Guiliani, Trump, and Ukraine

Anonymous
"This is what happens when you become visible . . . the buzzards descend," to which Parnas responded, "[t]hat's why we need to stay under the radar . . . . " (at this point referring to creditors who when media reports began to surface about the contributions wanted money)

Page 7

This is what Citizens United has wrought?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Marcy Wheeler:

If you put Parnas/Fruman indictment, Dowd letter affirming Rudy and Parnas were working for Trump, and the Trump-Zelenskyy "transcript" together, it's hard to see how Trump's comments about Yovanovitch aren't part of conspiracy charged in the indictment.


You'll have to break it down for me. Why was she in the way?


She is not corrupt and they all are.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:A) Former Trump lawyer John Dowd is representing these frauds
B) He communicates in comic sans



What kind of lawyer uses comic sans? Layer here. I know it’s a small thing. But come on. Times New Roman. Maybe Courier. You aren’t a middle school girl (says a woman who has one who thinks this don’t is cute). Just do it.
Anonymous
"in fact, GEP had no existing business, was not funded with bona fide capital investment, and was not engaged in energy trading" -- page 10

so much for Trump's claim about Rick Perry and LNG
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wall Street Journal scoop: Career budget staffers at OMB questioned the legality of delaying aid to Ukraine.

So the White House authorized an appointee to make the move.

These career staffers need to be deposed.


And given a medal. I sat besides an OMB Lawyer (civil service) at a kids event and chatted. Without violating any ethics laws, her message was : bloodbath there.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The plot thickens. It's an SDNY case - the same SDNY that argued last week that POTUS can't be prosecuted for ANY crimes.

And Parnas (maybe Fruman too?) was supposed to be deposed by the House Intelligence Comm today for the impeachment inquiry.

https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/20190930%20-%20Parnas%20Letter%20and%20Doc%20Request%20Schedule.pdf

So maybe SDNY is doing someone a favor?


But it isn't a constitutional crisis, right? Just business as usual?

I'm ready for barr to be disbarred and go to prison.


I posted this last comment, but now I am reading that their lawyer said they weren't planning to testify, and that they were about to get on a flight out of the US. So IDK what is going on. It is good they were arrested but I think they need to testify before congress. If they are in federal custody, can congress compel them to testify?


Sure. If they are in jail, the marshalls can deliver them to Congress. But DOJ can block the move.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A) Former Trump lawyer John Dowd is representing these frauds
B) He communicates in comic sans



What kind of lawyer uses comic sans? Layer here. I know it’s a small thing. But come on. Times New Roman. Maybe Courier. You aren’t a middle school girl (says a woman who has one who thinks this don’t is cute). Just do it.


Perhaps to appear deceptively naive? No idea.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:A) Former Trump lawyer John Dowd is representing these frauds
B) He communicates in comic sans




LMFAO
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Barr et al are trying to pin everything on Rudy. Argument will be, poor President Trump was taken in by that wily Rudy.


Trump who listens to no one and goes with his gut? Tru p is never going to let the “my lawyer manipulated me” argument. He’s a narcissist.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Marcy Wheeler:

If you put Parnas/Fruman indictment, Dowd letter affirming Rudy and Parnas were working for Trump, and the Trump-Zelenskyy "transcript" together, it's hard to see how Trump's comments about Yovanovitch aren't part of conspiracy charged in the indictment.


You'll have to break it down for me. Why was she in the way?


Because she was an actual, real diplomat, not a Trump/Russia stooge.
Anonymous
From the Indictment:

"Parnas and Fruman, who had no significant prior history of political donations, sought to advance their personal financial interests and the political interests of at least one Ukrainian government official with whom they were working."

"... At and around the same time Parnas and Fruman committed to raising those funds for Congressman-1, Parnas met with Congressman-1 and sought Congressman-1's assistance in causing the U.S. Government to remove or recall the then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine. Parnas's efforts to remove the Ambassador were conducted, at least in part, at the request of one or more Ukrainian government officials."

Is the Ukrainian official Rudy's guy Lutsenko?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Marcy Wheeler:

If you put Parnas/Fruman indictment, Dowd letter affirming Rudy and Parnas were working for Trump, and the Trump-Zelenskyy "transcript" together, it's hard to see how Trump's comments about Yovanovitch aren't part of conspiracy charged in the indictment.


You'll have to break it down for me. Why was she in the way?


Because she wouldn't facilitate Rudy's "work" when he would come to the Ukraine to dig up dirt on the Bidens. She wasn't playing ball.


OK. I'm just surprised they would go to those lengths just for leverage on a political rival. Is there something else Trump/Rudy are hiding? Profiteering/money laundering or something?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Marcy Wheeler:

If you put Parnas/Fruman indictment, Dowd letter affirming Rudy and Parnas were working for Trump, and the Trump-Zelenskyy "transcript" together, it's hard to see how Trump's comments about Yovanovitch aren't part of conspiracy charged in the indictment.


You'll have to break it down for me. Why was she in the way?


Because she wouldn't facilitate Rudy's "work" when he would come to the Ukraine to dig up dirt on the Bidens. She wasn't playing ball.


OK. I'm just surprised they would go to those lengths just for leverage on a political rival. Is there something else Trump/Rudy are hiding? Profiteering/money laundering or something?


Well, they also wanted retail marijuana licenses in multiple states (page 12)

I am confused, Lev Parnas had or has a company called FraudGuarantee claiming a $600M cap selling fraud insurance, but dodging creditors and trying to get into the retail pot business?

I know, anyone can make a website. . .
Anonymous
There are so many moving parts I am getting a little lost.

Has anyone seen a good explainer for ALL THIS?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: