Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My take is someone inside Trump's circle flipped and gave Wray a golden ticket. A consequence of destroying government documents is losing the ability to run for office. The GOP establishment does not want Trump to run again and they don't want him running against Desantis in a drawn out primary. Most of all though they don't want him running as an independent.

Not sure I agree with all of this but if there’s a major mole like this it’s Meadows.

[Anonymous]

Doug Jones gives a good explanation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Does everyone else not remember when the National Archives retrieved classified documents from Mar A Lago, and referred the case to the DOJ?

+1 There were some that were so classified/sensitive that officials couldn’t even describe them to the court. That’s a BFD. No paywall - https://wapo.st/3ddeewM

If they left empty handed, they may have been at MAL to confirm that a transmission did indeed originate from that location. Not all evidence is physical.

Thread of all the Post’s coverage of the 15 boxes of documents found at Mar-A-Lago:

[Anonymous]

I wonder what #DarkBrandon has planned for tomorrow. He’s on a roll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Does everyone else not remember when the National Archives retrieved classified documents from Mar A Lago, and referred the case to the DOJ?

+1 There were some that were so classified/sensitive that officials couldn’t even describe them to the court. That’s a BFD. No paywall - https://wapo.st/3ddeewM

If they left empty handed, they may have been at MAL to confirm that a transmission did indeed originate from that location. Not all evidence is physical.

Explain?

It's not that hard. An example is that to prosecute someone for child porn they do a search warrant to confirm the devices and address the porn was transmitted from. If secret documents were transferred, they may be looking at devices and access. I can think of several cases where "the FBI took nothing." Usually, they take computers but often they just download from the device. If the inventory from the search warrant is released, it will be easy to interpret. Usually in a case that will go to a grand jury it's not released. Don't make the mistake of thinking nothing was discovered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Does everyone else not remember when the National Archives retrieved classified documents from Mar A Lago, and referred the case to the DOJ?

+1 There were some that were so classified/sensitive that officials couldn’t even describe them to the court. That’s a BFD. No paywall - https://wapo.st/3ddeewM

If they left empty handed, they may have been at MAL to confirm that a transmission did indeed originate from that location. Not all evidence is physical.

Explain?

It's not that hard. An example is that to prosecute someone for child porn they do a search warrant to confirm the devices and address the porn was transmitted from. If secret documents were transferred, they may be looking at devices and access. I can think of several cases where "the FBI took nothing." Usually, they take computers but often they just download from the device. If the inventory from the search warrant is released, it will be easy to interpret. Usually in a case that will go to a grand jury it's not released. Don't make the mistake of thinking nothing was discovered.

Or planted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:🍿🍿🍿
If you are found guilty of willfully violating the statute regarding removal or destruction of government documents you are no longer eligible to hold federal office.

This does not apply to the president.

I"m really tired of Elias. He undeniably did great stuff during Donnie's attempted insurrection. But if you've been following Elias, he really over-extended in court in voter rights litigation in 2021 and because of him, SCOTUS is probably going to gut voters right even further.

I don't doubt he's a great lawyer - but he's too #VeryOnline for my taste. I finally stopped following him because it was clear some of the stuff he was saying was completely crazy...and I didn't think it was a good look for a senior lawyer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has anything like this ever happened before?

[Anonymous]

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, candidate for Arkansas Governor made a statement:

[Anonymous]

Minority Leader threatens Federal agents and The A.G. I think he forgot he's the MINORITY leader. Clear your calendar indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”

Example: the pardon of Nixon emboldened Republican politicians to think they could get away with crimes without punishment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Weird timing for Biden to do this…. Now all media attention going to be on this raid (and IRA, abortion coverage gone).

Biden doesn't "do this" you moron.

Takeaway: Do not mess with NARA!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Does everyone else not remember when the National Archives retrieved classified documents from Mar A Lago, and referred the case to the DOJ?

+1 There were some that were so classified/sensitive that officials couldn’t even describe them to the court. That’s a BFD. No paywall - https://wapo.st/3ddeewM

If they left empty handed, they may have been at MAL to confirm that a transmission did indeed originate from that location. Not all evidence is physical.

Explain?

It's not that hard. An example is that to prosecute someone for child porn they do a search warrant to confirm the devices and address the porn was transmitted from. If secret documents were transferred, they may be looking at devices and access. I can think of several cases where "the FBI took nothing." Usually, they take computers but often they just download from the device. If the inventory from the search warrant is released, it will be easy to interpret. Usually in a case that will go to a grand jury it's not released. Don't make the mistake of thinking nothing was discovered.

Or planted.
“Or planted”? Seriously??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Weird timing for Biden to do this…. Now all media attention going to be on this raid (and IRA, abortion coverage gone).

Biden doesn't "do this" you moron.

Biden’s FBI.

Who hired Wray? Trump did.

You obviously don’t know how these things work.

As I said two posts preceding, Trump hired him. Duh.

But Biden is the big man on campus now. Everyone is under him. Keep up.

Ummm no. Biden is a crisis actor who was installed until rightful king trump can be restored to his thrown upon the command of Q after Mike Pence’s body is separated from his head.

Keep up.

They still haven't figured out that Biden is JFK Jr!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Weird timing for Biden to do this…. Now all media attention going to be on this raid (and IRA, abortion coverage gone).

"Biden" didn't do this.