2028 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

Agreed!

Not sure. He's pretty kind to Stars and seems to know a lot about their inner workings.

Who cares. He has been non biased

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

Agreed!

Not sure. He's pretty kind to Stars and seems to know a lot about their inner workings.

Who cares. He has been non biased

I agree which goes against him being a Pride dad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

Agreed!

Not sure. He's pretty kind to Stars and seems to know a lot about their inner workings.

Who cares. He has been non biased

I agree which goes against him being a Pride dad.

But he is intelligent and data driven which argues against being from Stars. Who knows?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

Agreed!

Not sure. He's pretty kind to Stars and seems to know a lot about their inner workings.

Who cares. He has been non biased

The last post is showing the Pride bias, so Pride Dad. Pride played 1 good team in NGLL and lost. They didn’t even play Stars. Somehow they will go on to make the championship?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

Agreed!

Not sure. He's pretty kind to Stars and seems to know a lot about their inner workings.

Who cares. He has been non biased

The last post is showing the Pride bias, so Pride Dad. Pride played 1 good team in NGLL and lost. They didn’t even play Stars. Somehow they will go on to make the championship?

First time in NGLL MDU isn't in playoffs, currently ranked #11 nationally, lost by 2 to the #6 Crush and suddenly they "aren't a good team". You all have real short memories.

[Anonymous]

This is how I feel about the quality of posts on this forum:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is how I feel about the quality of posts on this forum:

You’re saying Data Guy is a horse’s ass?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is how I feel about the quality of posts on this forum:

You’re saying Data Guy is a horse’s ass?

Based on some of the recent analysis and incorrect data, yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is how I feel about the quality of posts on this forum:

You’re saying Data Guy is a horse’s ass?

Based on some of the recent analysis and incorrect data, yes.

Huh? Missing on Hero's vs Coppermine? That was a toss up. What "incorrect data"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is how I feel about the quality of posts on this forum:

You’re saying Data Guy is a horse’s ass?

Based on some of the recent analysis and incorrect data, yes.

Huh? Missing on Hero's vs Coppermine? That was a toss up. What "incorrect data"?

Leave DG alone. He works hard to provide quality analysis and generate positive discussions. I guess we could all go back to discussing Capital tryouts though.

[Anonymous]

Playoffs!

[Anonymous]

What is Stars strategy for taking on Hero's G? Did KJ and BP come up with some new schemes for Saturday?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is Stars strategy for taking on Hero's G? Did KJ and BP come up with some new schemes for Saturday?

Have more goals than HG by end of game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is how I feel about the quality of posts on this forum:

You’re saying Data Guy is a horse’s ass?

Based on some of the recent analysis and incorrect data, yes.

Huh? Missing on Hero's vs Coppermine? That was a toss up. What "incorrect data"?

Leave DG alone. He works hard to provide quality analysis and generate positive discussions. I guess we could all go back to discussing Capital tryouts though.

Yes, coming up soon, much more exciting!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:size may be great to break a tie but lots of "undersized" players. Quickness and speed negate any size issues.

HS mom here. Sadly, my kid was told she was undersized for the colleges she hoped to play at, which is why I mentioned to hope for size. Of course you can’t will it into being but I hope all your girls don’t face the same results my kid did. Size does matter (she is little all around, so maybe a stronger but shorter player would have better luck).

I think most of the people on here are Dads not Moms. I've seen high school coaches shame girls for being too thin or too small. I know 15 year old girls who have told their moms they need to "get big" for lacrosse. Size does matter for D1 college recruiting but at the end of the day there is no money in this and no real career path beyond coaching. When girls become women who suddenly stop training for multiple hours 7 days a week, "getting big" may look less desirable. if you are a parent on here you more than likely had some experience with dating in your past. If you are a middle age person on here you more than likely know how hard it is to maintain a figure the olde you get. I'm just saying....