused or not. There was a reason she didn't date a fast food worker.

Hey keyboard warrior. Cassie is not on trial. Who cares if she's a gold digger? She wasn't arrested. It's Diddy. You sound like your feelings are hurt that you weren't invited to these freak offs. Have fun in whatever insane sicko world you live in.

Right, but despite abuse she stayed for other reasons that didn't have to do with the abuse. Yeah, tell cassie about her insane sicko world of swallowing rando craigslist guys she hired pee for marathon orgies and her addiction to voyeurism with diddy including sleeping with diddy in a facetime vid with her husband.

He forced her to do that. Are you aware of the things he did to her when she tried to leave? Oh, I forgot. You do know about that but you have to get your nickel for every post you make supporting that creep.

They were swingers. She dated other men while with Diddy and she also cheated a lot. So did he. Seems like he got pissed off if she didn't tell him who she was dating during their open relationship. He was abusive but she had many opportunities to leave and finally did when he declared Kim Porter his soulmate and flaunted yung Miami around. The money ran out for cassie obviously she moved back to her parents and sued for abuse righr after for the $

That is not what swingers do, and they were not swingers.

It does appear Combs openly had at least 2 additional girlfriends at the same time he dated Cassie, near the end of their romantic relationship.

Cassie certainly knew about these women’s sexual activities with Diddy, and she may have participated in the sex too. Seems like the term “swingers” might fit here too.

And let’s not forget Cassie and Combs together hired the two male escorts together, for the purpose of having them urinate into Cassie’s mouth while Combs watched. That one was clearly consensual on Cassie’s part, because she wanted it to happen to her.

You're misunderstanding what “swingers” actually are. Swinging is a specific type of consensual non-monogamy where committed couples, often married or long-term partners, mutually agree to engage in sexual activities with other people, typically together or with full transparency. It’s based on consent, equality, and open communication.

Just because a couple is aware of each other's sexual activities outside the relationship, or even involved in group sex, doesn’t make them swingers. The dynamic between Diddy and Cassie was a controlling, abusive relationship. Diddy used manipulation, coercion, and violence to control Cassie, which is the opposite of what happens in a swinger relationship.

Also, the extreme acts you're referencing, whether consensual or not, have nothing to do with swinging. Fetishes or kinks exist across all kinds of relationships, including abusive ones. Using those acts to paint Cassie as a willing participant in a healthy, open relationship ignores the very real power imbalance and abuse that she detailed and which Diddy partially confirmed with a public apology. Also, while on the stand, Cassie testified that she did not want him or anyone to urinate on her.

So no, this wasn’t swinging.

Unless someone had a gun to my head and even then and even if that person was a billionaire like Diddy I would not accept a prostitutes urine or roleplay as a urinal as Cassie did. She definitely liked the sex enough to do it over and over hundreds of times

I get where you’re coming from, most of us can’t imagine ever agreeing to something like that. But that’s exactly the point: when we say “I would never do that,” we’re speaking from the safety of not being in a long-term abusive relationship with someone who has immense power, money, and control over our lives.

Cassie didn’t just randomly “like” extreme sex. She described years of manipulation, threats, surveillance, drug use, and control by someone who was her boss, boyfriend, and the gatekeeper of her career. When someone is being abused and isolated, “consent” gets a lot murkier.

People in abusive situations often stay longer than outsiders think they should, and they sometimes participate in things they don’t actually want to do, because they’ve been worn down, coerced, or they’re trying to survive.

Yes - thank you; that was well-put and I agree with you.

The psychology of people in long term abusive relationships is not easily understood by the majority of people, who are thankfully not in those type of relationships. People like the jurors, who are presumably normal.

But the attorneys can bring in experts on abusive relationships to help explain why Cassie stayed when other people would have presumably left the relationship. Or why she kept going back, even after being struck.

