Kennedy Assassination - will we ever know the real story?

[Anonymous]

This is the most studied crime of all time. Yet there has never been a shred of evidence indicating there was a conspiracy. Magic bullet? Some things cannot be scientifically proven and maybe that day is one of them.

After all the movies, theories, and Oliver Stone, wouldn't it be ironic if Oswald was just a kook who hit on the first shot, missed on the second, and got a lucky shot on the third? Or maybe there is some rich guy in Arizona with white hair sitting by a pool who knows the whole story and laughs at all the attempts that the public has made to find out the truth.

And what if that day had never happened? Here is an alternative future: Johnson never gets elected, which leads to Nixon never becoming president. Watergate never occurs, which means Carter does not get elected. And because Carter never enters the Oval House and is so bad, Reagan is just a B movie actor and the ex-governor of California.

[Anonymous]

Does Clinton still get to do it with Monica with a cigar?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does Clinton still get to do it with Monica with a cigar?

Yes because Bush eventually gets elected as he is a moderate, but the economy sours which allows Clinton to win.

[Anonymous]

Abd Clinton begot Bushb Jr. who with Cheney brought the country to the brink of disaster

[Anonymous]

Does anyone still care?

[Anonymous]

Yes, because it was a coup d'état and it forever changed the course of history. It was a tragic event for the Kennedy family and for the United States of America.

Until the motives, participants, enabling events before and after and the long term results of the Kennedy assassination are established, it remains possible that a similar event could again occur which is a frightening thought.

So yes there is at least one person out here who still cares.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, because it was a coup d'état and it forever changed the course of history. It was a tragic event for the Kennedy family and for the United States of America.

Until the motives, participants, enabling events before and after and the long term results of the Kennedy assassination are established, it remains possible that a similar event could again occur which is a frightening thought.

So yes there is at least one person out here who still cares.

A lot of people care, often out of curiosity if nothing more. So far they have blamed the CIA, FBI, Mafia, Castro, Johnson, and the Hunt Brothers. I think it was probably Oswald by himself with possibly the Soviets knowing it was going to happen but not being instrumental in the actual killing. Oswald was nuts to begin with.

[Anonymous]

11:34 -- Are you an Angelina Jolie fan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, because it was a coup d'état and it forever changed the course of history. It was a tragic event for the Kennedy family and for the United States of America.

Until the motives, participants, enabling events before and after and the long term results of the Kennedy assassination are established, it remains possible that a similar event could again occur which is a frightening thought.

So yes there is at least one person out here who still cares.

A lot of people care, often out of curiosity if nothing more. So far they have blamed the CIA, FBI, Mafia, Castro, Johnson, and the Hunt Brothers. I think it was probably Oswald by himself with possibly the Soviets knowing it was going to happen but not being instrumental in the actual killing. Oswald was nuts to begin with.

I know JFK the movie had too many fabrications to be one's legitimate source, but if half of what they say in that film is correct, then to believe Oswald acted alone is akin to saying you believe in the Easter Bunny. How does a shot from behind knock his head backwards and blow off the back of his skull? Exit wounds, from what I've read, are far messier than the entrance wound. Also, with the leaves on the trees you couldn't get a clean site (sight? I'm not really up on my gun lingo) for all three shots.

Also, I've found a strange irony in the fact that the probable conspirators, right wingers, created their absolute nightmare of a country: while the world was already changing, the Kennedy assassination was a hugely destabilizing and traumatic event for America. I don't think the Sixties (the Sexual Revolution, drugs, Civil Rights) would've unfolded in quite the same way had Kennedy gotten to finish out his presidency naturally. I think the people who conspired to kill him hoped that in doing so they would preserve their way of life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, because it was a coup d'état and it forever changed the course of history. It was a tragic event for the Kennedy family and for the United States of America.

Until the motives, participants, enabling events before and after and the long term results of the Kennedy assassination are established, it remains possible that a similar event could again occur which is a frightening thought.

So yes there is at least one person out here who still cares.

A lot of people care, often out of curiosity if nothing more. So far they have blamed the CIA, FBI, Mafia, Castro, Johnson, and the Hunt Brothers. I think it was probably Oswald by himself with possibly the Soviets knowing it was going to happen but not being instrumental in the actual killing. Oswald was nuts to begin with.

I know JFK the movie had too many fabrications to be one's legitimate source, but if half of what they say in that film is correct, then to believe Oswald acted alone is akin to saying you believe in the Easter Bunny. How does a shot from behind knock his head backwards and blow off the back of his skull? Exit wounds, from what I've read, are far messier than the entrance wound. Also, with the leaves on the trees you couldn't get a clean site (sight? I'm not really up on my gun lingo) for all three shots.

Also, I've found a strange irony in the fact that the probable conspirators, right wingers, created their absolute nightmare of a country: while the world was already changing, the Kennedy assassination was a hugely destabilizing and traumatic event for America. I don't think the Sixties (the Sexual Revolution, drugs, Civil Rights) would've unfolded in quite the same way had Kennedy gotten to finish out his presidency naturally. I think the people who conspired to kill him hoped that in doing so they would preserve their way of life.

I could see that but how come there has never been a shred of evidence? People are notoriously bad at keeping secrets.

[Anonymous]

I will never EVER buy the magic bullet theory. It makes absolutely no sense. So, ruling that out...

Someone else was involved, but it was 50 years ago, so anyone involved is likely dead.

Aren't there records that should be released in 15 more years or something?

No, I'm not wearing a tinfoil hat, I promise