Trump in France w world leaders

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive and even Trump's presence there cannot ruin it. It was their way before Trump came along and it will be there way after he is long gone.

See? What did I just say? Always try to find something negative to say.

It's not negative. It's positive. This day is about Notre Dame and the restoration. This day is not about Trump. Pope Francis had it right. Let the cathedral be the center of attention.

So why say that his presence could not ruin the day and mention his mortality. That's pretty negative to me. You could have just stopped at "Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive"

I didn't start this thread about Trump at Notre Dame. Blame that on the op.

Why should I blame the OP? The thread is in the political forum so of course it's appropriate to discuss Trump at Notre-Dame ceremony. You were negative about Trump when you wrote that he couldn't ruin the day (why would you think he could ruin the day in the first place unless you have a pre-conceived negative opinion about him?). Then you proceeded to mention his mortality. Sure, everyone dies, but why mention it during a happy occasion? I'm sure you don't go around at a wedding and say the happy couple will outlive their parents, right? You do have more common sense than that, right?

You act like there was some secret message here. I don't think Trump's presence at this ceremony elevates him or this country or the cathedral. I think it's blatant pandering because that's how you get what you want from this guy. You think it's impressive in some way. We disagree and that's allowed. It's a forum.

You're allowed to say whatever you want but just don't deny that the original comment was negative. We see respect, you see pandering. That's fine. But that's negative.

And T is a fount of positivity? He's pledged retribution and dictatorship, and has indicated he won't hire anyone who won't pledge blind loyalty to him at the expense of our nation's constitution. How dare you chide us to be positive. Your leader and (sadly) our future President isn't. At all.

Why do you have to answer everything with what about Trump? We're talking about you people always trying to find something negative to say about Trump and then denying it. That was the point of that convo. I guess, deep down you want just to be like him since you keep on trying to be as "negative" as he is.

And, how dare you accuse me of pledging blind loyalty to Trump at the expense of our constitution? I have my reason to support him and you have your reasons to support someone else. That doesn't make me naive/stupid and you enlightened. Sick of hearing your holier than thou rhetoric that you hold the Universal truth while people who don't agree with you are stupid.

NP. If you support Trump, we know you have no intelligence and/or no integrity. He is an absolutely awful human being who is not remotely qualified to be POTUS. If you don't realize that, you are a fool. If you do, and you voted for him anyway for some batshit reason, then no one owes you or your opinions any respect. Period.

It's not holier than thou rhetoric. It's facts you don't want to face.

We all know that you think your sh*t don't stink, but it does like anyone else. You're the one missing a few nuts, dear. The simple fact that you thought just a few months ago that Biden was up to lead our country for another 4 years tells me everything I need to know about your intelligence. The fact is you're a stupid whiny loser who can't accept that people of United States have spoken. Insisting that you know better will not make it a fact.

Did you miss where is says "NP"? It says nothing in my post about Biden or anything else other than that Trump is not qualified (he's not) and that anyone who voted for him is a fool or batshit (also true). If you supported him, you don't get to cast aspersions about anyone's intelligence. Your post is a whole lot of typical MAGA-whiner projection. Every accusation is a confession. Reread your entire paragraph and apply to yourself, sweetheart.

Some of us are realists who can see that the country is going down the toilet, because too many people (like you, dear) were either hoodwinked by Trump or are just as much a POS as he is. We don't have to follow you down into the gutter.

Long time lurker on Politics which generally was a Liberal Democratic echo chamber. Since the election it is much more vibrant as Republicans are not hiding but responding to those who fancy themselves as the educated elites whose thinking is reasonable and kind. Their hubris is amusing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive and even Trump's presence there cannot ruin it. It was their way before Trump came along and it will be there way after he is long gone.

See? What did I just say? Always try to find something negative to say.

It's not negative. It's positive. This day is about Notre Dame and the restoration. This day is not about Trump. Pope Francis had it right. Let the cathedral be the center of attention.

So why say that his presence could not ruin the day and mention his mortality. That's pretty negative to me. You could have just stopped at "Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive"

I didn't start this thread about Trump at Notre Dame. Blame that on the op.

Why should I blame the OP? The thread is in the political forum so of course it's appropriate to discuss Trump at Notre-Dame ceremony. You were negative about Trump when you wrote that he couldn't ruin the day (why would you think he could ruin the day in the first place unless you have a pre-conceived negative opinion about him?). Then you proceeded to mention his mortality. Sure, everyone dies, but why mention it during a happy occasion? I'm sure you don't go around at a wedding and say the happy couple will outlive their parents, right? You do have more common sense than that, right?

You act like there was some secret message here. I don't think Trump's presence at this ceremony elevates him or this country or the cathedral. I think it's blatant pandering because that's how you get what you want from this guy. You think it's impressive in some way. We disagree and that's allowed. It's a forum.

You're allowed to say whatever you want but just don't deny that the original comment was negative. We see respect, you see pandering. That's fine. But that's negative.

And T is a fount of positivity? He's pledged retribution and dictatorship, and has indicated he won't hire anyone who won't pledge blind loyalty to him at the expense of our nation's constitution. How dare you chide us to be positive. Your leader and (sadly) our future President isn't. At all.

Why do you have to answer everything with what about Trump? We're talking about you people always trying to find something negative to say about Trump and then denying it. That was the point of that convo. I guess, deep down you want just to be like him since you keep on trying to be as "negative" as he is.

And, how dare you accuse me of pledging blind loyalty to Trump at the expense of our constitution? I have my reason to support him and you have your reasons to support someone else. That doesn't make me naive/stupid and you enlightened. Sick of hearing your holier than thou rhetoric that you hold the Universal truth while people who don't agree with you are stupid.

