EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-asks-brad-pitt-end-the-fighting-drop-winery-lawsuit-8679562

Angelina is trying to play the victim once again, acting as if Brad is the one who is in the wrong for suing her for breaching their agreement. She is the one who sold her share of the winery to a competitor behind his back and then wants to play the victim after she got sued.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13648745/brad-pitt-refusing-lawsuit-angelina-jolie-miraval.html

Luckily, Brad is standing strong and has rejected her latest ploy. He is right that she is pleading for the case to be dropped because she knows her position is weak. She’s tried to turn a business dispute into a nasty personal fight about her abuse allegations, because her case is weak. Brad sounds like he is confident he can get damages from her in court. She I’ll finally have to face the music for her disgusting conduct.

https://www.scribd.com/document/750296352/Sta

Brad’s position against her latest motion to get his personal communications with his closest advisors about the plane incident and his therapy program is strong. Her motions have no relevance to the case. His lawyers are right that a contract can only be considered unconscionable and against public policy at the time it was formed, not as a later justification for refusing to adhere to the contract. It sounds like Angelina’s irrelevant motions will soon be denied by the judge and she will eventually lose the case in court.


We already know Jolie is broke. She must know she is losing the lawsuit if she is having her lawyer publicly beg Brad to drop it. That and she is trying to polish her victimhood crown that she and her followers have adorned her with. She sold the winery to a partner that Brad didn’t want to be in business with, yet somehow she wants us all to believe that she is the victim. She is the instigator of all of the fighting. She went scorched Earth when she left Brad - leaking about the plane incident and filing for sole custody/refusing to let him have custody of his children. She has some nerve claiming that she wants the family to heal when she is the architect of the ugly divorce and can’t let the family heal by endlessly bringing up the plane incident.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The kids are dropping his name. Something happened in their upbringing to necessitate this. They’re mostly over 18 now and less influenced by their mother.
I mean, read the room. He did something unforgivable.


No. All the children have a codependent relationship with Angelina. Even the older boys. Other than the girl in college, none of the kids seem to be able to leave their mother’s home or establish their own lives.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Another example of Jolie trying to resurface the plane incident. What does that have to do with the current case regarding Miraval?


https://www.unilad.com/celebrity/news/brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-intrusive-demands-350-million-lawsuit-180509-20240715


it has everything to do with the Miraval case. Negotiations broke down because of the papers she filed about in family court.


Angelina claims her deal with Brad broke down because Brad wanted her to sign an NDA saying that no one involved in the sale would disparage each other in public. Yet, she also claims she never had any intention of publicly speaking about the so-called abuse. If she never intended to speak about the abuse, why was the NDA a so-called dealbreaker for her? Her lawyer supposedly proposed the same NDA to Brad in connection with their divorce case. The NDA defense is a smoke screen. She found a buyer who would pay her more money for her shares and she wanted to hurt Brad by selling her shares to someone else. She is a malicious and manipulative liar. I’m glad Brad is calling out her BS and continuing in with his court case. It’s high time she is held accountable for her conduct.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She was back in the news yet again today complaining. How has the public not just cut her off already.


They have. She’s irrelevant these days. Her career is basically over. She can barely be hired for a movie role.

How is her career over? The woman just won a Tony award.
Unfortunately, Hollywood is ageist. Many of the female Hollywood stars in Jolie's age range are not getting the call for movies and have begun developing their own projects for the small screen, for example Bullock, Kidman, and Roberts latest roles were all Netflix related and not big screen Hollywood.



She hasn’t made a solid film in like 25 years, lol. She’s long been relegated to the dvd discount bin at the dollar store.


You mean films like “Original Sin” and “Taking Lives” aren’t classics that future generations will watch?

She was a glorified “B” movie Queen in her prime. She can barely find a studio to hire her now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She’s been disturbed a long time. Good PR covered that up but I remember her early days with Billy Bob and the necklace with blood in it that she wore.

Interesting, Billy Bob wore an identical necklace with AJ's blood in it, but people only criticize the woman. How misogynistic most of you posters are. Billy Bob's blood necklace is never mentioned. Only Angelina's. More importantly, it wasn't a vial of blood but a simple smear of each other's blood to remain close when they are apart. People who use this necklace as an excuse to use for not liking Angelina, do you have this same distaste for people who have their deceased love one's ashes turned into jewelry and wear the jewelry.
https://www.businessinsider.com/billy-bob-thornton-angelina-jolie-blood-necklaces-marriage-2018-6


She’s crazy. She checked herself into a mental institution. She hired a hit man to kill herself. She publicly made out with her brother. She’s nuts.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She was back in the news yet again today complaining. How has the public not just cut her off already.


They have. She’s irrelevant these days. Her career is basically over. She can barely be hired for a movie role.

How is her career over? The woman just won a Tony award.
Unfortunately, Hollywood is ageist. Many of the female Hollywood stars in Jolie's age range are not getting the call for movies and have begun developing their own projects for the small screen, for example Bullock, Kidman, and Roberts latest roles were all Netflix related and not big screen Hollywood.



She hasn’t made a solid film in like 25 years, lol. She’s long been relegated to the dvd discount bin at the dollar store.


You mean films like “Original Sin” and “Taking Lives” aren’t classics that future generations will watch?

She was a glorified “B” movie Queen in her prime. She can barely find a studio to hire her now.

What exactly causes you to be so hateful? Is it only towards women, or are you a hateful, depressed, and narcissists person who only gets a fraction of self-esteem by tearing others down?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She was back in the news yet again today complaining. How has the public not just cut her off already.


They have. She’s irrelevant these days. Her career is basically over. She can barely be hired for a movie role.

How is her career over? The woman just won a Tony award.
Unfortunately, Hollywood is ageist. Many of the female Hollywood stars in Jolie's age range are not getting the call for movies and have begun developing their own projects for the small screen, for example Bullock, Kidman, and Roberts latest roles were all Netflix related and not big screen Hollywood.



She hasn’t made a solid film in like 25 years, lol. She’s long been relegated to the dvd discount bin at the dollar store.


She's been in all the Maleficent movies...
Anonymous
She’s not my favorite person. But I don’t fault her for not wanting to sign some BS NDA.
Anonymous
She looks horrible of late. She did not age well. But women generally don't.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She was back in the news yet again today complaining. How has the public not just cut her off already.


They have. She’s irrelevant these days. Her career is basically over. She can barely be hired for a movie role.

How is her career over? The woman just won a Tony award.
Unfortunately, Hollywood is ageist. Many of the female Hollywood stars in Jolie's age range are not getting the call for movies and have begun developing their own projects for the small screen, for example Bullock, Kidman, and Roberts latest roles were all Netflix related and not big screen Hollywood.



She hasn’t made a solid film in like 25 years, lol. She’s long been relegated to the dvd discount bin at the dollar store.


You mean films like “Original Sin” and “Taking Lives” aren’t classics that future generations will watch?

She was a glorified “B” movie Queen in her prime. She can barely find a studio to hire her now.

What exactly causes you to be so hateful? Is it only towards women, or are you a hateful, depressed, and narcissists person who only gets a fraction of self-esteem by tearing others down?


Even Sony doesn’t want to work with her.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She’s not my favorite person. But I don’t fault her for not wanting to sign some BS NDA.


I think it’s standard practice.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She’s not my favorite person. But I don’t fault her for not wanting to sign some BS NDA.


I thought she was the one with the BS NDAs?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She’s not my favorite person. But I don’t fault her for not wanting to sign some BS NDA.


I think it’s standard practice.


Yup, standard part of contacts. That’s why she doesn’t want to produce her documents with the NDAs she has signed or asked others to sign.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The kids are dropping his name. Something happened in their upbringing to necessitate this. They’re mostly over 18 now and less influenced by their mother.
I mean, read the room. He did something unforgivable.


No. All the children have a codependent relationship with Angelina. Even the older boys. Other than the girl in college, none of the kids seem to be able to leave their mother’s home or establish their own lives.


That's BS. For none of his kids to want to see him and some dropping his name? Kids are smarter and more perceptive than you think. Brad bears esponsibility for much of their alienation.
Anonymous
I think she sold Miraval because he took the model there for a weekend. Spiteful and revenge on all fronts!
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: