I work with the public and most signatures are basically scrawls anyway. Some do block letters and there's no issue. But a signature is totally different from a full knowledge of cursive. |
| Actually, for my child with learning issues around spelling and writing, adding it to his iep in 3rd grade was such a success he worked his worked his way through all iep goals and only had a 504 through high school. Graduating and probably only using 504 |
| Ability to read/write cursive will be an educational flag for the next generation. Fortunately, Montessori still teaches print first, and then also cursive. |
Agree this for many children. |
I work with teens everyday, they just scribble something - some variation of first letters and a scribble - same as 90% of the adults I know who learned cursive in school. |
| I just don't get these parents who don't understand the value of cursive. Not everything is done on the computer anymore, and cursive is easier and faster to write than block print. My 4th grader has learned cursive in school and now primarily uses cursive to write. With Benchmark, the kids are doing a lot more writing, so it's beneficial to be able to write more quickly. |
Make time - 15 min, 2x/wk. |
Emerging research is showing exactly the opposite. |
First statement is utter hogwash. Your second statement explains your lack of knowledge and factually incorrect information. |
They kept telling us this in school and as someone who learned both, I don't buy it. I'm an old school millennial who took notes mostly by hand up through college and I ended up note taking mostly in print. |
First off, you can sign however you want and it's perfectly valid as a legal signature. For most legal documents these days I'm signing with a mouse or a finger on a touchpad. You can't even read it if you try to write that in cursive. Print is perfectly valid for signatures and should be the standard anyway because it is more legible. |
Source? I call BS. Articles/papers written to get clicks from boomers is more like it. |
dp. There are benefits of cursive. https://extension.ucr.edu/features/cursivewriting |
Au contraire - “One compelling reason for the revival of cursive writing is its cognitive benefits. Research suggests that learning cursive can enhance brain development, particularly in areas related to language, memory, and fine motor skills. When students engage in the intricate movements required for cursive writing, this activates different parts of the brain compared to typing or printing. This stimulation can improve neural connectivity and contribute to overall cognitive growth, aiding students in various academic pursuits.” From the folks at UC Riverside - https://extension.ucr.edu/features/cursivewriting |
The "research" article you posted only links to a blog about handwriting that bases their opinion on a different Norwegian study, which states that "handwriting" shows increased brain activity in a certain region over typing or using a touchscreen. Printing would also be handwriting, but they purposefully didn't test that (or didn't include it because it doesn't support their narrative). None of these "cursive is beneficial" articles are anything more than someone trying to make their opinion look like science. |