| BIG props to 14:26. |
So Buddhism is just as valid as Christianity? Is that right? What about the Aztec religion? What about the kiddy-slaughter? Was that OK? If not, how do you determine which religions are OK and which ones are not? |
|
Golden Rule.
Karma. Don't need any religious doctrine, organized or otherwise, to understand that... |
|
22:22 here ... religion IS the opiate of the masses...
strip away that b.s. and you have the essential truths about treating yourself and others right, and there's no need to attach that to theism, religion, God, a higher power, or any of that b.s. -=-- all of which is fine for you if you think you need that, but don't impose it on me or anyone else. |
|
I've had dreams like this. The human brain is a wondrous thing. |
Amen! |
Thanks. I wasted about 15 minutes reading the links, so I figured another 15 pointing out the more obvious logical fallacies was the least I could do. |
| The Shadow. The Shadow knows. |
| I had a NDE. My faith started deteriorating at the same time. |
I'm not the PP, but I think morality evolves with society. The Aztecs thought they were doing something that benefitted everyone. I'm sure someone will look back at our time in history and be horrified, just as I do when I read the OT. |
|
The great Rabbi Hillel, who lived a short time before Jesus, was challenged to teach the Torah standing on one foot. He could have said Hear, oh Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is One. Many would consider that the essence of monotheistic Judaism. But instead, he chose the Golden Rule, in the slightly less onerous form of not doing to others what you would not want done to you.
You could say that he emphasized not God, but the Word of God. Perhaps, as has been said by some here, God gives even us atheists His Word despite the fact that we don't believe in Him. Maybe we atheists are really believers in John's opening line "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." The Word is the Golden Rule, and if you accept that you have all the God you need -- the Word IS God. So let's stop fighting. All who live by the Rule are believers. Some need to personalize God, and some just accept Good. By our deeds you should know us. |
| You don't have to believe in God to have a conscience. |
|
Earlier in the thread, there were multiple posts regarding the need for a god (A) to create morals/good and evil/right and wrong (B) and that people who thought morals were inherent and socially driven were just trying to skip over A. One thing that always struck me with this argument is the believe that everything must have been created by a creator to exist, but no thought on how that creator came to be.
If god created everything, where did god come from? And if an all powerful god could pop out of nowhere, why would we need him/her for the spontaneous creation of life? Looping back to the original question - I was raised Catholic but found that my morals didn't always align with the bible (stoning my sister, gays are immoral, etc.) and that people used this book to create a moral highground and hate others. Strip that all away and I am left with an innate feeling of right and wrong. Some rules are likely society driven, some from my parents and some feel right. Give your seat on the metro to someone who needs it more, help out others, do not harm others, etc. At one point I thought that I needed a "rule" or system. The categorical imperative, the golden rule, etc. I find that following my heart to do what is right usually provides the best result. |
| We are born with sense of right and wrong. |