AAP should be eliminated as it’s not the path to equity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No it should not. Everyone learns and performs differently. Let the kids have programs that can serve them where they are. AAP not be closed and merit should be considered not deprecated for a closed process to meet quotas.




=Anonymous]I found this article so moving:

https://tcf.org/content/commentary/gifted-talented-programs-not-path-equity/

And the arguments made are so compelling.

Don’t you agree this also applies to the AAP program? Should we find ways to phase it out, and offer the same opportunities to every learner in FCPS ?

There may be arguments to eliminating the Center-based program, but only if the kids who need AAP actually get it in their base schools. Right now, there are lots of reasons why that doesn't happen, including the brain drain that occurs due to the LIV center program itself, the failure to provide the same level of rigor and the same teacher certifications in LLIV, the so-called "cluster" model, etc. However, kids should still have to meet some testing requirements in order to qualify for advanced instruction. Each child should have the opportunity to qualify, but it's not realistic or advisable for all of them to get the same level of instruction. There are loads of kids with LD, below grade level, etc. They are not going to qualify for AAP, and the watered down AAP that we have in FCPS is the division's way of meeting the state statutory requirement.