Mueller Report is being delivered to Barr today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ben wittes preliminary thoughts
https://www.lawfareblog.com/very-quick-thoughts-end-mueller-investigation

This dude is as reliable as a paper straw in a Big Gulp.

DP. I assume you didn’t actually read what he wrote, because your comment is nonsensical in the context.

You mean as nonsensical as this witch hunt? You got me. Once a source is burned, I don't wait to see if it will resurrect itself with better judgement.

LOL. And yet here you are, supporting Trump.

Thinking the clowns that pushed (and often profited) this 'Russian collusion' narrative are frauds isn't automatically indicative of 'supporting Trump'. Imagine if all that energy in expecting to find something involving Russia was used to re-imagine the Democratic Party, they'd have a massively better chance of beating him in 2020.

I'm wondering what a re-imagined democrat party looks like, given their agenda today. What would it look like and what would their issues and agenda look like? Not platitudes like "equality for all", but real agenda items.

Way better than the GOP, given their agenda is election fraud and holding on to power at all costs. And it's the Democratic party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trumps silence on the whole thing is the most intriguing to me. He hasn’t tweeted in about 19 hours, hasn’t made a peep about the report. You’d think he’d be all over the “no more indictments” reports, crowing about how he’s been vindicated, yet he’s not.

Either he doesn't know or it's bad for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trumps silence on the whole thing is the most intriguing to me. He hasn’t tweeted in about 19 hours, hasn’t made a peep about the report. You’d think he’d be all over the “no more indictments” reports, crowing about how he’s been vindicated, yet he’s not.

Lot's of media figures who hyped the story are similarly silent. I'm not sure there's much to make this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trumps silence on the whole thing is the most intriguing to me. He hasn’t tweeted in about 19 hours, hasn’t made a peep about the report. You’d think he’d be all over the “no more indictments” reports, crowing about how he’s been vindicated, yet he’s not.

Lot's of media figures who hyped the story are similarly silent. I'm not sure there's much to make this.

I think anyone who's worth listening to is waiting to see what the report actually says.

Unlike the clowns on both sides who are talking BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trumps silence on the whole thing is the most intriguing to me. He hasn’t tweeted in about 19 hours, hasn’t made a peep about the report. You’d think he’d be all over the “no more indictments” reports, crowing about how he’s been vindicated, yet he’s not.

Either he doesn't know or it's bad for him.

Damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t. What difference doesn’t make? You would create a story no matter his reaction. This whole fiasco is truly sad for our country, and I’m not talking about trumps presidency. The fbi has shown it’s corruption. And destroyed people’s lives and reputations. This should sadden any decent American.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trumps silence on the whole thing is the most intriguing to me. He hasn’t tweeted in about 19 hours, hasn’t made a peep about the report. You’d think he’d be all over the “no more indictments” reports, crowing about how he’s been vindicated, yet he’s not.

Either he doesn't know or it's bad for him.

When has Trump,ever waited to be fully informed on something before bragging about it? You know he’d be all over the no more indictments reports unless he already knows that’s not quite what it seems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trumps silence on the whole thing is the most intriguing to me. He hasn’t tweeted in about 19 hours, hasn’t made a peep about the report. You’d think he’d be all over the “no more indictments” reports, crowing about how he’s been vindicated, yet he’s not.

For the past week, did he act like someone who thinks the report is vindication?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trumps silence on the whole thing is the most intriguing to me. He hasn’t tweeted in about 19 hours, hasn’t made a peep about the report. You’d think he’d be all over the “no more indictments” reports, crowing about how he’s been vindicated, yet he’s not.

Either he doesn't know or it's bad for him.

Damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t. What difference doesn’t make? You would create a story no matter his reaction. This whole fiasco is truly sad for our country, and I’m not talking about trumps presidency. The fbi has shown it’s corruption. And destroyed people’s lives and reputations. This should sadden any decent American.

Whose lives and reputations have been damaged?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trumps silence on the whole thing is the most intriguing to me. He hasn’t tweeted in about 19 hours, hasn’t made a peep about the report. You’d think he’d be all over the “no more indictments” reports, crowing about how he’s been vindicated, yet he’s not.

Either he doesn't know or it's bad for him.

Damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t. What difference doesn’t make? You would create a story no matter his reaction. This whole fiasco is truly sad for our country, and I’m not talking about trumps presidency. The fbi has shown it’s corruption. And destroyed people’s lives and reputations. This should sadden any decent American.

What corruption?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ben wittes preliminary thoughts
https://www.lawfareblog.com/very-quick-thoughts-end-mueller-investigation

This dude is as reliable as a paper straw in a Big Gulp.

DP. I assume you didn’t actually read what he wrote, because your comment is nonsensical in the context.

You mean as nonsensical as this witch hunt? You got me. Once a source is burned, I don't wait to see if it will resurrect itself with better judgement.

LOL. And yet here you are, supporting Trump.

Thinking the clowns that pushed (and often profited) this 'Russian collusion' narrative are frauds isn't automatically indicative of 'supporting Trump'. Imagine if all that energy in expecting to find something involving Russia was used to re-imagine the Democratic Party, they'd have a massively better chance of beating him in 2020.

I'm wondering what a re-imagined democrat party looks like, given their agenda today. What would it look like and what would their issues and agenda look like? Not platitudes like "equality for all", but real agenda items.

Way better than the GOP, given their agenda is election fraud and holding on to power at all costs. And it's the Democratic party.

PP, if the GOP is so bad, why does the Democratic Party of recent decades keep losing to them? That group of clowns (i.e. The Democrats) 'we're less bad' routine needs to be seen for the cynical ploy it is. We need something massively better to deal with our problems and the recent Democrats need to be seen, like the recent GOP, as authors of those problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trumps silence on the whole thing is the most intriguing to me. He hasn’t tweeted in about 19 hours, hasn’t made a peep about the report. You’d think he’d be all over the “no more indictments” reports, crowing about how he’s been vindicated, yet he’s not.

Same!

I think he is nervous AF. What other reason could there be? Intriguing, indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trumps silence on the whole thing is the most intriguing to me. He hasn’t tweeted in about 19 hours, hasn’t made a peep about the report. You’d think he’d be all over the “no more indictments” reports, crowing about how he’s been vindicated, yet he’s not.

Either he doesn't know or it's bad for him.

Damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t. What difference doesn’t make? You would create a story no matter his reaction. This whole fiasco is truly sad for our country, and I’m not talking about trumps presidency. The fbi has shown it’s corruption. And destroyed people’s lives and reputations. This should sadden any decent American.

What corruption?

That stories can be invented to pursue political opponents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trumps silence on the whole thing is the most intriguing to me. He hasn’t tweeted in about 19 hours, hasn’t made a peep about the report. You’d think he’d be all over the “no more indictments” reports, crowing about how he’s been vindicated, yet he’s not.

Lot's of media figures who hyped the story are similarly silent. I'm not sure there's much to make this.

I think anyone who's worth listening to is waiting to see what the report actually says.

Unlike the clowns on both sides who are talking BS.

What report?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trumps silence on the whole thing is the most intriguing to me. He hasn’t tweeted in about 19 hours, hasn’t made a peep about the report. You’d think he’d be all over the “no more indictments” reports, crowing about how he’s been vindicated, yet he’s not.

Lot's of media figures who hyped the story are similarly silent. I'm not sure there's much to make this.

They all died.

[Anonymous]

Democrats = Dory

What report are you talking about? I don't know about any Mueller guy? Who dat?