NP. If you support Trump, we know you have no intelligence and/or no integrity. He is an absolutely awful human being who is not remotely qualified to be POTUS. If you don't realize that, you are a fool. If you do, and you voted for him anyway for some batshit reason, then no one owes you or your opinions any respect. Period.

It's not holier than thou rhetoric. It's facts you don't want to face.

We all know that you think your sh*t don't stink, but it does like anyone else. You're the one missing a few nuts, dear. The simple fact that you thought just a few months ago that Biden was up to lead our country for another 4 years tells me everything I need to know about your intelligence. The fact is you're a stupid whiny loser who can't accept that people of United States have spoken. Insisting that you know better will not make it a fact.

Did you miss where is says "NP"? It says nothing in my post about Biden or anything else other than that Trump is not qualified (he's not) and that anyone who voted for him is a fool or batshit (also true). If you supported him, you don't get to cast aspersions about anyone's intelligence. Your post is a whole lot of typical MAGA-whiner projection. Every accusation is a confession. Reread your entire paragraph and apply to yourself, sweetheart.

Some of us are realists who can see that the country is going down the toilet, because too many people (like you, dear) were either hoodwinked by Trump or are just as much a POS as he is. We don't have to follow you down into the gutter.

Long time lurker on Politics which generally was a Liberal Democratic echo chamber. Since the election it is much more vibrant as Republicans are not hiding but responding to those who fancy themselves as the educated elites whose thinking is reasonable and kind. Their hubris is amusing.

Regardless of who is elite or not elite or who has hubris and who does not, macron and other world leaders flatter and stroke and kiss Trump's ass to try to get what they want. Trump is not that hard of a person to figure out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tbh I do wonder why Biden wasn’t there instead. He is the sitting US president. It seems like he should be there.

Foreign leaders criticized Trump. Now they’re courting him.

The president-elect is in Paris on Saturday not as a punchline but as a guest of honor for the reopening of Notre Dame, the world-famous cathedral whose guardians once seemed to mock him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/12/07/trump-notre-dame-france-macron/

Biden is out, Trump is in.

They all still (rightly) think Trump is a senile clown but are now in the unfortunate situation of needing his cooperation to keep the world from going sideways.

Same way the western world felt about the racist womanizer Franklin Roosevelt but that turned out okay.

Funny you have to go back until the 1940's! Yes, Trump would have fitted in very nicely!

Well, that was the last time European leaders were courting Roosevelt to save them from the Nazis

Trump would have told them 'America first!' I like German generals. Hitler was a brillant leader.

No that was old Joe Kennedy who was shouting “America First” in his brief tenure as Ambassador to the Court of St James. After he scooped up valuable the British liquor licenses to expand his prohibition booze business, Churchill insisted old Joe be recalled. Then the US got into the war.

Let's stick to the 21st century, shall we? I am not going to defend Joe Kennedy or any Kennedy men. Are you going to keep living in the past?

Are you saying we got in the war because of Joe Kennedy's booze business? Or the fact we were stopping Hitler?

We are talking about the 21st C when European leaders courted Trump as they last courted Roosevelt who was following an American First policy. Joe Kennedy was a leading proponent of America First but after Roosevelt made him the ambassador to Great Britain and he got the lucrative licenses, he stepped back from his stance and urged Roosevelt to do the same. At the risk of offending you with another 20th C figure, Churchill may have had something to do with the licenses and Kennedy putting aside America First

We were not keen to get into the war until Roosevelt dropped his America First stance. Probably more Churchill than Kennedy but both played a part.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive and even Trump's presence there cannot ruin it. It was their way before Trump came along and it will be there way after he is long gone.

See? What did I just say? Always try to find something negative to say.

It's not negative. It's positive. This day is about Notre Dame and the restoration. This day is not about Trump. Pope Francis had it right. Let the cathedral be the center of attention.

So why say that his presence could not ruin the day and mention his mortality. That's pretty negative to me. You could have just stopped at "Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive"

I didn't start this thread about Trump at Notre Dame. Blame that on the op.

Why should I blame the OP? The thread is in the political forum so of course it's appropriate to discuss Trump at Notre-Dame ceremony. You were negative about Trump when you wrote that he couldn't ruin the day (why would you think he could ruin the day in the first place unless you have a pre-conceived negative opinion about him?). Then you proceeded to mention his mortality. Sure, everyone dies, but why mention it during a happy occasion? I'm sure you don't go around at a wedding and say the happy couple will outlive their parents, right? You do have more common sense than that, right?

You act like there was some secret message here. I don't think Trump's presence at this ceremony elevates him or this country or the cathedral. I think it's blatant pandering because that's how you get what you want from this guy. You think it's impressive in some way. We disagree and that's allowed. It's a forum.

You're allowed to say whatever you want but just don't deny that the original comment was negative. We see respect, you see pandering. That's fine. But that's negative.

And T is a fount of positivity? He's pledged retribution and dictatorship, and has indicated he won't hire anyone who won't pledge blind loyalty to him at the expense of our nation's constitution. How dare you chide us to be positive. Your leader and (sadly) our future President isn't. At all.

Why do you have to answer everything with what about Trump? We're talking about you people always trying to find something negative to say about Trump and then denying it. That was the point of that convo. I guess, deep down you want just to be like him since you keep on trying to be as "negative" as he is.

And, how dare you accuse me of pledging blind loyalty to Trump at the expense of our constitution? I have my reason to support him and you have your reasons to support someone else. That doesn't make me naive/stupid and you enlightened. Sick of hearing your holier than thou rhetoric that you hold the Universal truth while people who don't agree with you are stupid.

