Why dont the GOP super PACS bring back the birther issue too? we havent beaten that to death enough I think.
Good use of all those millions of dollars to appeal the the mouth breathing sector of the electorate who were already not voting for obama. |
Wright is a wierdo..like ayers ... dorn...Obamas father....Obamas step (dog eating) father...
all of which helps explain why he has so many anti-american views and policies. |
Hmm. Ok, I'll bite. Please explain what anti-american views he has??? |
|
Ahhh ok them being "weirdo's" is why the electorate should care about these people.
thanks for clearing it up. |
It's not really Obama's fault that he is so anti american. He has been influenced by radicals and enemies of the constitution. Many of which appear to have goetten him into college, PAID FOR HIS COLLEGE, and set him up politically. we will never get to see his grades, read his term papers or know who paid for his college because it is probably very disturbing. |
better yet, lets concede that rev wright, ayers, and all of obama's anti-white friends are at the white house doing coke and ready to eat dog tonight for dinner. what policy proposals has obama put forward that supports that obama is racist, socialist, and wants to turn america into a muslim country? dont provide speeches and quotes from his books. what exactly has obama proposed as legislation that supports these associations are dangerous to this country? he had 2 years of dem control of the house and senate so there was plenty of time for him to ram through this agenda. what are they? |
Obama's views are, obviously, identical to those of Rev. Wright, because if you ever attend(ed) a church/synagogue/mosque of any kind, you obviously agree 100% with everything the preacher/rabbi/imam ever said.
And Rev. Wright is, on the basis of the one and only video clip anyone has ever seen of him, clearly a virulent anti-American in that he exercised his 1st Amendment rights to voice an opinion against American policy, on one issue, once. Ergo, ipso facto, the President is also anti-American. No further evidence needed. |
redistributin of wealth by government coersion/force. this would be quite anti-american and the opposite of limited government that built the greatest country in history. Big goverment has been around forever and always fails. small goverment is a gran experiment that has worked awesome but Obama and his type are going to ruin it and turn us into tired old socialist failures. |
i dont like indian food, so i just never go to indian restaurants nor would i be interested in managing an indian restaurant and try to turn it into an italian spot.
i would think it would be the same way, if i was anti-american. not sure why i would try to be the leader of the US if i hated the country so much. seems like it would be easier to move out the country than it is to run for president and try to make turn the country to my liking. just a thought..... |
i dont like indian food, so i just never go to indian restaurants nor would i be interested in managing an indian restaurant and try to turn it into an italian spot.
i would think it would be the same way, if i was anti-american. not sure why i would try to be the leader of the US if i hated the country so much. seems like it would be easier to move out the country than it is to run for president and try to make turn the country to my liking. just a thought..... |
Right off the bat...Obamacare...which of course will be shown to be unconsititutional and therefore anti-american. |
forcing the catholic church to pay for birth control. is as socialist as you get. |
so because healthcare may be found to be unconstitutional, that makes it anti-american?
try reading the history of the supreme court because im pretty sure that if healthcare is overturned, it wont be the first law found unconstitutional by the supreme court. just a hunch. and if we want to follow the logic than lets label every president's whose laws were found unconstitutional anti-american also. which option sounds best for you? |
Your grasp of political theory, in particular the definition of socialism, is a little loose. And by a little loose, I mean it's completely freakin' wrong. Not "I disagree with your analysis" wrong, but "the words don't mean what you think they mean" wrong. |