Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everyone who said there was no way she would have done that Thanksgiving miscarriage column unless she was already pregnant again were so right and 100 percent called it. Announcing that on one holiday, and this on another, also seems to be excessively attention-manipulating, too.

That was me and several others. You are right about the attention-seeking and manipulating, too, with that picture on Valentine's Day. Why the need to announce at all? Aren't they privacy-seeking private citizens now?

They are very annoying and I was a supporter a while back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Divorce will have to wait. She’s pregnant again!

https://www.eonline.com/news/1083203/meghan-markle-is-pregnant-expecting-baby-no-2-with-prince-harry

This is actually hilarious because there was just a story on friday on how Kate convinced Will to have a fourth child. Guess the Cambridge’s found out end of last week.

Yep. They always rush to announce something that isn't even in the works if something big happens with the Sussexes. Like what? My wife and I are thinking, planning, possibly moving forward with the act of conceiving. Really?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys know fertility clinics don’t just do IVF, right? An IUI with meds at Shady Grove worked just fine for me in my late 30s.

Nobody is talking about you, Karen.

MM is north of 40 and photographed leaving a fertility clinic this summer. Her last in person event was late August. It’s reasonable to assume she went on lockdown once she knew she was pregnant.

Sounds sensible to me. There is a pandemic going on.

Google says her last public spotting was August 21. Do the math.

Photographed outside a fertility clinic in mid/late July.

Okay. So you think she was pregnant in August? Wouldn't that make the baby due in April? She does not look ready to give birth in April. She was much further along with Archie around this time period.

Maybe.

She looks pretty pregnant for an otherwise skinny woman obsessed with her weight. Look at her thighs under the dress. I’d say April or May.

No way. She does not look that far along. Also add to it that many women look bigger sooner second pregnancy. She got much bigger than this last time.

[Anonymous]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.etonline.com/meghan-markle-reveals-shes-six-months-pregnant-due-at-the-end-of-april-117340%3famp

She’s 6 mos here, and barely showing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone who said there was no way she would have done that Thanksgiving miscarriage column unless she was already pregnant again were so right and 100 percent called it. Announcing that on one holiday, and this on another, also seems to be excessively attention-manipulating, too.

That was me and several others. You are right about the attention-seeking and manipulating, too, with that picture on Valentine's Day. Why the need to announce at all? Aren't they privacy-seeking private citizens now?

They are very annoying and I was a supporter a while back.

Huh? Everyone I know is a private citizen and announced their pregnancy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone who said there was no way she would have done that Thanksgiving miscarriage column unless she was already pregnant again were so right and 100 percent called it. Announcing that on one holiday, and this on another, also seems to be excessively attention-manipulating, too.

That was me and several others. You are right about the attention-seeking and manipulating, too, with that picture on Valentine's Day. Why the need to announce at all? Aren't they privacy-seeking private citizens now?

They are very annoying and I was a supporter a while back.

Would you prefer they just popped up in July with a 2nd baby? OMG the stories about 'secret adoption' would never end. There's also the fact that Prince Harry is legally obligated to inform both the Queen and the Prince of Wales about a new member of the royal family. Sorry they don't live in your boring world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone who said there was no way she would have done that Thanksgiving miscarriage column unless she was already pregnant again were so right and 100 percent called it. Announcing that on one holiday, and this on another, also seems to be excessively attention-manipulating, too.

That was me and several others. You are right about the attention-seeking and manipulating, too, with that picture on Valentine's Day. Why the need to announce at all? Aren't they privacy-seeking private citizens now?

They are very annoying and I was a supporter a while back.

Huh? Everyone I know is a private citizen and announced their pregnancy.

Yep my friends couldn't shut up about theirs. But Meghan + Harry should never announce anything happy ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone who said there was no way she would have done that Thanksgiving miscarriage column unless she was already pregnant again were so right and 100 percent called it. Announcing that on one holiday, and this on another, also seems to be excessively attention-manipulating, too.

That was me and several others. You are right about the attention-seeking and manipulating, too, with that picture on Valentine's Day. Why the need to announce at all? Aren't they privacy-seeking private citizens now?

They are very annoying and I was a supporter a while back.

Would you prefer they just popped up in July with a 2nd baby? OMG the stories about 'secret adoption' would never end. There's also the fact that Prince Harry is legally obligated to inform both the Queen and the Prince of Wales about a new member of the royal family. Sorry they don't live in your boring world.

Yes I would actually. This picture is ridiculous. There is informing and then there is ADVERTISING

[Anonymous]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/gmp24112951/meghan-markle-baby-bump-pregnancy/

Her bump, month by month.

We don’t know when the picture was really taken BTW.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone who said there was no way she would have done that Thanksgiving miscarriage column unless she was already pregnant again were so right and 100 percent called it. Announcing that on one holiday, and this on another, also seems to be excessively attention-manipulating, too.

That was me and several others. You are right about the attention-seeking and manipulating, too, with that picture on Valentine's Day. Why the need to announce at all? Aren't they privacy-seeking private citizens now?

They are very annoying and I was a supporter a while back.

Would you prefer they just popped up in July with a 2nd baby? OMG the stories about 'secret adoption' would never end. There's also the fact that Prince Harry is legally obligated to inform both the Queen and the Prince of Wales about a new member of the royal family. Sorry they don't live in your boring world.

Yes I would actually. This picture is ridiculous. There is informing and then there is ADVERTISING

Advertising what? Love? The two of them alone? In their yard? WTF is your problem.

[Anonymous]

Peers at the picture. What are they advertising PP? Like seriously. She's wearing no jewelry except her wedding ring. Harry isn't even wearing shoes.

Trees maybe. They're starting a horticulture farm!

[Anonymous]

There is so much hate directed at this couple. I don’t get it. Is it jealousy? Racism? Why do so many people love to hate on Meghan and Harry?

It’s a lovely photo. Congrats to them!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone who said there was no way she would have done that Thanksgiving miscarriage column unless she was already pregnant again were so right and 100 percent called it. Announcing that on one holiday, and this on another, also seems to be excessively attention-manipulating, too.

That was me and several others. You are right about the attention-seeking and manipulating, too, with that picture on Valentine's Day. Why the need to announce at all? Aren't they privacy-seeking private citizens now?

They are very annoying and I was a supporter a while back.

Would you prefer they just popped up in July with a 2nd baby? OMG the stories about 'secret adoption' would never end. There's also the fact that Prince Harry is legally obligated to inform both the Queen and the Prince of Wales about a new member of the royal family. Sorry they don't live in your boring world.

Yes I would actually. This picture is ridiculous. There is informing and then there is ADVERTISING

Advertising what? Love? The two of them alone? In their yard? WTF is your problem.

NP: They’re advertising joy and love. Perhaps the PP doesn’t recognize what that can look like.

[Anonymous]

Congrats to them! They look so happy and at peace in the picture. Also explains the stories of Meaghan not going to England this summer for some of the big celebrations the royals have planned.

I’m assuming the baby will be born in the States? 8th in line to the throne will be an American citizen. If a boy, they should name him Ralph just to mess with everyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Congrats to them! They look so happy and at peace in the picture. Also explains the stories of Meaghan not going to England this summer for some of the big celebrations the royals have planned.

I’m assuming the baby will be born in the States? 8th in line to the throne will be an American citizen. If a boy, they should name him Ralph just to mess with everyone.

This is pretty historic. First British blood royal born in the United States. Although I think the 7th in line for the throne is already a American citizen.