NP. If you support Trump, we know you have no intelligence and/or no integrity. He is an absolutely awful human being who is not remotely qualified to be POTUS. If you don't realize that, you are a fool. If you do, and you voted for him anyway for some batshit reason, then no one owes you or your opinions any respect. Period.

It's not holier than thou rhetoric. It's facts you don't want to face.

We all know that you think your sh*t don't stink, but it does like anyone else. You're the one missing a few nuts, dear. The simple fact that you thought just a few months ago that Biden was up to lead our country for another 4 years tells me everything I need to know about your intelligence. The fact is you're a stupid whiny loser who can't accept that people of United States have spoken. Insisting that you know better will not make it a fact.

Did you miss where is says "NP"? It says nothing in my post about Biden or anything else other than that Trump is not qualified (he's not) and that anyone who voted for him is a fool or batshit (also true). If you supported him, you don't get to cast aspersions about anyone's intelligence. Your post is a whole lot of typical MAGA-whiner projection. Every accusation is a confession. Reread your entire paragraph and apply to yourself, sweetheart.

Some of us are realists who can see that the country is going down the toilet, because too many people (like you, dear) were either hoodwinked by Trump or are just as much a POS as he is. We don't have to follow you down into the gutter.

Long time lurker on Politics which generally was a Liberal Democratic echo chamber. Since the election it is much more vibrant as Republicans are not hiding but responding to those who fancy themselves as the educated elites whose thinking is reasonable and kind. Their hubris is amusing.

Regardless of who is elite or not elite or who has hubris and who does not, macron and other world leaders flatter and stroke and kiss Trump's ass to try to get what they want. Trump is not that hard of a person to figure out.

Duh!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive and even Trump's presence there cannot ruin it. It was their way before Trump came along and it will be there way after he is long gone.

See? What did I just say? Always try to find something negative to say.

It's not negative. It's positive. This day is about Notre Dame and the restoration. This day is not about Trump. Pope Francis had it right. Let the cathedral be the center of attention.

So why say that his presence could not ruin the day and mention his mortality. That's pretty negative to me. You could have just stopped at "Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive"

I didn't start this thread about Trump at Notre Dame. Blame that on the op.

Why should I blame the OP? The thread is in the political forum so of course it's appropriate to discuss Trump at Notre-Dame ceremony. You were negative about Trump when you wrote that he couldn't ruin the day (why would you think he could ruin the day in the first place unless you have a pre-conceived negative opinion about him?). Then you proceeded to mention his mortality. Sure, everyone dies, but why mention it during a happy occasion? I'm sure you don't go around at a wedding and say the happy couple will outlive their parents, right? You do have more common sense than that, right?

You act like there was some secret message here. I don't think Trump's presence at this ceremony elevates him or this country or the cathedral. I think it's blatant pandering because that's how you get what you want from this guy. You think it's impressive in some way. We disagree and that's allowed. It's a forum.

You're allowed to say whatever you want but just don't deny that the original comment was negative. We see respect, you see pandering. That's fine. But that's negative.

And T is a fount of positivity? He's pledged retribution and dictatorship, and has indicated he won't hire anyone who won't pledge blind loyalty to him at the expense of our nation's constitution. How dare you chide us to be positive. Your leader and (sadly) our future President isn't. At all.

Why do you have to answer everything with what about Trump? We're talking about you people always trying to find something negative to say about Trump and then denying it. That was the point of that convo. I guess, deep down you want just to be like him since you keep on trying to be as "negative" as he is.

And, how dare you accuse me of pledging blind loyalty to Trump at the expense of our constitution? I have my reason to support him and you have your reasons to support someone else. That doesn't make me naive/stupid and you enlightened. Sick of hearing your holier than thou rhetoric that you hold the Universal truth while people who don't agree with you are stupid.

NP. If you support Trump, we know you have no intelligence and/or no integrity. He is an absolutely awful human being who is not remotely qualified to be POTUS. If you don't realize that, you are a fool. If you do, and you voted for him anyway for some batshit reason, then no one owes you or your opinions any respect. Period.

It's not holier than thou rhetoric. It's facts you don't want to face.

We all know that you think your sh*t don't stink, but it does like anyone else. You're the one missing a few nuts, dear. The simple fact that you thought just a few months ago that Biden was up to lead our country for another 4 years tells me everything I need to know about your intelligence. The fact is you're a stupid whiny loser who can't accept that people of United States have spoken. Insisting that you know better will not make it a fact.

Did you miss where is says "NP"? It says nothing in my post about Biden or anything else other than that Trump is not qualified (he's not) and that anyone who voted for him is a fool or batshit (also true). If you supported him, you don't get to cast aspersions about anyone's intelligence. Your post is a whole lot of typical MAGA-whiner projection. Every accusation is a confession. Reread your entire paragraph and apply to yourself, sweetheart.

Some of us are realists who can see that the country is going down the toilet, because too many people (like you, dear) were either hoodwinked by Trump or are just as much a POS as he is. We don't have to follow you down into the gutter.

Long time lurker on Politics which generally was a Liberal Democratic echo chamber. Since the election it is much more vibrant as Republicans are not hiding but responding to those who fancy themselves as the educated elites whose thinking is reasonable and kind. Their hubris is amusing.

Regardless of who is elite or not elite or who has hubris and who does not, macron and other world leaders flatter and stroke and kiss Trump's ass to try to get what they want. Trump is not that hard of a person to figure out.

He really isn't. Which makes it amusing. Everyone is being so deferential to Trump - from Trudeau to Macron. I wonder if they hate themselves at the end of day.

