Hey PP. Seven of my family members have had the virus. One is dead. Three family members are working as nurses or ER docs and have been treating Covid patients in Virginia and NY for months. Also, numerous friends, one of whose FIL died. Do I qualify? |
I was a gifted kid and concur with this. I was also a teacher for a decade, and i have NEVER heard anyone say that larger classes have advantages. The smaller the class, the more individual attention you can give to each student, so that EACH student can thrive. Maybe this poster is only focused on their child's experience, and maybe they have the kind of kid who would thrive anywhere. but smaller classes are better for ALL the kids. In larger classroom, I guarantee that kids will be left behind/ignored. |
I don’t think anything in your original post would clearly show you have experience in schools. That being said you clearly have disdain for the regular Ed teachers you work with since your original assumption was that a teacher is lazy and ignores students with disabilities. I’m sure your colleagues love working with you. |
| This teacher has been nothing but a troll since the shut down occurred. They just want to rile parents up. |
Qualify for what? You qualify for our sympathy. That is a lot of loss. Do you qualify for a school model that will lead to more deaths? No. |
NP. Do you have evidence that opening schools will lead to more deaths? No, because it doesn't exist. |
I am not hiring someone to babysit my tween daughter. |
I think the onus is on you. In the midst of a highly infectious disease, it seems that closing as much as possible is good. It might turn out that closing schools isn't as important (I know that idea is out there and worth exploring), but the burden of proof falls on those asserting they should be open. The logic behind closing them is plain and sufficient. |
Yours is the position of someone who doesn't think kids and school are important enough to take a certain amount of risk. If you consider school essential for kids' well-being and future, the calculus changes. It is all about priorities and trade-offs. |
NP here - also, the "it's safer to close the schools" reasoning relies on the faulty assumption that kids will stay home with their families if schools are not open. This is likely not going to be the case - working parents will need to work, and will utilize daycare/group nanny situations. Or even worse, kids will be left unsupervised at home, and injuries/accidents will go up. So it's just re-shifting the legal risk from schools to elsewhere. |
PP you are responding to here and I agree. None of this is about protecting the kids (who are at lower risk from Covid than from the flu), or even truly about limiting the virus' spread through society. It is ALL about protecting the at-risk staff, and the administrators from liability. Kids come last in this calculation. |
? When have we ever put kids first? If we did there would be more money allocated to public education in general. I'm not sure what you think a poorly funded school system is to do? Lose teachers and then have even less?? DC already has a sub shortage so that's not a solution. If given the option there will be plenty of teachers and likely families opting to only do DL if given the choice. What then? There's many unanswered questions and honestly not only the students are a factor, they never have been. They are looking at the whole picture and I don't think that's wrong. The school system is not meant to solve poverty, homelessness, abuse, childcare, psychological issues, hunger, etc. (Yet they try really hard to because it's expected) It's really odd that we think it should, if that's really the case shouldn't we actually be investing more into schools? |
What an odd response. Of course we should be investing more in public education. But kids' best interests, with regard to their education, should absolutely come first when decisions about public education policies are made. That doesn't mean schools should solve all of society's child-related problems, but education should be the top priority. I don't know, maybe I don't fully understand your rant because I did not grow up in this country. |
Of course opening schools will lead to more deaths during a global pandemic before a vaccine is available. The question isn't will more deaths occur, it's how many more should we tolerate as a society? It's a very tough call for politicians. |
Agreed, that is the question, and it is not a scientific one. I don't really see us having that discussion though. It seems that the approach is that anything that *might* lead to more deaths is to be avoided, no matter the other costs. Because when it comes to schools, for all we know now, the impact is likely going to be minimal. That's what the study published this week in Nature also concludes, stating that there is no strong evidence that closing schools had an effect on the prevention of infections in any country. See this article, study linked within: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-08/lockdowns-may-have-helped-prevent-half-a-billion-covid-cases?sref=Of7mcH17 And this is a study that was based on the IC model, which is otherwise highly in favor of lockdowns. |