Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bondi also said there were hundreds of Epstein videos in the DoJ’s possession. Did those also now suddenly go poof? And we know she is lying about there being no list because redacted scans of his very extensive black book were already made public ears ago. Epstein kept records and organized details.

I think they’re leaning on semantics. Like maybe there isn’t a “list” but instead it’s a file or a booklet or something to that effect. But there was quite obviously something

There was definitely something. A LOT of something. And now the Trump administration is trying to disappear it, memory hole it, cover it up and wants us to forget about it and move on. That is incredibly damning.

The right's preoccupation with pedophilia and pedophiles is insincere. They're once again exploiting serious issues to energize a base of ignorant supporters. The idea that Epstein had some list of influential people (possibly including former and current presidents) with whom he helped have sex with minors is so stupid that it doesn't deserve serious consideration. But it receives serious consideration because the right loves to exploit serious issues and stupid people for its benefit. Their supporters are so stupid that even now they believe that (1) there's a list and (2) that the MFs who exploited the issue are now the ones covering up wrongdoing that they committed to exposing, and thus can't be trusted.

I listened to a podcast years ago that explained the history of the religious right using "protecting the children" as way to advance their agenda. I wish I could remember the name of it because it was fascinating. It talked about the witch trials, satanic panic, all the way up through pizzagate and the current nonsense. They latch onto to this because if you disagree with them, they'll accuse you of supporting pedophiles and what normal person would support that. It's all a ploy. The ignorant ones may think it's about saving the children, but that's not what this is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bondi also said there were hundreds of Epstein videos in the DoJ’s possession. Did those also now suddenly go poof? And we know she is lying about there being no list because redacted scans of his very extensive black book were already made public ears ago. Epstein kept records and organized details.

I think they’re leaning on semantics. Like maybe there isn’t a “list” but instead it’s a file or a booklet or something to that effect. But there was quite obviously something

There was definitely something. A LOT of something. And now the Trump administration is trying to disappear it, memory hole it, cover it up and wants us to forget about it and move on. That is incredibly damning.

The right's preoccupation with pedophilia and pedophiles is insincere. They're once again exploiting serious issues to energize a base of ignorant supporters. The idea that Epstein had some list of influential people (possibly including former and current presidents) with whom he helped have sex with minors is so stupid that it doesn't deserve serious consideration. But it receives serious consideration because the right loves to exploit serious issues and stupid people for its benefit. Their supporters are so stupid that even now they believe that (1) there's a list and (2) that the MFs who exploited the issue are now the ones covering up wrongdoing that they committed to exposing, and thus can't be trusted.

I listened to a podcast years ago that explained the history of the religious right using "protecting the children" as way to advance their agenda. I wish I could remember the name of it because it was fascinating. It talked about the witch trials, satanic panic, all the way up through pizzagate and the current nonsense. They latch onto to this because if you disagree with them, they'll accuse you of supporting pedophiles and what normal person would support that. It's all a ploy. The ignorant ones may think it's about saving the children, but that's not what this is.

Now explain how they reconcile that with supporting a guy who is a proud sexual predator...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bondi also said there were hundreds of Epstein videos in the DoJ’s possession. Did those also now suddenly go poof? And we know she is lying about there being no list because redacted scans of his very extensive black book were already made public ears ago. Epstein kept records and organized details.

I think they’re leaning on semantics. Like maybe there isn’t a “list” but instead it’s a file or a booklet or something to that effect. But there was quite obviously something

There was definitely something. A LOT of something. And now the Trump administration is trying to disappear it, memory hole it, cover it up and wants us to forget about it and move on. That is incredibly damning.

The right's preoccupation with pedophilia and pedophiles is insincere. They're once again exploiting serious issues to energize a base of ignorant supporters. The idea that Epstein had some list of influential people (possibly including former and current presidents) with whom he helped have sex with minors is so stupid that it doesn't deserve serious consideration. But it receives serious consideration because the right loves to exploit serious issues and stupid people for its benefit. Their supporters are so stupid that even now they believe that (1) there's a list and (2) that the MFs who exploited the issue are now the ones covering up wrongdoing that they committed to exposing, and thus can't be trusted.

I listened to a podcast years ago that explained the history of the religious right using "protecting the children" as way to advance their agenda. I wish I could remember the name of it because it was fascinating. It talked about the witch trials, satanic panic, all the way up through pizzagate and the current nonsense. They latch onto to this because if you disagree with them, they'll accuse you of supporting pedophiles and what normal person would support that. It's all a ploy. The ignorant ones may think it's about saving the children, but that's not what this is.

Now explain how they reconcile that with supporting a guy who is a proud sexual predator...

Apparently they (some of them) have finally run into difficulty with that. Better late than never.

[Anonymous]

I think Pam Bondi might actually get fired over this one. They need a scapegoat and this looks really bad for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bondi also said there were hundreds of Epstein videos in the DoJ’s possession. Did those also now suddenly go poof? And we know she is lying about there being no list because redacted scans of his very extensive black book were already made public ears ago. Epstein kept records and organized details.