For Zelensky, it's a life and death situation for his country. And he's an actor to begin with. I'm sure he's going full Shakespeare presently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Trump meets with William, Prince of Wales and future King of England.

That’s great. We already know Trump met Prince Andrew on the island.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive and even Trump's presence there cannot ruin it. It was their way before Trump came along and it will be there way after he is long gone.

See? What did I just say? Always try to find something negative to say.

It's not negative. It's positive. This day is about Notre Dame and the restoration. This day is not about Trump. Pope Francis had it right. Let the cathedral be the center of attention.

So why say that his presence could not ruin the day and mention his mortality. That's pretty negative to me. You could have just stopped at "Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive"

I didn't start this thread about Trump at Notre Dame. Blame that on the op.

Why should I blame the OP? The thread is in the political forum so of course it's appropriate to discuss Trump at Notre-Dame ceremony. You were negative about Trump when you wrote that he couldn't ruin the day (why would you think he could ruin the day in the first place unless you have a pre-conceived negative opinion about him?). Then you proceeded to mention his mortality. Sure, everyone dies, but why mention it during a happy occasion? I'm sure you don't go around at a wedding and say the happy couple will outlive their parents, right? You do have more common sense than that, right?

You act like there was some secret message here. I don't think Trump's presence at this ceremony elevates him or this country or the cathedral. I think it's blatant pandering because that's how you get what you want from this guy. You think it's impressive in some way. We disagree and that's allowed. It's a forum.

You're allowed to say whatever you want but just don't deny that the original comment was negative. We see respect, you see pandering. That's fine. But that's negative.

And T is a fount of positivity? He's pledged retribution and dictatorship, and has indicated he won't hire anyone who won't pledge blind loyalty to him at the expense of our nation's constitution. How dare you chide us to be positive. Your leader and (sadly) our future President isn't. At all.

Why do you have to answer everything with what about Trump? We're talking about you people always trying to find something negative to say about Trump and then denying it. That was the point of that convo. I guess, deep down you want just to be like him since you keep on trying to be as "negative" as he is.

And, how dare you accuse me of pledging blind loyalty to Trump at the expense of our constitution? I have my reason to support him and you have your reasons to support someone else. That doesn't make me naive/stupid and you enlightened. Sick of hearing your holier than thou rhetoric that you hold the Universal truth while people who don't agree with you are stupid.

NP. If you support Trump, we know you have no intelligence and/or no integrity. He is an absolutely awful human being who is not remotely qualified to be POTUS. If you don't realize that, you are a fool. If you do, and you voted for him anyway for some batshit reason, then no one owes you or your opinions any respect. Period.

It's not holier than thou rhetoric. It's facts you don't want to face.

We all know that you think your sh*t don't stink, but it does like anyone else. You're the one missing a few nuts, dear. The simple fact that you thought just a few months ago that Biden was up to lead our country for another 4 years tells me everything I need to know about your intelligence. The fact is you're a stupid whiny loser who can't accept that people of United States have spoken. Insisting that you know better will not make it a fact.

Did you miss where is says "NP"? It says nothing in my post about Biden or anything else other than that Trump is not qualified (he's not) and that anyone who voted for him is a fool or batshit (also true). If you supported him, you don't get to cast aspersions about anyone's intelligence. Your post is a whole lot of typical MAGA-whiner projection. Every accusation is a confession. Reread your entire paragraph and apply to yourself, sweetheart.

Some of us are realists who can see that the country is going down the toilet, because too many people (like you, dear) were either hoodwinked by Trump or are just as much a POS as he is. We don't have to follow you down into the gutter.

Long time lurker on Politics which generally was a Liberal Democratic echo chamber. Since the election it is much more vibrant as Republicans are not hiding but responding to those who fancy themselves as the educated elites whose thinking is reasonable and kind. Their hubris is amusing.

Regardless of who is elite or not elite or who has hubris and who does not, macron and other world leaders flatter and stroke and kiss Trump's ass to try to get what they want. Trump is not that hard of a person to figure out.

He really isn't. Which makes it amusing. Everyone is being so deferential to Trump - from Trudeau to Macron. I wonder if they hate themselves at the end of day.

For Zelensky, it's a life and death situation for his country. And he's an actor to begin with. I'm sure he's going full Shakespeare presently.

Zelensky already has: “a tale told by a fool, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive and even Trump's presence there cannot ruin it. It was their way before Trump came along and it will be there way after he is long gone.

See? What did I just say? Always try to find something negative to say.

It's not negative. It's positive. This day is about Notre Dame and the restoration. This day is not about Trump. Pope Francis had it right. Let the cathedral be the center of attention.

So why say that his presence could not ruin the day and mention his mortality. That's pretty negative to me. You could have just stopped at "Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive"

I didn't start this thread about Trump at Notre Dame. Blame that on the op.

Why should I blame the OP? The thread is in the political forum so of course it's appropriate to discuss Trump at Notre-Dame ceremony. You were negative about Trump when you wrote that he couldn't ruin the day (why would you think he could ruin the day in the first place unless you have a pre-conceived negative opinion about him?). Then you proceeded to mention his mortality. Sure, everyone dies, but why mention it during a happy occasion? I'm sure you don't go around at a wedding and say the happy couple will outlive their parents, right? You do have more common sense than that, right?

You act like there was some secret message here. I don't think Trump's presence at this ceremony elevates him or this country or the cathedral. I think it's blatant pandering because that's how you get what you want from this guy. You think it's impressive in some way. We disagree and that's allowed. It's a forum.

You're allowed to say whatever you want but just don't deny that the original comment was negative. We see respect, you see pandering. That's fine. But that's negative.

