Actors' strike
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
PP from above, adding -- the earlier PP talking about promotion is right, too. I read today that one reason (well, among many) that "The Marvels" movie likely was such a huge flop is because no one could promote it in any way before it premiered, no interviews, no talk show appearances, no promo events, etc. I expect we might see that cast out trying to hit the late night shows and entertainment chat circuit very hard to try to get someone to see that movie before it disappears. Actors working other projects about to come out are going to do double-time to promote in upcoming weeks, I'm sure. I'm looking forward to the new "Percy Jackson and the Olympians" series on Disney+ and figure we'll see a big blitz for that. Disney must have been sweating bullets in concern that the strike would go on long enough to affect that expensive series' debut promotions! If you saw interviews with actors during the strike period, note that those were done before the strike began or were for productions which were allowed to film and promote under waivers from the union. That's my understanding at least. I did see quite a few promo interviews during the strike with clear labels on them saying "Interview was conducted before the SAG-AFTRA strike" etc. |
Anonymous
Figured the streamers would do that and blame it on the new contract. Yet the strike threw the spotlight onto how vast the streamers' profits are, in detail, streaming service by streaming service. The streamers are going to gouge, then whine that the contract creates costs they must pass on to viewers. I'll pay it, because I know a couple of actors who actually are in that group where they can't quite make enough in a year to qualify for union health insurance! But there was never any question that the streamers would do this. And they'll still make huge profits.... |