I think they’re leaning on semantics. Like maybe there isn’t a “list” but instead it’s a file or a booklet or something to that effect. But there was quite obviously something

There was definitely something. A LOT of something. And now the Trump administration is trying to disappear it, memory hole it, cover it up and wants us to forget about it and move on. That is incredibly damning.

The right's preoccupation with pedophilia and pedophiles is insincere. They're once again exploiting serious issues to energize a base of ignorant supporters. The idea that Epstein had some list of influential people (possibly including former and current presidents) with whom he helped have sex with minors is so stupid that it doesn't deserve serious consideration. But it receives serious consideration because the right loves to exploit serious issues and stupid people for its benefit. Their supporters are so stupid that even now they believe that (1) there's a list and (2) that the MFs who exploited the issue are now the ones covering up wrongdoing that they committed to exposing, and thus can't be trusted.

I listened to a podcast years ago that explained the history of the religious right using "protecting the children" as way to advance their agenda. I wish I could remember the name of it because it was fascinating. It talked about the witch trials, satanic panic, all the way up through pizzagate and the current nonsense. They latch onto to this because if you disagree with them, they'll accuse you of supporting pedophiles and what normal person would support that. It's all a ploy. The ignorant ones may think it's about saving the children, but that's not what this is.

Now explain how they reconcile that with supporting a guy who is a proud sexual predator...

DP. They’ve been in denial, now that they have to reconcile things like that amidst his actions, it is leaving them with feelings of disappointment, betrayal, and anger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't need Boni or anyone else to confirm Trump was an Epstein client. I saw them together MANY times, laughing/hugging/partying. I saw trump say he was a good guy. We know women (plural) testified to being introduced to him. We KNOW G. Maxwell - Epstein's close associate- is rotting in prison for trafficking young women for Epstein.

If it walks like a duck, sounds like a duck . . . .

All the years of gotcha lawsuits against him. The surface area of those people with access to case files and yet never leaked any detail you mention. Don't you find it strange with all the people who hate him, that evidence has not come out? There are leakers everywhere, but we should just believe his name as a client is really there because of.... a duck?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't need Boni or anyone else to confirm Trump was an Epstein client. I saw them together MANY times, laughing/hugging/partying. I saw trump say he was a good guy. We know women (plural) testified to being introduced to him. We KNOW G. Maxwell - Epstein's close associate- is rotting in prison for trafficking young women for Epstein.

If it walks like a duck, sounds like a duck . . . .

All the years of gotcha lawsuits against him. The surface area of those people with access to case files and yet never leaked any detail you mention. Don't you find it strange with all the people who hate him, that evidence has not come out? There are leakers everywhere, but we should just believe his name as a client is really there because of.... a duck?

Yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love how Trump said “why are we still talking about Epstein, let’s move on.” How rich, coming from the guy who can’t let go of the 2020 election or Biden.

Nothing to see here, folks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't need Boni or anyone else to confirm Trump was an Epstein client. I saw them together MANY times, laughing/hugging/partying. I saw trump say he was a good guy. We know women (plural) testified to being introduced to him. We KNOW G. Maxwell - Epstein's close associate- is rotting in prison for trafficking young women for Epstein.

If it walks like a duck, sounds like a duck . . . .

All the years of gotcha lawsuits against him. The surface area of those people with access to case files and yet never leaked any detail you mention. Don't you find it strange with all the people who hate him, that evidence has not come out? There are leakers everywhere, but we should just believe his name as a client is really there because of.... a duck?

Which gotcha lawsuits?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bondi also said there were hundreds of Epstein videos in the DoJ’s possession. Did those also now suddenly go poof? And we know she is lying about there being no list because redacted scans of his very extensive black book were already made public ears ago. Epstein kept records and organized details.

I think they’re leaning on semantics. Like maybe there isn’t a “list” but instead it’s a file or a booklet or something to that effect. But there was quite obviously something

There was definitely something. A LOT of something. And now the Trump administration is trying to disappear it, memory hole it, cover it up and wants us to forget about it and move on. That is incredibly damning.

The right's preoccupation with pedophilia and pedophiles is insincere. They're once again exploiting serious issues to energize a base of ignorant supporters. The idea that Epstein had some list of influential people (possibly including former and current presidents) with whom he helped have sex with minors is so stupid that it doesn't deserve serious consideration. But it receives serious consideration because the right loves to exploit serious issues and stupid people for its benefit. Their supporters are so stupid that even now they believe that (1) there's a list and (2) that the MFs who exploited the issue are now the ones covering up wrongdoing that they committed to exposing, and thus can't be trusted.