And T is a fount of positivity? He's pledged retribution and dictatorship, and has indicated he won't hire anyone who won't pledge blind loyalty to him at the expense of our nation's constitution. How dare you chide us to be positive. Your leader and (sadly) our future President isn't. At all.

Why do you have to answer everything with what about Trump? We're talking about you people always trying to find something negative to say about Trump and then denying it. That was the point of that convo. I guess, deep down you want just to be like him since you keep on trying to be as "negative" as he is.

And, how dare you accuse me of pledging blind loyalty to Trump at the expense of our constitution? I have my reason to support him and you have your reasons to support someone else. That doesn't make me naive/stupid and you enlightened. Sick of hearing your holier than thou rhetoric that you hold the Universal truth while people who don't agree with you are stupid.

NP. If you support Trump, we know you have no intelligence and/or no integrity. He is an absolutely awful human being who is not remotely qualified to be POTUS. If you don't realize that, you are a fool. If you do, and you voted for him anyway for some batshit reason, then no one owes you or your opinions any respect. Period.

It's not holier than thou rhetoric. It's facts you don't want to face.

We all know that you think your sh*t don't stink, but it does like anyone else. You're the one missing a few nuts, dear. The simple fact that you thought just a few months ago that Biden was up to lead our country for another 4 years tells me everything I need to know about your intelligence. The fact is you're a stupid whiny loser who can't accept that people of United States have spoken. Insisting that you know better will not make it a fact.

Did you miss where is says "NP"? It says nothing in my post about Biden or anything else other than that Trump is not qualified (he's not) and that anyone who voted for him is a fool or batshit (also true). If you supported him, you don't get to cast aspersions about anyone's intelligence. Your post is a whole lot of typical MAGA-whiner projection. Every accusation is a confession. Reread your entire paragraph and apply to yourself, sweetheart.

Some of us are realists who can see that the country is going down the toilet, because too many people (like you, dear) were either hoodwinked by Trump or are just as much a POS as he is. We don't have to follow you down into the gutter.

Long time lurker on Politics which generally was a Liberal Democratic echo chamber. Since the election it is much more vibrant as Republicans are not hiding but responding to those who fancy themselves as the educated elites whose thinking is reasonable and kind. Their hubris is amusing.

I might accept this and even welcome it if their responses were facts and truth about who they elected. I’ve yet to read a response that decodes Trump’s monotonous word salad. They never respond to common sense questions or facts. Crickets. Most don’t absorb anything but Fox & Truth Social. Other than double standards. They have no game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Trump meets with William, Prince of Wales and future King of England.

That’s great. We already know Trump met Prince Andrew on the island.

Was that the trip with Bill Clinton and Al Gore?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive and even Trump's presence there cannot ruin it. It was their way before Trump came along and it will be there way after he is long gone.

See? What did I just say? Always try to find something negative to say.

It's not negative. It's positive. This day is about Notre Dame and the restoration. This day is not about Trump. Pope Francis had it right. Let the cathedral be the center of attention.

So why say that his presence could not ruin the day and mention his mortality. That's pretty negative to me. You could have just stopped at "Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive"

I didn't start this thread about Trump at Notre Dame. Blame that on the op.

Why should I blame the OP? The thread is in the political forum so of course it's appropriate to discuss Trump at Notre-Dame ceremony. You were negative about Trump when you wrote that he couldn't ruin the day (why would you think he could ruin the day in the first place unless you have a pre-conceived negative opinion about him?). Then you proceeded to mention his mortality. Sure, everyone dies, but why mention it during a happy occasion? I'm sure you don't go around at a wedding and say the happy couple will outlive their parents, right? You do have more common sense than that, right?

You act like there was some secret message here. I don't think Trump's presence at this ceremony elevates him or this country or the cathedral. I think it's blatant pandering because that's how you get what you want from this guy. You think it's impressive in some way. We disagree and that's allowed. It's a forum.

You're allowed to say whatever you want but just don't deny that the original comment was negative. We see respect, you see pandering. That's fine. But that's negative.

And T is a fount of positivity? He's pledged retribution and dictatorship, and has indicated he won't hire anyone who won't pledge blind loyalty to him at the expense of our nation's constitution. How dare you chide us to be positive. Your leader and (sadly) our future President isn't. At all.

Why do you have to answer everything with what about Trump? We're talking about you people always trying to find something negative to say about Trump and then denying it. That was the point of that convo. I guess, deep down you want just to be like him since you keep on trying to be as "negative" as he is.

And, how dare you accuse me of pledging blind loyalty to Trump at the expense of our constitution? I have my reason to support him and you have your reasons to support someone else. That doesn't make me naive/stupid and you enlightened. Sick of hearing your holier than thou rhetoric that you hold the Universal truth while people who don't agree with you are stupid.

NP. If you support Trump, we know you have no intelligence and/or no integrity. He is an absolutely awful human being who is not remotely qualified to be POTUS. If you don't realize that, you are a fool. If you do, and you voted for him anyway for some batshit reason, then no one owes you or your opinions any respect. Period.

It's not holier than thou rhetoric. It's facts you don't want to face.

We all know that you think your sh*t don't stink, but it does like anyone else. You're the one missing a few nuts, dear. The simple fact that you thought just a few months ago that Biden was up to lead our country for another 4 years tells me everything I need to know about your intelligence. The fact is you're a stupid whiny loser who can't accept that people of United States have spoken. Insisting that you know better will not make it a fact.

