|
http://healthland.time.com/2012/03/05/how-beyonces-public-breast-feeding-changes-the-nursing-in-public-debate/
I doubt anyone would complain about seeing her breasts. |
|
damm I was hoping to get a shot of those plump yummies....
who cares otherwise |
LMAO...Are you the "I'm a married lesbian Mom...ask me anything" OP? |
| It's cool she did this. It's sad that it garners this much attention and a headlines. News flash: mom out with hungry child feeds her in public. |
|
It appears she is breastfeeding in public but her boobs are not hanging out. It seems to me she was rather discreet and I respect that.
|
|
Awesome!
Even in this day and age, there are far too many people who are against nursing in public. I've been shocked by comments I've seen on friends (or friends' husbands) FB pages -- these are college educated people who somehow find it offensive. I truly don't get it. |
| Yes. Discreet, as in not trying to make a social statement. |
Your confirms that breasts are, indeed, sexual. We can't see them because she is covered and I doubt very much that she would ever nurse in public without being covered. |
|
Publicity whore.
I wish I could find that link where someone predicted that once her surrogate gave birth she'd be using the baby to get publicity about how she breast feeds, how she lost weight, etc. There were some other juicy bits posted as well (no pun intended). |
PP, where did this surrogate thing come from? Is this a fact? |
| Yaaawn. |
Idiot. PP said "predicted" |
+1 |
You sound unreasonably jealous. Beyonce is worth hundreds of millions; I doubt she needs publicity. Get pass your bitterness. Otherwise, you seem unhinged. |
How do you know, there are no pics. No one took a pic, there are only witnesses. |