There is also the phenomenon of kink, which most jurors will not understand in the slightest. Rihanna penned a popular song on BDSM, not because it is new or fringe, but because it is far more prevalent in private relationships than most could imagine.

Diddy’s choreographed “freak off” sessions were absolutely kink. To the extent they involved power and submission, they were classic BDSM. Don’t discount the fact that the “S” is directly attributed to the political activist and libertine the Marquis de Sade, who hardly invented sadism, but brought it into popular culture as never before.

There is a strong argument that Cassie wanted all of this, despite how much it might offend your pseudo-feminist sensibilities in 2025.

Hope Diddie is convicted. But I will not be shocked if he’s acquitted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clark's testimony is much more damming than Cassie's testimony.

Everyone was excited for Cassie, but this is the good stuff here.

Weird how Clark stayed working for Diddy for over a decade. If a boss threatened to kill me even jokingly in the first day I'd leave the next day. Plenty of jobs that don't involve killing, threats, or abuse. I have had bosses from hell before with one even yelling at me after I quit after calling me in a voicemail.

So you're up to $3.25 in pay so far. It's been explained multiple times that no one leaves Diddy. He attacks and threatens people who try to leave. These are all abusive relationships.

Be honest about who you are and post a pic of yourself - you can leave out your face - in the Free Diddy t-shirt you get $20 to wear.

So your asinine reasoning is that people stay with abusive bosses for decades because they are threatened? Plenty of people deal with abusive bosses even myself have dealt with abusive bosses in the past who always brought up being fired at any time or sexual harassment on the job is common too and something I've dealt with too. There are laws against that you know and everyone has free will to leave when they want. What these people are trying to do is save their ass from being implicated and jailed with Diddy though they know they were implicated in the rape of minors etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clark's testimony is much more damming than Cassie's testimony.

Everyone was excited for Cassie, but this is the good stuff here.

Weird how Clark stayed working for Diddy for over a decade. If a boss threatened to kill me even jokingly in the first day I'd leave the next day. Plenty of jobs that don't involve killing, threats, or abuse. I have had bosses from hell before with one even yelling at me after I quit after calling me in a voicemail.

It was wild how she kept going back to work for him after having other jobs, and had Bryan Freedman try to get her a job with Diddy as recently as 2024 (the lawyer doing cross was asking her "did you meet with me trying to get a job" lol).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clark's testimony is much more damming than Cassie's testimony.

Everyone was excited for Cassie, but this is the good stuff here.

Weird how Clark stayed working for Diddy for over a decade. If a boss threatened to kill me even jokingly in the first day I'd leave the next day. Plenty of jobs that don't involve killing, threats, or abuse. I have had bosses from hell before with one even yelling at me after I quit after calling me in a voicemail.

You don’t understand? I can’t tell if you’re engaging in simplistic black-and-white thinking, or if you’re being intentionally obtuse about the complexities of human psychology as it relates to trauma, power, coercion, fear. It isn’t a “take this job and shove it” situation when you’re working for one of the most powerful men in music who not only is rich beyond measure, but is dangerous and you’ve witnessed him attempt to kill others and abuse His closest loved ones on a regular basis.

[Anonymous]

Diddy didn't just threaten to kill those he employed, he also threatened their family members too.

Reminds me of an abusive ex I had who threatened to kill my parents and sister if I left him. He didn't just make threats, either. He gave very detailed ways in which he'd do it and how he'd get away with it because he was ex-military and in law enforcement. It was chilling and made me feel so trapped and helpless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clark's testimony is much more damming than Cassie's testimony.

Everyone was excited for Cassie, but this is the good stuff here.

Weird how Clark stayed working for Diddy for over a decade. If a boss threatened to kill me even jokingly in the first day I'd leave the next day. Plenty of jobs that don't involve killing, threats, or abuse. I have had bosses from hell before with one even yelling at me after I quit after calling me in a voicemail.

