The mechanism is inbuilt with a trustee. Ours is a bank. The co-parent would go to the bank with a reasonable request for XX expenses for the kids. If the trustee (bank) deems it reasonable, they get the money. |
Ex does not get anything. Too bad. Of course the children will be richer than the estranged parent, who cares? |
I’d be really hesitant to set this up. The ex is going to take advantage. |
Whaat? Why can't old have a trust fund? It can be set up for the kid, pay for college, a down payment on a house etc... |
If your husband were abusive as you say, your kids deserve pity too. Money doesn't solve the trauma they lived. It will be there forever. I'm one of those kids amd yes I feel sorry for kids who experience what I went through. BtW my parents don't see my trauma and now I don't talk to them, so be careful in how you deal with your own rich kids. Money doesn't fix your bad parenting. |
Banks are actually very strict about this, which is why I didn't select a family member. I think family is more likely to take advantage and an entity that will never benefit. Plus they are used to these situations, where people try to steal money from kids. |
No only no but Hell no! You are divorced and former inlaws owe you zero! In fact, they should include something that prohibits you from profiting in any way from the trust. |
I disagree with this poster about using a bank employee as a Trustee, but I do think the answer is that the beneficiary spouse needs to be really thoughtful about who they name as an independent trustee, if they have that power. Because the ex spouse in most cases can request distributions for the benefit of the minor that can go directly to the parent, and in many cases the Trustee will have broad discretion. Which isn’t necessarily bad. But you might not want it to be your brother in law. |
What the heck is an ex-children in law? The grandparent is creating a trust for his adult child and his grandchildren. And why is the OP even asking about it. It’s the grandfather’s decisions to make and I can’t imagine him putting the ex-spouse in as a beneficiary. That’s nuts. |
+1 |
How did your parents address if something happens to kids keeping ex out bc if something happens to kids the ex is part of next of kin and would benefit. |
I’m not the previous poster but this is really really easy to address. The family trust is set to benefit the grandchildren. If the grandchildren die, then it would go to their closest blood relatives. Even if the ex spouse successfully murdered his exwife, his children and their grandparents and aunts and uncles, the family trust would go to the next closest blood relative. Probably a second cousin twice removed or something similar. There is no scenario where the ex-spouse gets the trust. |
Agree. My husband's family didn't put me in either. I asked them not to - the reason is everything should go to their grandkids. I didn't put DH in the trust I set up for my kids either - why? I'm independently wealthy and he doesn't need my money either. |
I know of several situations where the kids have a significantly higher net worth than their parent due to trusts from their grandparents. No, an ex-spouse does not get an inheritance from someone who is no longer related to them just so that his ego isn’t bruised that his kids have more money than he does. |
Why on earth would the ex be a beneficiary? You are greedy and crazy. |