Is this bag frumpy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's a classic style. Never really in or out.

Really tired of people calling everything "basic". One, that's dated slang. Two, it actually means a person that follows the crowd and copies other people who are more well known/ popular than them. A sheep. Someone who is only interested in the mainstream, or what's popular.

That hardly describes the bag unless you're using it as a sub for classic.

*nods in your direction while standing and clapping*

[Anonymous]

If you're shorter than 5'7 it will look frumpy.

[Anonymous]

I don't like it.

[Anonymous]

Do we need a new thread every time you see a new Longchamp bag?

[Anonymous]

It's a packhorse saddlebag.

[Anonymous]

No. It's not frumpy.

It's a nice bag. As a PP notes, it's pretty basic. But not frumpy.

[Anonymous]

I said it was basic above, and I didn’t mean that in a bad way. It’s just a normal bag, nothing special. It will work with many outfits as long as you like it.

[Anonymous]

It's not frumpy. It's stupid, ugly, contemporary, and yes, I'm judging you if you carry it. LOOK at it. It's a big triangle and nothing more. Go buy an elegant, nice handbook.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't call it frumpy but it looks awkward. The handle is too short to carry it on your shoulder, but it's too big for a hand bag. Like it's trying to be in-between and just fails at both size options.

This. Crossbody bags forever.