s/o As for the "highly intelligent parent community", that is really not an important factor at all.

[Anonymous]

One poster wrote, "As for the "highly intelligent parent community", that is really not an important factor at all" regarding Inspired Teaching. I do not agree at all. The parents being highly intelligent will influence the school and will have an impact on the school.

[Anonymous]

What are the stats on "highly intelligent" people?

[Anonymous]

IT may have some intelligent parents but no more than other charters or WOP schools (probably less).

[Anonymous]

FWIW the one IT family I know are crazy smart and quirky.

[Anonymous]

I don't care as long as they are nice and involved. It'll be interesting to have a poll of what colleges are represented in the parent population at our charter just for fun. Today I saw a license plate saying alumna that was from the same seven sisters college I attended.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:IT may have some intelligent parents but no more than other charters or WOP schools (probably less).

I agree and I am an IT parent. However, I don't believe OP's s/o was intended to be IT specific but rather a poll of whether high intelligence amongst the community of families at your school was important to you.

[Anonymous]

I am the person you are quoting, OP, and the reason that I posted that is very simple. Every parent community thinks they are "highly intelligent" and made of awesome.

There is no possible way to measure this, or judge this, and asserting it is simply not good enough.

Ergo, it is unimportant because it is a silly thing to assert.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:IT may have some intelligent parents but no more than other charters or WOP schools (probably less).

I have no idea about the comparative intelligence of parents at various charters, but I am pretty sure you aren't the best judge. Fewer, not less.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am the person you are quoting, OP, and the reason that I posted that is very simple. Every parent community thinks they are "highly intelligent" and made of awesome.

There is no possible way to measure this, or judge this, and asserting it is simply not good enough.

Ergo, it is unimportant because it is a silly thing to assert.

Which means you are the same poster who suggested it would be much better to make a decision regarding your child's education based on the rantings of posters on an anonymous forum then to actually go to the school and talk to parents and teachers eye to eye, watch the children at play, get a feel for the environment and make your own determination.

[Anonymous]

There is a very fine line. Intelligence can often accompany entitlement which can be detrimental for a public school. My personal opinion is that many negative posts about various schools come from "intelligent" parents that think they know more than teachers and staff. There are more adjectives that I find more important when assessing parents of a school. Compassionate, involved, and motivated are some that come to bind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FWIW the one IT family I know are crazy smart and quirky.

Aw, thanks!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:IT may have some intelligent parents but no more than other charters or WOP schools (probably less).

What's a WOP school?

[Anonymous]

West of the park?

[Anonymous]

Which means you are the same poster who suggested it would be much better to make a decision regarding your child's education based on the rantings of posters on an anonymous forum then to actually go to the school and talk to parents and teachers eye to eye, watch the children at play, get a feel for the environment and make your own determination.

Apparently, your reading comprehension skills are lacking.

The OP was looking for parents who were unsatisfied with IT. Someone, you perhaps, suggested they go to Family Fun Day. I doubt she will find unhappy parents at Family Fun Day. Whether she will find them on anonymous message board, I can't say. But I certainly didn't see any "rantings" on that thread. None here either, except, of course, from you.

Do us both a favor and dial back your outrage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am the person you are quoting, OP, and the reason that I posted that is very simple. Every parent community thinks they are "highly intelligent" and made of awesome.

There is no possible way to measure this, or judge this, and asserting it is simply not good enough.

Ergo, it is unimportant because it is a silly thing to assert.

Which means you are the same poster who suggested it would be much better to make a decision regarding your child's education based on the rantings of posters on an anonymous forum then to actually go to the school and talk to parents and teachers eye to eye, watch the children at play, get a feel for the environment and make your own determination.

My theory: The immediate PP is working to ruin IT's reputation by simultaneously working to offend as many people as possible in all threads related to IT, and asserting that the presence of DCUM controversy related to any school is proof that the school is a "failure."

I think we're all smart enough to see through it. But PP, if that isn't your plan, you may want to take a long break from DCUM, lest you undermine the reputation of the school you claim to adore.