2028 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:size may be great to break a tie but lots of "undersized" players. Quickness and speed negate any size issues.

HS mom here. Sadly, my kid was told she was undersized for the colleges she hoped to play at, which is why I mentioned to hope for size. Of course you can’t will it into being but I hope all your girls don’t face the same results my kid did. Size does matter (she is little all around, so maybe a stronger but shorter player would have better luck).

What size is your daughter?

Abby Bosco is 5'3

Hanna Davis is a 2024 commited to BC and is listed 5'1 100 lbs.

Are you implying that those two are the norm?

I don't think Izzy Scane is 100 lbs.

Somewhere in the first 60 pages or so this topic was covered extensively. Summary--size and speed can help, especially for defense--not at all dispositive. Almost every top 25 team has players at the shorter/smaller range in meaningful roles. And then Data Guy did a speed study based on UA 150.

Where is this speed study by Data Guy?

p 93

[Anonymous]

Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

Agreed!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:size may be great to break a tie but lots of "undersized" players. Quickness and speed negate any size issues.

HS mom here. Sadly, my kid was told she was undersized for the colleges she hoped to play at, which is why I mentioned to hope for size. Of course you can’t will it into being but I hope all your girls don’t face the same results my kid did. Size does matter (she is little all around, so maybe a stronger but shorter player would have better luck).

What size is your daughter?

Abby Bosco is 5'3

Hanna Davis is a 2024 commited to BC and is listed 5'1 100 lbs.

Are you implying that those two are the norm?

I don't think Izzy Scane is 100 lbs.

Somewhere in the first 60 pages or so this topic was covered extensively. Summary--size and speed can help, especially for defense--not at all dispositive. Almost every top 25 team has players at the shorter/smaller range in meaningful roles. And then Data Guy did a speed study based on UA 150.

Where is this speed study by Data Guy?

p 93

That was very informative. Thank you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

Agreed!

Not sure. He's pretty kind to Stars and seems to know a lot about their inner workings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

Agreed!

Not sure. He's pretty kind to Stars and seems to know a lot about their inner workings.

Who cares. He has been non biased

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

Agreed!

Not sure. He's pretty kind to Stars and seems to know a lot about their inner workings.

Who cares. He has been non biased

I agree which goes against him being a Pride dad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

Agreed!

Not sure. He's pretty kind to Stars and seems to know a lot about their inner workings.

Who cares. He has been non biased

I agree which goes against him being a Pride dad.

But he is intelligent and data driven which argues against being from Stars. Who knows?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

Agreed!

Not sure. He's pretty kind to Stars and seems to know a lot about their inner workings.

Who cares. He has been non biased

The last post is showing the Pride bias, so Pride Dad. Pride played 1 good team in NGLL and lost. They didn’t even play Stars. Somehow they will go on to make the championship?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Data Guy = Pride Dad? Looking like it

Agreed!

Not sure. He's pretty kind to Stars and seems to know a lot about their inner workings.

Who cares. He has been non biased

The last post is showing the Pride bias, so Pride Dad. Pride played 1 good team in NGLL and lost. They didn’t even play Stars. Somehow they will go on to make the championship?

First time in NGLL MDU isn't in playoffs, currently ranked #11 nationally, lost by 2 to the #6 Crush and suddenly they "aren't a good team". You all have real short memories.

[Anonymous]

This is how I feel about the quality of posts on this forum:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is how I feel about the quality of posts on this forum:

You’re saying Data Guy is a horse’s ass?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is how I feel about the quality of posts on this forum:

You’re saying Data Guy is a horse’s ass?

Based on some of the recent analysis and incorrect data, yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is how I feel about the quality of posts on this forum:

You’re saying Data Guy is a horse’s ass?

Based on some of the recent analysis and incorrect data, yes.

Huh? Missing on Hero's vs Coppermine? That was a toss up. What "incorrect data"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is how I feel about the quality of posts on this forum:

You’re saying Data Guy is a horse’s ass?

Based on some of the recent analysis and incorrect data, yes.

Huh? Missing on Hero's vs Coppermine? That was a toss up. What "incorrect data"?

Leave DG alone. He works hard to provide quality analysis and generate positive discussions. I guess we could all go back to discussing Capital tryouts though.