Banning AR-15s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody is banning semiautomatics.

So sorry NRA. We most certainly have, can and will.

i'd like to see you try

What are you going to do? Shake your fist and whine on a message board?

Honestly, the only ones shaking fists and whining are the anti-gun nuts here…we’re gonna take away your guns, we’re going after your ammunition, etc. But the only thing you have actually accomplished in recent memory is driving gun sales sky high. You’re strategy needs a serious rethink.

Your crowd is the one threatening civil war like a bunch of clowns. No chance that any but the craziest of you ever raise your guns in revolt. You'll just whine from your front porch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at crime in the DMV, multiple perpetrators possibly high on narcotics. AR-15 is a sensible weapon. May take 3-4 shots per perp to take control of the situation. Reloading under stress is a bad idea.

You're deranged, Rambo-wannabe.

After BLM riot and lawless time I think need for firearm is evident

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at crime in the DMV, multiple perpetrators possibly high on narcotics. AR-15 is a sensible weapon. May take 3-4 shots per perp to take control of the situation. Reloading under stress is a bad idea.

You're deranged, Rambo-wannabe.

After BLM riot and lawless time I think need for firearm is evident

You mean the "2020 Summer of Love" sponsored by the DNC?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at crime in the DMV, multiple perpetrators possibly high on narcotics. AR-15 is a sensible weapon. May take 3-4 shots per perp to take control of the situation. Reloading under stress is a bad idea.

You're deranged, Rambo-wannabe.

After BLM riot and lawless time I think need for firearm is evident

You mean the "2020 Summer of Love" sponsored by the DNC?

2.5 billion of peaceful

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody is banning semiautomatics.

So sorry NRA. We most certainly have, can and will.

i'd like to see you try

What are you going to do? Shake your fist and whine on a message board?

Honestly, the only ones shaking fists and whining are the anti-gun nuts here…we’re gonna take away your guns, we’re going after your ammunition, etc. But the only thing you have actually accomplished in recent memory is driving gun sales sky high. You’re strategy needs a serious rethink.

Your crowd is the one threatening civil war like a bunch of clowns. No chance that any but the craziest of you ever raise your guns in revolt. You'll just whine from your front porch.

There are hundreds of millions of firearms in this country owned by tens of millions of households. Dazzle us with details for exactly how you think you are going to undo that.

Even if you could get legislation through the House, Senate, and White House (good luck with that), what is the next step? If you think gun owners are just going to voluntarily turn in all of those guns, i can’t help but wonder if we’re living in the same country. Have you met people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody is banning semiautomatics.

So sorry NRA. We most certainly have, can and will.

i'd like to see you try

What are you going to do? Shake your fist and whine on a message board?

Honestly, the only ones shaking fists and whining are the anti-gun nuts here…we’re gonna take away your guns, we’re going after your ammunition, etc. But the only thing you have actually accomplished in recent memory is driving gun sales sky high. You’re strategy needs a serious rethink.

Your crowd is the one threatening civil war like a bunch of clowns. No chance that any but the craziest of you ever raise your guns in revolt. You'll just whine from your front porch.

Most of you will just whine but take the cash anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:AR-15s should be confiscated.
They have no place in a civilized nation. None.
They are weapons of racism. White supremacists love them because they give these weak people a feeling of power. They have no reason to feel superior in their lives, so they look to their skin color to give them some feeling of superiority, irrational as that concept is.
Confiscate all AR-15s in the USA today. We'll have far fewer mass shootings. Horrible that people like the PP are defending these horrific weapons of mass killing.
Get rid of them now.
If you need a gun, get a shotgun.

Fat chance. Go watch your Reid Out MSNBC show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AR-15s should be confiscated.
They have no place in a civilized nation. None.
They are weapons of racism. White supremacists love them because they give these weak people a feeling of power. They have no reason to feel superior in their lives, so they look to their skin color to give them some feeling of superiority, irrational as that concept is.
Confiscate all AR-15s in the USA today. We'll have far fewer mass shootings. Horrible that people like the PP are defending these horrific weapons of mass killing.
Get rid of them now.
If you need a gun, get a shotgun.

Fat chance. Go watch your Reid Out MSNBC show.

The fat chance is fat cash rewards. You will crumble and take the money when the time comes.

