So, you may want to read my previous comments as it looks like you may have not. Yes, this is sketchy because: 1. There was no review of this paperwork or program. It was a form sandwiched between all the forms on the clipboard. No mention of extra billing or cost. The list of services are the same as any patient, so there is no indication of this being an "excepted" set of services. For those just subscribing to Medicare- it looks like they are confirming that Medicare is primary biller. 2. We do not require month to month, non face to face services. They call in a prescription or confirm a drugstore request 2x a year for spouse. None for me. They do not manage any of our chronic conditions. At all. We do yearly wellness visits only, spouse went in 2 x in Feb, saw 2 different PAs. No doctor. 3. We have **premium** secondary insurance, one of the best in the region and country, for which we pay a lot. They refuse to pay this secondary fee after Medicare. Zilch. Medicare only paid a small fraction of this fee. Now the practice is billing us the remainder. We owe $300 total for Jan,Feb, and March. I see there will be another 100 due for April. So $1200 a year for doctors we do not see, services we do not have. What? We might as well join a concierge practice, for more $$ if we are going to have to do it. I think concierge practices compound the problem, but here we are. How is this not sketchy again? I mean, it's apparently not Medicare fraud, obviously there was a law passed to do it. But, yes, it's unethical and I think fraudulent. I am being billed for services I do not receive. |
Oh my goodness. You are just being obtuse in response to multiple posters who have gone out of their way to explain something that isn't even that complicated. |
You are the same poster saying the same thing, with zero comprehension. Just cannot read, apparently. |
| Sounds like these practices are betting on some idea that over 65s are doddering old fools and wouldn't figure this out. This makes me want to forgo taking Medicare later and just stay with my insurance. Better for everyone involved. |
not the same poster. You are the one not comprehending the concept.
|
+1000 |
|
DP I understand that practices want to be reimbursed for time spent reviewing charts, etc. for situations like a patient calling in for X reasons, and I understand that this program is not fraudulent, but something about it feels off and like taking advantage (in the negative sense) of what is technically allowed.
|
Yes, agree. |
|
OP, why are you going to this provider's office for yearly visits, if there is no need for you to do so? |