Another advisor. Agree. Both great schools and lovely campuses. Each unique with many different aspects in terms of campus, curriculum, financial aid, strength areas, etc. |
They do offer these, but they don't "blow away" Lafayette. You clearly don't know much about engineering programs. Few students are interested in the 3-2. Lafayette would be a much stronger draw for a potential engineer. |
Dual degree=we don’t have engineering so transfer to Dartmouth after two years and pay for five years of undergrad! That’s not an engineering program |
I'd add Bucknell. |
Bucknell is too jock,frat bro centered. |
No one else would. It isn’t a prestigious liberal arts college and is in a dump of a town. Maybe great for rich white kids with daddy’s money |
| Both are ivy league, rich prep rejects. So it doesn't matter. |
| Lafayette is more pre-professional than Wesleyan. Wesleyan is a more “out there” liberal arts-focused place with more over the top rich folks. There is plenty of wealth at Lafayette too, but Daddy is more likely to be a C-suite exec or business owner instead of an entertainment industry professional. |
I think you got it backwards. The wealthy c suite execs are the ones with the capital to send their kids to Wesleyan to get arts degrees. |
| Wesleyan is a great school, despite the fact that kids there skew heavily to the wealthy/private school demographic. This is in part due to the low endowment, which forces Wesleyan to pick up lots of full-pay kids, etc. But it's a very good school and has a strong reputation in my field at least, and in my wife's (I'm an academic in the humanities, she is a writer). I think the demographics there obscure to some extent how good the school is, if that makes sense. |
Are we talking about the same institution with a $1.7 billion endowment for just 3,000 students? They keep the high private school/ wealthy crowd out of greed, not necessity |
|
DD is considering Lafayette. I keep reading it’s a little fratty/bro-y, but what are the female students like?
DD is super into sports, both playing and watching. She’s academically interested in history and policy/politics/government. Leans progressive but is not at all political or activist in personality. (Steering clear of schools that attract a protest-oriented student body.) Oh, and she grew up in a suburb of a small, down to earth, midwestern city. Excellent public school with lots of rigor, but no experience with the more elite/sophisticated NYC/DC crowd. Open to hearing about the female student body at Wesleyan, too. Our hunch is it’s not a fit, but that’s just a guess at this point. |
|
There are plenty of legitimate reasons like school culture, specific opportunities, or major why you might prefer one over the other. But when you ask a broad question like "better," it's hard not to go to the basic stats.
Wesleyan is much more selective (under 20%) than Lafayette (over 30%) and has a more high-performing applicant pool. Use CDS to compare the number of students who submit scores to see how different the populations are: Wesleyan enrolled first-year SATs (25th%-75th%) are: 1300-1500 with roughly 71% of them submitting scores. Lafayette enrolled first-year SATs (25th%-75th%) are: 1350-1470 with roughly 45% of them submitting scores. "Better" is really about fit and is very subjective. But reputationwise, selectivity, performance of applicants, Wesleyan is definitely a cut above Lafayette. |
| They both are in blue collars cities. |
In the grand scheme of things, and especially using the SAT score metric, these schools are about the same. "This school is 1300-1500 and that school is 1350-1470, so obviously the former is definitely a cut above the latter." Puhleaze.
|