Did you miss where is says "NP"? It says nothing in my post about Biden or anything else other than that Trump is not qualified (he's not) and that anyone who voted for him is a fool or batshit (also true). If you supported him, you don't get to cast aspersions about anyone's intelligence. Your post is a whole lot of typical MAGA-whiner projection. Every accusation is a confession. Reread your entire paragraph and apply to yourself, sweetheart.

Some of us are realists who can see that the country is going down the toilet, because too many people (like you, dear) were either hoodwinked by Trump or are just as much a POS as he is. We don't have to follow you down into the gutter.

Long time lurker on Politics which generally was a Liberal Democratic echo chamber. Since the election it is much more vibrant as Republicans are not hiding but responding to those who fancy themselves as the educated elites whose thinking is reasonable and kind. Their hubris is amusing.

Regardless of who is elite or not elite or who has hubris and who does not, macron and other world leaders flatter and stroke and kiss Trump's ass to try to get what they want. Trump is not that hard of a person to figure out.

Jill was the one looking to kiss Trump's ass. Too funny!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive and even Trump's presence there cannot ruin it. It was their way before Trump came along and it will be there way after he is long gone.

See? What did I just say? Always try to find something negative to say.

It's not negative. It's positive. This day is about Notre Dame and the restoration. This day is not about Trump. Pope Francis had it right. Let the cathedral be the center of attention.

So why say that his presence could not ruin the day and mention his mortality. That's pretty negative to me. You could have just stopped at "Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive"

I didn't start this thread about Trump at Notre Dame. Blame that on the op.

Why should I blame the OP? The thread is in the political forum so of course it's appropriate to discuss Trump at Notre-Dame ceremony. You were negative about Trump when you wrote that he couldn't ruin the day (why would you think he could ruin the day in the first place unless you have a pre-conceived negative opinion about him?). Then you proceeded to mention his mortality. Sure, everyone dies, but why mention it during a happy occasion? I'm sure you don't go around at a wedding and say the happy couple will outlive their parents, right? You do have more common sense than that, right?

You act like there was some secret message here. I don't think Trump's presence at this ceremony elevates him or this country or the cathedral. I think it's blatant pandering because that's how you get what you want from this guy. You think it's impressive in some way. We disagree and that's allowed. It's a forum.

You're allowed to say whatever you want but just don't deny that the original comment was negative. We see respect, you see pandering. That's fine. But that's negative.

And T is a fount of positivity? He's pledged retribution and dictatorship, and has indicated he won't hire anyone who won't pledge blind loyalty to him at the expense of our nation's constitution. How dare you chide us to be positive. Your leader and (sadly) our future President isn't. At all.

Why do you have to answer everything with what about Trump? We're talking about you people always trying to find something negative to say about Trump and then denying it. That was the point of that convo. I guess, deep down you want just to be like him since you keep on trying to be as "negative" as he is.

And, how dare you accuse me of pledging blind loyalty to Trump at the expense of our constitution? I have my reason to support him and you have your reasons to support someone else. That doesn't make me naive/stupid and you enlightened. Sick of hearing your holier than thou rhetoric that you hold the Universal truth while people who don't agree with you are stupid.

NP. If you support Trump, we know you have no intelligence and/or no integrity. He is an absolutely awful human being who is not remotely qualified to be POTUS. If you don't realize that, you are a fool. If you do, and you voted for him anyway for some batshit reason, then no one owes you or your opinions any respect. Period.

It's not holier than thou rhetoric. It's facts you don't want to face.

We all know that you think your sh*t don't stink, but it does like anyone else. You're the one missing a few nuts, dear. The simple fact that you thought just a few months ago that Biden was up to lead our country for another 4 years tells me everything I need to know about your intelligence. The fact is you're a stupid whiny loser who can't accept that people of United States have spoken. Insisting that you know better will not make it a fact.

Did you miss where is says "NP"? It says nothing in my post about Biden or anything else other than that Trump is not qualified (he's not) and that anyone who voted for him is a fool or batshit (also true). If you supported him, you don't get to cast aspersions about anyone's intelligence. Your post is a whole lot of typical MAGA-whiner projection. Every accusation is a confession. Reread your entire paragraph and apply to yourself, sweetheart.

Some of us are realists who can see that the country is going down the toilet, because too many people (like you, dear) were either hoodwinked by Trump or are just as much a POS as he is. We don't have to follow you down into the gutter.

Long time lurker on Politics which generally was a Liberal Democratic echo chamber. Since the election it is much more vibrant as Republicans are not hiding but responding to those who fancy themselves as the educated elites whose thinking is reasonable and kind. Their hubris is amusing.

Regardless of who is elite or not elite or who has hubris and who does not, macron and other world leaders flatter and stroke and kiss Trump's ass to try to get what they want. Trump is not that hard of a person to figure out.

Jill was the one looking to kiss Trump's ass. Too funny!

Jill and anyone else that wants something from that fool. It's funny but it's not because he is so shallow and transparent but he is in a very powerful position. It's not really to this country's advantage to have such a thin-skinned, easily manipulated, individual as the president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive and even Trump's presence there cannot ruin it. It was their way before Trump came along and it will be there way after he is long gone.

See? What did I just say? Always try to find something negative to say.

It's not negative. It's positive. This day is about Notre Dame and the restoration. This day is not about Trump. Pope Francis had it right. Let the cathedral be the center of attention.

So why say that his presence could not ruin the day and mention his mortality. That's pretty negative to me. You could have just stopped at "Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive"

I didn't start this thread about Trump at Notre Dame. Blame that on the op.

