Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did the judge say No files unless there is a whole new investigation? Is that what is happening?

What’s happening is this, which was predicted by this lawyer and many others days ago when they first floated this idea. It’s pretend transparency.

[Anonymous]

Trump never had any expectation they’d release the files. This is no coincidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Haven’t been home to watch the new yet but do they even care about the whole Obama Russia Interference thing? It seems like none of the distractions are sticking.

Crazy MAGAs dig that distraction but it’s not working for sane people. Also eventually they’ll face the same issue as they do now when they won’t actually be able to indict Obama & Co. because their claims are full of sh!t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the judge say No files unless there is a whole new investigation? Is that what is happening?

What’s happening is this, which was predicted by this lawyer and many others days ago when they first floated this idea. It’s pretend transparency.

PP again, here’s a very similar explanation with a link, and from a MAGA lawyer. They were never going to get this stuff, if they want to actually be transparent they would release the stuff they actually have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did the judge say No files unless there is a whole new investigation? Is that what is happening?

The judge mearely blocked grand jury testimony which has to be locked. That has nothing to do with the files under Bondi's purview at DOJ.

[Anonymous]

The Trump admin is being attacked from the inside and they don’t know what to do. If Murdoch turns off the MAGA fox propaganda hose it’s going to be a problem for the admin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump never had any expectation they’d release the files. This is no coincidence.

The grand jury testimony is not "the files"

"the files" can be released any time.

[Anonymous]

At a recent event Tulsi Gabbard bragged about how the IC now has AI that can help them very quickly redact and declassify documents.

They ripped through 240,000 MLK documents, redacted, declassified and released.

There is absolutely no reason why they can't do the same with the Epstein files. They are covering up. They need to release what they have. The AI can be used to redact information about the victims, but they absolutely need to expose the criminals and we need them held accountable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At a recent event Tulsi Gabbard bragged about how the IC now has AI that can help them very quickly redact and declassify documents.

They ripped through 240,000 MLK documents, redacted, declassified and released.

There is absolutely no reason why they can't do the same with the Epstein files. They are covering up. They need to release what they have. The AI can be used to redact information about the victims, but they absolutely need to expose the criminals and we need them held accountable.

well they don't want them released.

also, if the files don't show that Bill Clinton and Barack Obama are the king pedos, any redactions whatsoever, no matter how appropriate, are going to be taken as more conspiracy by the MAGA faithful.

Trump set himself up with a battle he cannot win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Haven’t been home to watch the new yet but do they even care about the whole Obama Russia Interference thing? It seems like none of the distractions are sticking.

[Anonymous]

I wonder how long the WSJ has been sitting on this information. I find it interesting that Vance is hiding out in Nantucket nowhere to be found while this is going on.

[Anonymous]

Trump has to be stripped of his citizenship and deported!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BREAKING WSJ:

The Department of Justice told Trump in May that his name is IN the Epstein Files.

When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a “truckload” of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump’s name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

Link: https://www.wsj.com/politics/justice-department-told-trump-name-in-epstein-files-727a8038?mod=hp_lead_pos1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BREAKING WSJ:

The Department of Justice told Trump in May that his name is IN the Epstein Files.

When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a “truckload” of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump’s name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

Link: https://www.wsj.com/politics/justice-department-told-trump-name-in-epstein-files-727a8038?mod=hp_lead_pos1

Good thing I have no idea who that is!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Trump admin is being attacked from the inside and they don’t know what to do. If Murdoch turns off the MAGA fox propaganda hose it’s going to be a problem for the admin.

I love this for them. Thanks for Murdoch for his attention to this matter. Though, I’m sure it will just result in him blackmailing Trump.