| I would keep 1 tub. You won't get that much storage for the space and it is a resale consideration. My whole family enjoys baths, would never consider a house without any. |
|
Do it. Tubs are not necessary. And in 10 years your 1950s house is probably a tear-down, no offense. Have the bathroom you want.
Having a tub "for the kids" is a weird DCUM thing, and short-sighted given most people will be in their home for decades. It's easier to wash infants in the sink, and a kid who can sit up or stand can wash in a shower or use a Rubbermaid bin as a mini tub inside the shower. |
| I like taking a bath at least once a week. |
| I’m a tub person, but in my former neighborhood of 1940’s brick box houses, more and more people started getting rid of the tubs to replace them with large, new, updated showers. I think people at that price point want updated and luxurious more than they need a tub. So I don’t think getting rid of a tub would per se be the problem. But I do think getting rid of one of your two upstairs bathrooms entirely to add closet space is not a good idea, bc you’ll be putting your house in a lower price range for comps when it’s time to sell. |
| I don’t care about tubs. They are mostly useless. Do it. It won’t hurt resale. |
I have a cast iron tub and it’s 14” tall. It’s a glorified shower pan to me. How anyone took a bath I’m not sure. It’s leaving this weekend. |
| Hard no. We have family and friends that like to take baths or have young children who take baths. |
|
Bathtubs are overrated. My house with no tubs sold for more than a similar house in the neighborhood with tubs. A nice shower beats a bathtub all the time.
|
| I would not turn a full bath into a half in favor of a closet. That is crazy talk. |
| I wouldn't buy it without a tub, however, you live there and plan to be there for some time to come so you should remodel the house to suit your existing needs not mine. |