I listened to a podcast years ago that explained the history of the religious right using "protecting the children" as way to advance their agenda. I wish I could remember the name of it because it was fascinating. It talked about the witch trials, satanic panic, all the way up through pizzagate and the current nonsense. They latch onto to this because if you disagree with them, they'll accuse you of supporting pedophiles and what normal person would support that. It's all a ploy. The ignorant ones may think it's about saving the children, but that's not what this is.

Now explain how they reconcile that with supporting a guy who is a proud sexual predator...

They “forgive” him. Note, Trump has not asked for forgiveness because that would be admitting to wrong doing, but they “forgive” him anyhow. Apparently that is the “Christian” thing to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bondi also said there were hundreds of Epstein videos in the DoJ’s possession. Did those also now suddenly go poof? And we know she is lying about there being no list because redacted scans of his very extensive black book were already made public ears ago. Epstein kept records and organized details.

I think they’re leaning on semantics. Like maybe there isn’t a “list” but instead it’s a file or a booklet or something to that effect. But there was quite obviously something

There was definitely something. A LOT of something. And now the Trump administration is trying to disappear it, memory hole it, cover it up and wants us to forget about it and move on. That is incredibly damning.

The right's preoccupation with pedophilia and pedophiles is insincere. They're once again exploiting serious issues to energize a base of ignorant supporters. The idea that Epstein had some list of influential people (possibly including former and current presidents) with whom he helped have sex with minors is so stupid that it doesn't deserve serious consideration. But it receives serious consideration because the right loves to exploit serious issues and stupid people for its benefit. Their supporters are so stupid that even now they believe that (1) there's a list and (2) that the MFs who exploited the issue are now the ones covering up wrongdoing that they committed to exposing, and thus can't be trusted.

I listened to a podcast years ago that explained the history of the religious right using "protecting the children" as way to advance their agenda. I wish I could remember the name of it because it was fascinating. It talked about the witch trials, satanic panic, all the way up through pizzagate and the current nonsense. They latch onto to this because if you disagree with them, they'll accuse you of supporting pedophiles and what normal person would support that. It's all a ploy. The ignorant ones may think it's about saving the children, but that's not what this is.

The aim of the religious right is to take away all rights from women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bondi also said there were hundreds of Epstein videos in the DoJ’s possession. Did those also now suddenly go poof? And we know she is lying about there being no list because redacted scans of his very extensive black book were already made public ears ago. Epstein kept records and organized details.

I think they’re leaning on semantics. Like maybe there isn’t a “list” but instead it’s a file or a booklet or something to that effect. But there was quite obviously something

There was definitely something. A LOT of something. And now the Trump administration is trying to disappear it, memory hole it, cover it up and wants us to forget about it and move on. That is incredibly damning.

The right's preoccupation with pedophilia and pedophiles is insincere. They're once again exploiting serious issues to energize a base of ignorant supporters. The idea that Epstein had some list of influential people (possibly including former and current presidents) with whom he helped have sex with minors is so stupid that it doesn't deserve serious consideration. But it receives serious consideration because the right loves to exploit serious issues and stupid people for its benefit. Their supporters are so stupid that even now they believe that (1) there's a list and (2) that the MFs who exploited the issue are now the ones covering up wrongdoing that they committed to exposing, and thus can't be trusted.

I listened to a podcast years ago that explained the history of the religious right using "protecting the children" as way to advance their agenda. I wish I could remember the name of it because it was fascinating. It talked about the witch trials, satanic panic, all the way up through pizzagate and the current nonsense. They latch onto to this because if you disagree with them, they'll accuse you of supporting pedophiles and what normal person would support that. It's all a ploy. The ignorant ones may think it's about saving the children, but that's not what this is.

Now explain how they reconcile that with supporting a guy who is a proud sexual predator...

"He denied this" was the comment I received wh n I asked A MAGA how he could support a man who was an ajudicated rapist and had sex with a porn star weeks after his wife had given birth.

[Anonymous]

Noticed all the arrests the FBI is doing?

Lying about the Epstein List while they use it as a source?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't need Boni or anyone else to confirm Trump was an Epstein client. I saw them together MANY times, laughing/hugging/partying. I saw trump say he was a good guy. We know women (plural) testified to being introduced to him. We KNOW G. Maxwell - Epstein's close associate- is rotting in prison for trafficking young women for Epstein.

If it walks like a duck, sounds like a duck . . . .

All the years of gotcha lawsuits against him. The surface area of those people with access to case files and yet never leaked any detail you mention. Don't you find it strange with all the people who hate him, that evidence has not come out? There are leakers everywhere, but we should just believe his name as a client is really there because of.... a duck?

Trump has been a continual, serial bad actor which has been the cause of many of the suits against him. But of all of the suits, only one, "Jane Doe" was about Trump relating to Epstein, but I believe there were no files produced by Trump in discovery because the case was withdrawn, allegedly because of threats made against the plaintiff. So nobody who could have leaked anything had any opportunity to do so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Noticed all the arrests the FBI is doing?

Lying about the Epstein List while they use it as a source?

What Epstein-related arrests have been made?