Roy Moore the Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Two*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I (a person with no stake in the game) was willing to believe Allred’s client until his attorney claimed he wasn’t even a DA the year he signed the yearbook. He was the assistant district attorney.

Was he the Assisstant District Attorney the year he signed the year book? Why would he sign the yearbook, D.A. If he was the Assistant D.A.? Did he have an assistant in 1999 whose initiLs were D.A.? If Ms. Nelson had his signature in 1999 on her divorce papers where his assistant also signed the decree with their initials, isn’t this verifiable?

Roy Callahan said the IRS uses a process to test the date of the ink to test whether or not receipts are backdated. This is verifiable.

If these facts are verified, someone lied. Someone needs to be held accountable. This is only the beginning.

My heart goes out to the people of Alabama.

He became deputy DA in 1977. Of course he could have signed DA at that point.

You really want to grasp at straws on THIS issue? Really? Man, even Sean Hannity has given up on this guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

He groped a 28 yo. Nice to know he was also attracted to adult women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

[Anonymous]

More Moore accusations (involving women who worked st Sears). Southern Gothic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everyone knows the WaPo hate runs deep.
They'll do anything for sure.

I mean even if a thousand women were to come forward, the WaPo could be behind all 1000. Right?

[Anonymous]

The man just ain’t right (allegedly).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

[Anonymous]

We need a few recent allegations.

[Anonymous]

Married when she was 16. Ugh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone knows the WaPo hate runs deep.
They'll do anything for sure.

I mean even if a thousand women were to come forward, the WaPo could be behind all 1000. Right?

What’s 1000 x $5000 - $7000 per story?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

Good points and questions to ponder.
Looking forward to the responses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

A 28-year old courting a 15 year old? Better check the statutory rape laws and statutes of limitations in that state.

And it’s not a he said, she said. It’s he said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said. No doubt more women are going to come out. Why should anyone believe Moore? He has a reason to lie. None of the women have a reason to lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

Good points and questions to ponder.
Looking forward to the responses.

I think one of Moore's victims put it best:

"All these years, I thought that was an isolated incident. Now, as a mother and a grandmother, it just makes me physically sick. I realize that it didn't just happen to me."

[Anonymous]

Let's see.... Moore's opponent was trailing by 9 points.
The stakes are high!