Why should I blame the OP? The thread is in the political forum so of course it's appropriate to discuss Trump at Notre-Dame ceremony. You were negative about Trump when you wrote that he couldn't ruin the day (why would you think he could ruin the day in the first place unless you have a pre-conceived negative opinion about him?). Then you proceeded to mention his mortality. Sure, everyone dies, but why mention it during a happy occasion? I'm sure you don't go around at a wedding and say the happy couple will outlive their parents, right? You do have more common sense than that, right?

You act like there was some secret message here. I don't think Trump's presence at this ceremony elevates him or this country or the cathedral. I think it's blatant pandering because that's how you get what you want from this guy. You think it's impressive in some way. We disagree and that's allowed. It's a forum.

You're allowed to say whatever you want but just don't deny that the original comment was negative. We see respect, you see pandering. That's fine. But that's negative.

And T is a fount of positivity? He's pledged retribution and dictatorship, and has indicated he won't hire anyone who won't pledge blind loyalty to him at the expense of our nation's constitution. How dare you chide us to be positive. Your leader and (sadly) our future President isn't. At all.

Why do you have to answer everything with what about Trump? We're talking about you people always trying to find something negative to say about Trump and then denying it. That was the point of that convo. I guess, deep down you want just to be like him since you keep on trying to be as "negative" as he is.

And, how dare you accuse me of pledging blind loyalty to Trump at the expense of our constitution? I have my reason to support him and you have your reasons to support someone else. That doesn't make me naive/stupid and you enlightened. Sick of hearing your holier than thou rhetoric that you hold the Universal truth while people who don't agree with you are stupid.

NP. If you support Trump, we know you have no intelligence and/or no integrity. He is an absolutely awful human being who is not remotely qualified to be POTUS. If you don't realize that, you are a fool. If you do, and you voted for him anyway for some batshit reason, then no one owes you or your opinions any respect. Period.

It's not holier than thou rhetoric. It's facts you don't want to face.

We all know that you think your sh*t don't stink, but it does like anyone else. You're the one missing a few nuts, dear. The simple fact that you thought just a few months ago that Biden was up to lead our country for another 4 years tells me everything I need to know about your intelligence. The fact is you're a stupid whiny loser who can't accept that people of United States have spoken. Insisting that you know better will not make it a fact.

Did you miss where is says "NP"? It says nothing in my post about Biden or anything else other than that Trump is not qualified (he's not) and that anyone who voted for him is a fool or batshit (also true). If you supported him, you don't get to cast aspersions about anyone's intelligence. Your post is a whole lot of typical MAGA-whiner projection. Every accusation is a confession. Reread your entire paragraph and apply to yourself, sweetheart.

Some of us are realists who can see that the country is going down the toilet, because too many people (like you, dear) were either hoodwinked by Trump or are just as much a POS as he is. We don't have to follow you down into the gutter.

Long time lurker on Politics which generally was a Liberal Democratic echo chamber. Since the election it is much more vibrant as Republicans are not hiding but responding to those who fancy themselves as the educated elites whose thinking is reasonable and kind. Their hubris is amusing.

Regardless of who is elite or not elite or who has hubris and who does not, macron and other world leaders flatter and stroke and kiss Trump's ass to try to get what they want. Trump is not that hard of a person to figure out.

Jill was the one looking to kiss Trump's ass. Too funny!

DP. She was being polite. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive and even Trump's presence there cannot ruin it. It was their way before Trump came along and it will be there way after he is long gone.

See? What did I just say? Always try to find something negative to say.

It's not negative. It's positive. This day is about Notre Dame and the restoration. This day is not about Trump. Pope Francis had it right. Let the cathedral be the center of attention.

So why say that his presence could not ruin the day and mention his mortality. That's pretty negative to me. You could have just stopped at "Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive"

I didn't start this thread about Trump at Notre Dame. Blame that on the op.

Why should I blame the OP? The thread is in the political forum so of course it's appropriate to discuss Trump at Notre-Dame ceremony. You were negative about Trump when you wrote that he couldn't ruin the day (why would you think he could ruin the day in the first place unless you have a pre-conceived negative opinion about him?). Then you proceeded to mention his mortality. Sure, everyone dies, but why mention it during a happy occasion? I'm sure you don't go around at a wedding and say the happy couple will outlive their parents, right? You do have more common sense than that, right?

You act like there was some secret message here. I don't think Trump's presence at this ceremony elevates him or this country or the cathedral. I think it's blatant pandering because that's how you get what you want from this guy. You think it's impressive in some way. We disagree and that's allowed. It's a forum.

You're allowed to say whatever you want but just don't deny that the original comment was negative. We see respect, you see pandering. That's fine. But that's negative.

And T is a fount of positivity? He's pledged retribution and dictatorship, and has indicated he won't hire anyone who won't pledge blind loyalty to him at the expense of our nation's constitution. How dare you chide us to be positive. Your leader and (sadly) our future President isn't. At all.

Why do you have to answer everything with what about Trump? We're talking about you people always trying to find something negative to say about Trump and then denying it. That was the point of that convo. I guess, deep down you want just to be like him since you keep on trying to be as "negative" as he is.

And, how dare you accuse me of pledging blind loyalty to Trump at the expense of our constitution? I have my reason to support him and you have your reasons to support someone else. That doesn't make me naive/stupid and you enlightened. Sick of hearing your holier than thou rhetoric that you hold the Universal truth while people who don't agree with you are stupid.

NP. If you support Trump, we know you have no intelligence and/or no integrity. He is an absolutely awful human being who is not remotely qualified to be POTUS. If you don't realize that, you are a fool. If you do, and you voted for him anyway for some batshit reason, then no one owes you or your opinions any respect. Period.

It's not holier than thou rhetoric. It's facts you don't want to face.