Look at countries that have done it. That will be a good use of our tax money instead of spending big bucks to arm police departments like mini military units and then they are still afraid to go up against these ridiculous weapons. Hi uvalde police.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AR-15s should be confiscated.
They have no place in a civilized nation. None.
They are weapons of racism. White supremacists love them because they give these weak people a feeling of power. They have no reason to feel superior in their lives, so they look to their skin color to give them some feeling of superiority, irrational as that concept is.
Confiscate all AR-15s in the USA today. We'll have far fewer mass shootings. Horrible that people like the PP are defending these horrific weapons of mass killing.
Get rid of them now.
If you need a gun, get a shotgun.

Fat chance. Go watch your Reid Out MSNBC show.

The fat chance is fat cash rewards. You will crumble and take the money when the time comes.

Look at countries that have done it. That will be a good use of our tax money instead of spending big bucks to arm police departments like mini military units and then they are still afraid to go up against these ridiculous weapons. Hi uvalde police.

As Arrowsmith sang, Dream On!
USA isn't other countries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AR-15s should be confiscated.
They have no place in a civilized nation. None.
They are weapons of racism. White supremacists love them because they give these weak people a feeling of power. They have no reason to feel superior in their lives, so they look to their skin color to give them some feeling of superiority, irrational as that concept is.
Confiscate all AR-15s in the USA today. We'll have far fewer mass shootings. Horrible that people like the PP are defending these horrific weapons of mass killing.
Get rid of them now.
If you need a gun, get a shotgun.

Fat chance. Go watch your Reid Out MSNBC show.

The fat chance is fat cash rewards. You will crumble and take the money when the time comes.

Look at countries that have done it. That will be a good use of our tax money instead of spending big bucks to arm police departments like mini military units and then they are still afraid to go up against these ridiculous weapons. Hi uvalde police.

As Arrowsmith sang, Dream On!
USA isn't other countries.

Money is money in the USA and elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at crime in the DMV, multiple perpetrators possibly high on narcotics. AR-15 is a sensible weapon. May take 3-4 shots per perp to take control of the situation. Reloading under stress is a bad idea.

You're deranged, Rambo-wannabe.

After BLM riot and lawless time I think need for firearm is evident

You mean the "2020 Summer of Love" sponsored by the DNC?

And AR-15s relate how? What, we should just start gunning down anyone who protests? Should we have gunned down the 1500 MAGAs who stormed the Capitol on J6 too?

[Anonymous]

America, land of the free and easy ability for criminals to buy guns and traffic them all over the country.

Straw purchases abound primarily in (checks notes) red states who don't do jack to crack down on the illegal gun trafficking in their states.

Law and order for thee, but not for me!
-Every red state

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at crime in the DMV, multiple perpetrators possibly high on narcotics. AR-15 is a sensible weapon. May take 3-4 shots per perp to take control of the situation. Reloading under stress is a bad idea.

You're deranged, Rambo-wannabe.

After BLM riot and lawless time I think need for firearm is evident

Kyle Rittenhouse defended himself from rioters with AR-15

You mean the "2020 Summer of Love" sponsored by the DNC?

And AR-15s relate how? What, we should just start gunning down anyone who protests? Should we have gunned down the 1500 MAGAs who stormed the Capitol on J6 too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at crime in the DMV, multiple perpetrators possibly high on narcotics. AR-15 is a sensible weapon. May take 3-4 shots per perp to take control of the situation. Reloading under stress is a bad idea.

You're deranged, Rambo-wannabe.

After BLM riot and lawless time I think need for firearm is evident

You mean the "2020 Summer of Love" sponsored by the DNC?

And AR-15s relate how? What, we should just start gunning down anyone who protests? Should we have gunned down the 1500 MAGAs who stormed the Capitol on J6 too?

Kyle Rittenhouse defended himself from rioters with AR-15

No ar15 used at j6

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at crime in the DMV, multiple perpetrators possibly high on narcotics. AR-15 is a sensible weapon. May take 3-4 shots per perp to take control of the situation. Reloading under stress is a bad idea.

You're deranged, Rambo-wannabe.

After BLM riot and lawless time I think need for firearm is evident

You mean the "2020 Summer of Love" sponsored by the DNC?

And AR-15s relate how? What, we should just start gunning down anyone who protests? Should we have gunned down the 1500 MAGAs who stormed the Capitol on J6 too?

Kyle Rittenhouse defended himself from rioters with AR-15

No ar15 used at j6

If he did not have that stupid weapon the people he killed would still be alive. And so would he.