Protesters outside of Tucker Carlson's house

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

So you're fine with terrorizing children, as long as they're conservatives' children?

Tucker’s kids aren’t really children - all are older than 15. Plus, they aren’t even home. They are away at boarding school(s) and college(s).

Ok, then. It's OK to terrorize conservatives' children as long as they are at least 16? Do you have a limit on the other end? OK to terrorize elderly as long as they are under 85?

Why is it acceptable to terrorize anyone?

No one on this thread has said this is “ok.”

Some of us don’t really care, because Tucker is sort of vile. But we welcome police investigating and enforcing the law in this case.

Wrong. Plenty of you have shown your true colors and very much said this is "ok." As if there was ever any doubt.

Where? You say it’s in the thread, go ahead and post a quote.

Do your own dirty work. Start on page one of this thread and keep going. You people are disgusting.

Liar. No one said it was "ok". DP.

I should report you for calling me a liar, but instead I'll just prove you wrong. Have a great day and try to stop lying and blaming others for your own issues. This was just through page 5:

That’s not how it works. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

This is what happens when you sell your soul as a propagandist. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

It seems just deserts for Carlson after profiting by spreading many half-truths and hate.

Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

He expects to be treated with the courtesy he routinely denies others. His actions have consequences.

That's my take as well. He encourages violent behavior and feeds hate through the spread of half-truths. I have little sympathy for him.

The country is in a constitutional crisis, I can’t really spare concern for one dipshit getting his comeuppance from a bunch of other dipshits.

Terrorizing? LOL.

But to answer your question, I would not be one out there. And I don't like it. But, he invited it. His wife should be taking him to task for putting their family in the spotlight with his BS, conspiracy theories, accusations, and incivility. Once he does that, he would have a shred of sympathy from me. As it is, he doesn't.

Thank you.
Libs are peddling a propaganda machine here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

So you're fine with terrorizing children, as long as they're conservatives' children?

Tucker’s kids aren’t really children - all are older than 15. Plus, they aren’t even home. They are away at boarding school(s) and college(s).

Ok, then. It's OK to terrorize conservatives' children as long as they are at least 16? Do you have a limit on the other end? OK to terrorize elderly as long as they are under 85?

Why is it acceptable to terrorize anyone?

No one on this thread has said this is “ok.”

Some of us don’t really care, because Tucker is sort of vile. But we welcome police investigating and enforcing the law in this case.

Actually, a bunch of people on this thread have said that it is ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Still not one quote showing how Carlson is "horrible".
You lying lib losers.

There was a link to an article about Carlson's horribleness, and you saw it.
You're the lying loser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still not one quote showing how Carlson is "horrible".
You lying lib losers.

There was a link to an article about Carlson's horribleness, and you saw it.
You're the lying loser.

Still can't find one single "horrible" Carlson quote?
Ha!Ha!Ha!Ha! You silly, hateful fools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still not one quote showing how Carlson is "horrible".
You lying lib losers.

There was a link to an article about Carlson's horribleness, and you saw it.
You're the lying loser.

Still can't find one single "horrible" Carlson quote?
Ha!Ha!Ha!Ha! You silly, hateful fools.

The quotes are in the aforementioned article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still not one quote showing how Carlson is "horrible".
You lying lib losers.

There was a link to an article about Carlson's horribleness, and you saw it.
You're the lying loser.

Still can't find one single "horrible" Carlson quote?
Ha!Ha!Ha!Ha! You silly, hateful fools.

The quotes are in the aforementioned article.

If so, please share just one here. Thank you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still not one quote showing how Carlson is "horrible".
You lying lib losers.

There was a link to an article about Carlson's horribleness, and you saw it.
You're the lying loser.

Still can't find one single "horrible" Carlson quote?
Ha!Ha!Ha!Ha! You silly, hateful fools.

The quotes are in the aforementioned article.

If so, please share just one here. Thank you!

Just read it. Don't be a lazy bum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
This is what happens when you sell your soul as a propagandist. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

It seems just deserts for Carlson after profiting by spreading many half-truths and hate.

Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

He expects to be treated with the courtesy he routinely denies others. His actions have consequences.

That's my take as well. He encourages violent behavior and feeds hate through the spread of half-truths. I have little sympathy for him.

The country is in a constitutional crisis, I can’t really spare concern for one dipshit getting his comeuppance from a bunch of other dipshits.

Terrorizing? LOL.

But to answer your question, I would not be one out there. And I don't like it. But, he invited it. His wife should be taking him to task for putting their family in the spotlight with his BS, conspiracy theories, accusations, and incivility. Once he does that, he would have a shred of sympathy from me. As it is, he doesn't.

Exactly. Thank you!

Bottom line - these people are exercising their first amendment rights and it is a direct consequence of Carlson's own actions for which he needs to take personal responsibility.

[Anonymous]

Look y'all,
Not one single quote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

So you're fine with terrorizing children, as long as they're conservatives' children?

Tucker’s kids aren’t really children - all are older than 15. Plus, they aren’t even home. They are away at boarding school(s) and college(s).

Ok, then. It's OK to terrorize conservatives' children as long as they are at least 16? Do you have a limit on the other end? OK to terrorize elderly as long as they are under 85?

Why is it acceptable to terrorize anyone?

No one on this thread has said this is “ok.”

Some of us don’t really care, because Tucker is sort of vile. But we welcome police investigating and enforcing the law in this case.

Wrong. Plenty of you have shown your true colors and very much said this is "ok." As if there was ever any doubt.

Where? You say it’s in the thread, go ahead and post a quote.

Do your own dirty work. Start on page one of this thread and keep going. You people are disgusting.

Liar. No one said it was "ok". DP.

I should report you for calling me a liar, but instead I'll just prove you wrong. Have a great day and try to stop lying and blaming others for your own issues. This was just through page 5:

That’s not how it works. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

This is what happens when you sell your soul as a propagandist. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

It seems just deserts for Carlson after profiting by spreading many half-truths and hate.

Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

He expects to be treated with the courtesy he routinely denies others. His actions have consequences.

That's my take as well. He encourages violent behavior and feeds hate through the spread of half-truths. I have little sympathy for him.

The country is in a constitutional crisis, I can’t really spare concern for one dipshit getting his comeuppance from a bunch of other dipshits.

Terrorizing? LOL.

But to answer your question, I would not be one out there. And I don't like it. But, he invited it. His wife should be taking him to task for putting their family in the spotlight with his BS, conspiracy theories, accusations, and incivility. Once he does that, he would have a shred of sympathy from me. As it is, he doesn't.

All of those comments just said that they aren't surprised that it happened because TC is such a sh1thead. And they don't really care. That doesn't mean they condone violence. Not that there was any actual violence in this situation...

As it stands, you are still a liar.

[Anonymous]

I agree with pp. none of those quotes say that this is ok, just expected. Tucker is reaping a hysterical environment that he helped to create.

[Anonymous]

If you attempt to break down my front door
when I'm home alone, that IS violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I agree with pp. none of those quotes say that this is ok, just expected. Tucker is reaping a hysterical environment that he helped to create.

What quote can you provide to support your (false) accusation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Terrible.
I know this is a small minority of activists but their behavior should be called out. People should not be accosted in restaurants, in their homes or when they are “off the clock”

That’s not how it works. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Above is just one of the many evil posts by a Liberal.
Shame on you all!

For you, 9:55, you liar.

DP. 9:55 spoke the truth.

There's such a pattern here. When libs can't accept the truth, they say "liar."

(I was called a liar for complaining that leftists marched through my neighborhood at 9 pm screaming "F borders".)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
This is what happens when you sell your soul as a propagandist. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

It seems just deserts for Carlson after profiting by spreading many half-truths and hate.

Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

He expects to be treated with the courtesy he routinely denies others. His actions have consequences.

That's my take as well. He encourages violent behavior and feeds hate through the spread of half-truths. I have little sympathy for him.

The country is in a constitutional crisis, I can’t really spare concern for one dipshit getting his comeuppance from a bunch of other dipshits.

Terrorizing? LOL.

But to answer your question, I would not be one out there. And I don't like it. But, he invited it. His wife should be taking him to task for putting their family in the spotlight with his BS, conspiracy theories, accusations, and incivility. Once he does that, he would have a shred of sympathy from me. As it is, he doesn't.

Exactly. Thank you!

Bottom line - these people are exercising their first amendment rights and it is a direct consequence of Carlson's own actions for which he needs to take personal responsibility.

Sorry, friend, they are not “exercising their first amendment rights.” Their first amendment rights do not include breaking the front door of a citizen, spray painting their driveway, or vandalizing their car with spray paint. In fact, their first amendment rights do not include invading his private property.
These people are not protesters. They are a destructive mob.
The fact that you folks condone this is abhorrent. The police are investigating it as a possible hate crime. Yes, crime. Don’t justify their actions.