You don’t understand? I can’t tell if you’re engaging in simplistic black-and-white thinking, or if you’re being intentionally obtuse about the complexities of human psychology as it relates to trauma, power, coercion, fear. It isn’t a “take this job and shove it” situation when you’re working for one of the most powerful men in music who not only is rich beyond measure, but is dangerous and you’ve witnessed him attempt to kill others and abuse His closest loved ones on a regular basis.

Stop being so dramatic. People leave the mafia, so I don't see it why it should be so hard to leave Diddy. People should at themselves and ask why they're so full of cowardice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clark's testimony is much more damming than Cassie's testimony.

Everyone was excited for Cassie, but this is the good stuff here.

Weird how Clark stayed working for Diddy for over a decade. If a boss threatened to kill me even jokingly in the first day I'd leave the next day. Plenty of jobs that don't involve killing, threats, or abuse. I have had bosses from hell before with one even yelling at me after I quit after calling me in a voicemail.

You don’t understand? I can’t tell if you’re engaging in simplistic black-and-white thinking, or if you’re being intentionally obtuse about the complexities of human psychology as it relates to trauma, power, coercion, fear. It isn’t a “take this job and shove it” situation when you’re working for one of the most powerful men in music who not only is rich beyond measure, but is dangerous and you’ve witnessed him attempt to kill others and abuse His closest loved ones on a regular basis.

Agree with the pp. People leave the mafia and there are ex gang members. Women and even celebrities have dated cartel men who are also very rich. So?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Diddy didn't just threaten to kill those he employed, he also threatened their family members too.

Reminds me of an abusive ex I had who threatened to kill my parents and sister if I left him. He didn't just make threats, either. He gave very detailed ways in which he'd do it and how he'd get away with it because he was ex-military and in law enforcement. It was chilling and made me feel so trapped and helpless.

Ok so what do you do in that case? Carry a gun for yourself and file a restraining order. Get support from family. Women leave ex gang members and cartel men and men with bigger connections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clark's testimony is much more damming than Cassie's testimony.

Everyone was excited for Cassie, but this is the good stuff here.

Weird how Clark stayed working for Diddy for over a decade. If a boss threatened to kill me even jokingly in the first day I'd leave the next day. Plenty of jobs that don't involve killing, threats, or abuse. I have had bosses from hell before with one even yelling at me after I quit after calling me in a voicemail.

You don’t understand? I can’t tell if you’re engaging in simplistic black-and-white thinking, or if you’re being intentionally obtuse about the complexities of human psychology as it relates to trauma, power, coercion, fear. It isn’t a “take this job and shove it” situation when you’re working for one of the most powerful men in music who not only is rich beyond measure, but is dangerous and you’ve witnessed him attempt to kill others and abuse His closest loved ones on a regular basis.

Stop being so dramatic. People leave the mafia, so I don't see it why it should be so hard to leave Diddy. People should at themselves and ask why they're so full of cowardice.

Honestly it sounds like all that loyalty bought with money was for material and lifestyle pleasure and the perks of being associated with Diddy.

[Anonymous]

Is anyone else surprised there has been no testimony about his infamous parties? I read a lot about people allegedly being drugged and/or blackmailed for orgies that happened during his White Parties. I thought we’d hear something about those but it doesn’t appear that is a focus in this case.

[Anonymous]

What about Diddy having Tupac Shakur murdered?

Shakur's murder has never been fully solved, although former gang member Duane "Keffe D" Davis was charged in the case last year. Mr Davis, whose trial will begin in March 2025, previously claimed that Mr Combs offered him $1m to kill Shakur.

[Anonymous]

It’s difficult to read this list of accusations by so many different people and still believe P. Diddy is entirely innocent; a misunderstood artist:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c869qd5j09xo

Still, it is undeniable Hollywood absolutely adored this man; showering him with praise, awarding him with producer contracts for MTV shows, paying him to host award shows, etc.

What does that say about our entertainment industry in 2025?