Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Not only did they tamper with witnesses, they put it in writing.

Was this the brand new information that necessitated the short notice hearing?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Next, witness intimidation.



Yup. The Committee is sending a warning to anyone engaging in that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Other bombshells:

1. Trump KNEW some of the "peaceful protesters" were carrying weapons of different kinds, and

2. He asked for the metal detectors that are part of the security system protecting the Capitol and that screen for weapons to be removed!

WTF?


Important to note that he said the metal detectors could come down because the people with weapons weren't going to hurt HIM.

I have already said this in the thread, but it’s clear that the GOP knew what they were planning, but they thought it would go faster. All the non-fascist Capitol Police who repelled the insurrectionists did their part to ensure the continued existence of the GOP.

+1 And DC’s Metropolitan Police Department who answered their call for assistance.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not only did they tamper with witnesses, they put it in writing.

Was this the brand new information that necessitated the short notice hearing?


No. But the fact that Trump knew about armed protesters and wanted to facilitate their attack on the Capitol did.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not only did they tamper with witnesses, they put it in writing.

Was this the brand new information that necessitated the short notice hearing?


Probably. It's known that Hutchinson received threats, so intimidation probably hastened her testimony. Or maybe she didn't want to testify publicly, but intimidation made her change her mind.

Anonymous
So this wasn't tourists or Antifa and it wasn't spontaneous.

What other lies did the GOP have its cultists spew?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, can we talk again about Trump GRABBING THE STEERING WHEEL LIKE A DERANGED TODDLER?



Sounded like Trump had more contact with the Secret Service agent than the man who slapped Giuliani on the back did.
Anonymous
This thread was great. Can we do a new one with each hearing? It was fun to read real time.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Other bombshells:

1. Trump KNEW some of the "peaceful protesters" were carrying weapons of different kinds, and

2. He asked for the metal detectors that are part of the security system protecting the Capitol and that screen for weapons to be removed!

WTF?


Important to note that he said the metal detectors could come down because the people with weapons weren't going to hurt HIM.

I have already said this in the thread, but it’s clear that the GOP knew what they were planning, but they thought it would go faster. All the non-fascist Capitol Police who repelled the insurrectionists did their part to ensure the continued existence of the GOP.



He is a sociopath. He has no sense of conscience. He was okay with weapons being brought into the Capitol which could injure or kill lawmakers, LEOs, staff, etc.--presumably even people on his side of the aisle. In his mind, everything and everyone exists to be in service to him--he is not capable of caring about anyone outside of himself.

How can anyone believe that this person cares about the US and the American people? How can anyone even consider putting control of this nation back in his hands?
Anonymous
So what is the trump-lovers response to today? I know Fox isn’t covering it but I’m sure some of trump’s supporters have an explanation.
Anonymous
This is a criminal conspiracy y the GOP and Fox News. Where is DOJ?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote: “Mark, something needs to be done, or people are going to die and the blood's gonna be on your F'ing hands.” — Pat Cipollone to Mark Meadows
Meadows responded: "you heard him.. He doesn't think they're doing anything wrong"


This is just an astonishing quote.


How does this guy sleep at night? what a piece of work
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


Is it though? This is her account--who can corroborate? I believe every word she said, but is that enough evidence?
Anonymous
Was she actually there for any of this? From what I’m watching and hearing, she witnessed nothing personally and/or heard from someone else. Given this happened the way she said it did, why can’t the committee get first hand witnesses to testify?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: