DCUM's running NRA GUN ADVERTISING Appropriate?

[Anonymous]

Click on any gun related post and NRA Gun rights, Carry permit rights, Shooter training, etc. banners appear. Just started this weekend
A monument to poor taste in my opinion.
Please discuss

[Anonymous]

But aren't the ads automatically served up when a related word is "spotted"?

[Anonymous]

It's the way google advertising works, you twit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's the way google advertising works, you twit.

Was that really necessary? You just had to add that, didn't you.

[Anonymous]

It depends on the type of pages that you visited recently - so if you visited articles on gun control, on the shootings, etc.... this is why you see the NRA add.

I was doing extensive search yesterday for maternity clothes, so my running ads are actually for pea in the pod, zulilily, viacord, and not sure why Jeep.

[Anonymous]

Everyone has the right to get their message across. I don't like them but the second amendment defined a a constitutional right and they serve a valid political purpose in advocating for it.

[Anonymous]

I should add that it is dangerous to create a site where a point of view is excluded. That's the fix news problem IMO. Those that watch it and nothing else miss a lot.

[Anonymous]

Fox not fix.

[Anonymous]

OP Here.
I am not perceived by those who know me, report to me, or are my superiors as a TWIT. Nor am I a NERD, who is familiar with Google marketing techniques. So much for solphmoric, infantile Label's
I still perceive, be it Google, or DCUM's failure to filter out this advertising, at this moment in time, as a monument to poor taste.

[Anonymous]

When you rush to judgement about a perceived situation without any critical thinking or research, you are an alarmist at best, or at very least, a twist. Take your pick.

[Anonymous]

A twit....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When you rush to judgement about a perceived situation without any critical thinking or research, you are an alarmist at best, or at very least, a twist. Take your pick.[/quote

Judgment. No e. I don't usually play spelling police, but this word is constantly misspelled on these forums.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everyone has the right to get their message across. I don't like them but the second amendment defined a a constitutional right and they serve a valid political purpose in advocating for it.

I don't agree with that statement. They advocate for continued sale of weapons that serve no purpose other than to kill lots of people, usually many innocent people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you rush to judgement about a perceived situation without any critical thinking or research, you are an alarmist at best, or at very least, a twist. Take your pick.[/quote

Judgment. No e. I don't usually play spelling police, but this word is constantly misspelled on these forums.

Actually it can be spelled either way.

http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/judgement.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everyone has the right to get their message across. I don't like them but the second amendment defined a a constitutional right and they serve a valid political purpose in advocating for it.

The OP is asking about appropriateness not legality.