This is precisely why I wouldn’t disclose. We all know that there are plenty of students at all these schools (and at non-SN private schools too) with ASD who do just fine. When schools discriminate on the basis of a label without bothering to dig any deeper to figure out whether the student can be successful, they are asking for the omission. As parents, it’s important that we be honest with ourselves about the type of environments in which our kids can be successful. But I sure as hell wouldn’t trust a school to care enough to make that call when it’s so much easier for them just to reject. |
I wouldn’t say there are “plenty”of students with ASD at these schools. There are just a few. A larger number get rejected or counseled out. |
I'm a current Lab parent and the bolded above is bizarre to me. It sounds utterly delusional. Where on earth did you get that information? From the staff? |
Yes, said during an online open house. |
Most of those have ADHD which is very common among people with dyslexia. |
I can speak for McLean only. Definitely not full of disruptive ADHD kids, especially in the older grades. As a whole, I’d call the kids quirkier or less mature than their peerset, but skewing more typical than not. The kids who are less adept socially tend to leave for whatever reason. Same goes for kids with very mild ADHD and/or no learning concerns. It really caters to kids who might fall through the cracks in public school but generally behave/interact fairly typically. |
| How could you not disclose when these schools require a neuropsych report? Just curious. |