Scoir Data - Adjusting Reach/Target/Likely

Anonymous
Our private uses weighted but also grades on a 1-100 scale not 4.0 scale.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:According to our CC, Naviance is updated during the final 2 weeks of July. Why it takes so long is beyond me.


Is this true for everyone? It looks like ours just added new data in the first page with “average GPA/test scores” but the scattergrams haven’t changed (yet?)
Anonymous
Our Naviance still hasn’t updated. Just venting. Anyone else in same boat?
Anonymous
Follow the data for your school IF you are full pay (or close) AND considered a domestic US applicant.

Slacs are frequently need-aware and some get a lot of international applicants, for whom admission is typically tougher (and even need blind schools may be need aware for international students).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Our Naviance still hasn’t updated. Just venting. Anyone else in same boat?


Ours updated in early June.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:According to our CC, Naviance is updated during the final 2 weeks of July. Why it takes so long is beyond me.


Is this true for everyone? It looks like ours just added new data in the first page with “average GPA/test scores” but the scattergrams haven’t changed (yet?)


Ours did.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Our private uses weighted but also grades on a 1-100 scale not 4.0 scale.


What would be an A+ in an AP class on the 100 scale?
Anonymous
Anyone else still waiting for Naviance to update 2025 results? Why so long the wait?
Anonymous
We are still waiting. Counselor says “sometime in late July.”! Not helpful.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else still waiting for Naviance to update 2025 results? Why so long the wait?


Ours seems to get updates in dribs & drabs as students get accepted. It’s a terrible system. I am unclear if the colleges, our school counselors or students themselves input the data. It’s a messy, incomplete program. We have students who matriculate to specific universities and it’s never reflected in Naviance.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:We are still waiting. Counselor says “sometime in late July.”! Not helpful.

Do you really need to pinpoint it to a specific day in the coming week? A few days will make that big a difference for you?
Anonymous
FYI:
If there are outliers to the data from last cycle, it’s probably not relevant to you (unless your kid is also an outlier). It’s rare for there to be giant shifts or swings from year to year in the gpa/test data if they are not substantiated by something specific to the candidate’s profile.

My ‘25 kid was an outlier and got into several reach schools test optional. Had a talent/ability (evidenced by national individual accolades and awards) that certain schools were actively looking for (institutional priorities).

We didn’t know it at the time when applying, but came to find out after the fact. So that test data could be an outlier.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:For our private, according to CCO, in RD the following SLACs had a 55-80% admit rate:

Colgate for anyone with a 3.7+uw;
Davidson (assuming some Dem interest) for 3.75uw+;
Hamilton for 3.75uw;
Bucknell for 3.55uw.
Denison for 3.7uw
Wesleyan for 3.8uw.

SLACs like their feeder private high schools.


Surprised that Denison is that high. I would have thought it would have been lower considering the GPA required of the other schools. Or has Colgate really fallen that much in desirability?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For our private, according to CCO, in RD the following SLACs had a 55-80% admit rate:

Colgate for anyone with a 3.7+uw;
Davidson (assuming some Dem interest) for 3.75uw+;
Hamilton for 3.75uw;
Bucknell for 3.55uw.
Denison for 3.7uw
Wesleyan for 3.8uw.

SLACs like their feeder private high schools.


Surprised that Denison is that high. I would have thought it would have been lower considering the GPA required of the other schools. Or has Colgate really fallen that much in desirability?


At our private, Colgate has fallen a lot too.
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: