Nicole Shanahan says RFK Jr. campaign considering joining forces with Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about reproductive rights? That is the critical issue of this election. Why is he joining forces with the destructor of Roe?

Maybe because when looking at abortion, there is another human life who also has rights, and who should not be killed. Funny how pro choicers constantly talk about women's rights, but conviently ignore the rights of the human lives inside the women, half of whom are also females.

No one is having their "reproductive rights" taken away. You still have the right to reproduce. But not the right to take away human life.

Like typical "prolifers", you only care about the life from conception till birth.
After that, f' em, they're on their own.

Great logic: "I care about kids after they are born, so that means I am allowed to support the killing of kids before they are 'born'!"

dp.. so you agree that you don't really give AF about the kids once they are born.

At least Walz put his money where his mouth is by ensuring all school aged children have food while in school. What have MAGAts done about kids going hungry in school?

It's not about supporting your right to do what you want. It's about supporting *MY OWN RIGHT* to do what I want, and for my DD, as well. It's none of your dam* business what I or my DD does with our bodies. Stay out of our uterus.

I care about the rights and uteruses of the female babies you are killing. It is sad that you don't.

[Anonymous]

Annie Kennedy that fails to launch just uses their family name to hold on to 15 or 16 minutes of fame.... It's just too bad he's doing it at the expense of the American people his dad fought so hard for

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Annie Kennedy that fails to launch just uses their family name to hold on to 15 or 16 minutes of fame.... It's just too bad he's doing it at the expense of the American people his dad fought so hard for

Any Kennedy

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

The 8% for rfk will definitely help trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This guy is not very bright. Can't even follow a basic press conference and logic. And FYI, he is removing his name ONLY in the swing states, not the other way around. Duh.

[Anonymous]

Nepos Unite!

[Anonymous]

How is this not quid pro quo?



Just shows you how desperate Trump actually is

[Anonymous]

It’s over for Harris after this. Trump is going to get a 3-4 point bump in all the battleground states, especially Wisconsin and Michigan. He was pulling 4-6 points in places like NH, where him dropping out is going to put Trump within the MOE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The 8% for rfk will definitely help trump

Most of them were in states Trump was already going to win.

[Anonymous]

I mean do we think the people that were going to vote for him are honestly going to go to the polls now and vote for Trump or are they just going to stay home?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Unfortunately they don’t have any voters.

RFK does.

Not any more.

You didn’t listen to his speech.

He’s staying on the ballot in non battleground states

He’s asking his voters to select Trump in battleground states. He is having his name removed.

This is a brilliant tactic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about reproductive rights? That is the critical issue of this election. Why is he joining forces with the destructor of Roe?

Maybe because when looking at abortion, there is another human life who also has rights, and who should not be killed. Funny how pro choicers constantly talk about women's rights, but conviently ignore the rights of the human lives inside the women, half of whom are also females.

No one is having their "reproductive rights" taken away. You still have the right to reproduce. But not the right to take away human life.

Like typical "prolifers", you only care about the life from conception till birth.
After that, f' em, they're on their own.

Great logic: "I care about kids after they are born, so that means I am allowed to support the killing of kids before they are 'born'!"

dp.. so you agree that you don't really give AF about the kids once they are born.

At least Walz put his money where his mouth is by ensuring all school aged children have food while in school. What have MAGAts done about kids going hungry in school?

It's not about supporting your right to do what you want. It's about supporting *MY OWN RIGHT* to do what I want, and for my DD, as well. It's none of your dam* business what I or my DD does with our bodies. Stay out of our uterus.

I care about the rights and uteruses of the female babies you are killing. It is sad that you don't.

You have every right to care. You have no right to interfere in someone else's medical situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This guy is not very bright. Can't even follow a basic press conference and logic. And FYI, he is removing his name ONLY in the swing states, not the other way around. Duh.

That’s all that’s needed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s over for Harris after this. Trump is going to get a 3-4 point bump in all the battleground states, especially Wisconsin and Michigan. He was pulling 4-6 points in places like NH, where him dropping out is going to put Trump within the MOE.

The people supporting RFK are mostly people who didn't want to vote for Trump or Biden. Thinking that all of these voters will gravitate to Trump is misguided.