We all know that you think your sh*t don't stink, but it does like anyone else. You're the one missing a few nuts, dear. The simple fact that you thought just a few months ago that Biden was up to lead our country for another 4 years tells me everything I need to know about your intelligence. The fact is you're a stupid whiny loser who can't accept that people of United States have spoken. Insisting that you know better will not make it a fact.

Did you miss where is says "NP"? It says nothing in my post about Biden or anything else other than that Trump is not qualified (he's not) and that anyone who voted for him is a fool or batshit (also true). If you supported him, you don't get to cast aspersions about anyone's intelligence. Your post is a whole lot of typical MAGA-whiner projection. Every accusation is a confession. Reread your entire paragraph and apply to yourself, sweetheart.

Some of us are realists who can see that the country is going down the toilet, because too many people (like you, dear) were either hoodwinked by Trump or are just as much a POS as he is. We don't have to follow you down into the gutter.

Long time lurker on Politics which generally was a Liberal Democratic echo chamber. Since the election it is much more vibrant as Republicans are not hiding but responding to those who fancy themselves as the educated elites whose thinking is reasonable and kind. Their hubris is amusing.

Regardless of who is elite or not elite or who has hubris and who does not, macron and other world leaders flatter and stroke and kiss Trump's ass to try to get what they want. Trump is not that hard of a person to figure out.

Jill was the one looking to kiss Trump's ass. Too funny!

DP. She was being polite. Period.

Yeah. Sure. Look at the look on her face.
You folks try to deny everything

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Trump meets with William, Prince of Wales and future King of England.

That’s great. We already know Trump met Prince Andrew on the island.

Was that the trip with Bill Clinton and Al Gore?

Interesting that you can’t deny it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive and even Trump's presence there cannot ruin it. It was their way before Trump came along and it will be there way after he is long gone.

See? What did I just say? Always try to find something negative to say.

It's not negative. It's positive. This day is about Notre Dame and the restoration. This day is not about Trump. Pope Francis had it right. Let the cathedral be the center of attention.

So why say that his presence could not ruin the day and mention his mortality. That's pretty negative to me. You could have just stopped at "Notre Dame it's quite beautiful. The restoration is impressive"

I didn't start this thread about Trump at Notre Dame. Blame that on the op.

Why should I blame the OP? The thread is in the political forum so of course it's appropriate to discuss Trump at Notre-Dame ceremony. You were negative about Trump when you wrote that he couldn't ruin the day (why would you think he could ruin the day in the first place unless you have a pre-conceived negative opinion about him?). Then you proceeded to mention his mortality. Sure, everyone dies, but why mention it during a happy occasion? I'm sure you don't go around at a wedding and say the happy couple will outlive their parents, right? You do have more common sense than that, right?

You act like there was some secret message here. I don't think Trump's presence at this ceremony elevates him or this country or the cathedral. I think it's blatant pandering because that's how you get what you want from this guy. You think it's impressive in some way. We disagree and that's allowed. It's a forum.

You're allowed to say whatever you want but just don't deny that the original comment was negative. We see respect, you see pandering. That's fine. But that's negative.

And T is a fount of positivity? He's pledged retribution and dictatorship, and has indicated he won't hire anyone who won't pledge blind loyalty to him at the expense of our nation's constitution. How dare you chide us to be positive. Your leader and (sadly) our future President isn't. At all.

Why do you have to answer everything with what about Trump? We're talking about you people always trying to find something negative to say about Trump and then denying it. That was the point of that convo. I guess, deep down you want just to be like him since you keep on trying to be as "negative" as he is.

And, how dare you accuse me of pledging blind loyalty to Trump at the expense of our constitution? I have my reason to support him and you have your reasons to support someone else. That doesn't make me naive/stupid and you enlightened. Sick of hearing your holier than thou rhetoric that you hold the Universal truth while people who don't agree with you are stupid.

NP. If you support Trump, we know you have no intelligence and/or no integrity. He is an absolutely awful human being who is not remotely qualified to be POTUS. If you don't realize that, you are a fool. If you do, and you voted for him anyway for some batshit reason, then no one owes you or your opinions any respect. Period.

It's not holier than thou rhetoric. It's facts you don't want to face.

We all know that you think your sh*t don't stink, but it does like anyone else. You're the one missing a few nuts, dear. The simple fact that you thought just a few months ago that Biden was up to lead our country for another 4 years tells me everything I need to know about your intelligence. The fact is you're a stupid whiny loser who can't accept that people of United States have spoken. Insisting that you know better will not make it a fact.

Did you miss where is says "NP"? It says nothing in my post about Biden or anything else other than that Trump is not qualified (he's not) and that anyone who voted for him is a fool or batshit (also true). If you supported him, you don't get to cast aspersions about anyone's intelligence. Your post is a whole lot of typical MAGA-whiner projection. Every accusation is a confession. Reread your entire paragraph and apply to yourself, sweetheart.

Some of us are realists who can see that the country is going down the toilet, because too many people (like you, dear) were either hoodwinked by Trump or are just as much a POS as he is. We don't have to follow you down into the gutter.

Long time lurker on Politics which generally was a Liberal Democratic echo chamber. Since the election it is much more vibrant as Republicans are not hiding but responding to those who fancy themselves as the educated elites whose thinking is reasonable and kind. Their hubris is amusing.

Regardless of who is elite or not elite or who has hubris and who does not, macron and other world leaders flatter and stroke and kiss Trump's ass to try to get what they want. Trump is not that hard of a person to figure out.

Jill was the one looking to kiss Trump's ass. Too funny!

They’re all on the same side in the end. They’re just laughing at us.