EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her

A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

Angelina is a legend and huge with young women. She's an icon and extremely looked up to. And her kids all love her and hate their deadbeat, loser, abuser father. Angie wins <3

What iconic films has Angelina starred in? All of her films suck. She’s never starred in a movie that’s been nominated for a Best Picture Oscar. She was a talentless “B” movie actress who only kept her name in the news by publicizing her personal life. Now that she’s old and ugly, the roles have dried up. She tried directing, but she sucks at it too. She tried creating a fashion house, but it’s a flop because she has no sense of style. She’s a talentless, old washed up hag who doesn’t want to work. She only wants to b***h about her ex-husband and live off his money. She needed her ex-husband to loan her money to buy a house, since she’s a lazy, washed up wastrel who doesn’t work (just like her talentless nepo kids). Those kids are defective because of her bad parenting. Brad has made it clear he will have more kids with a normal, sane, good mom.

Lara Croft Tomb Raider? Classic! Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her

A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

And that is a sign of abuse. If she is the broke parent as you insist, why is he continuingly dragging her back into the court keeping that winery sale alive. What is his end objective, for he cannot get that portion of the winery back. That ship has sailed. Is it to bankrupt her. Great, you win because that is a sign of abuse to try and leave the mother of your children bankrupt.

Angelina broke the contract she and Brad had. She sold her shares to the winery behind his back. He woke up one morning to a press release that he had a new business partner that he had already turned down. The lawsuit is against Jolie, her former company Nouvel, and Stoli and its ownership. He is seeking to keep control of his winery and either undo the illegal sale or recoup monetary damages for the harm he has suffered as a result of the sale. The judge has already said Angelina failed to prove that they did not have an implied in fact contract. Brad can recoup damages from her for her illegal actions. She sought an unearned profit by selling her shares and gained money based on the money and work that he put into the winery. Angelina did nothing for the winery and harmed Brad and his partner Marc Perrin by selling her shares to a partner they don’t want involved in their business. It’s not abuse to sue someone who has harmed you. But you seem to believe Angelina can do whatever she wants and Brad just has to accept her malicious actions without fighting back.

Now you’re making things up, basically using kellyanne Conway alternative facts. No judge has ruled there was an implied contract. In fact, implied contracts are hard to prove due to ambiguity and what was intended along with consideration and more. If the judge had made that ruling, they still would not be litigating the merits of the case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We get why you don't like Brad but name one redeeming Angelina quality. I see nothing.

She loves and nurtures her children. Her children loves and adores her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her

A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

Angelina is a legend and huge with young women. She's an icon and extremely looked up to. And her kids all love her and hate their deadbeat, loser, abuser father. Angie wins <3

What iconic films has Angelina starred in? All of her films suck. She’s never starred in a movie that’s been nominated for a Best Picture Oscar. She was a talentless “B” movie actress who only kept her name in the news by publicizing her personal life. Now that she’s old and ugly, the roles have dried up. She tried directing, but she sucks at it too. She tried creating a fashion house, but it’s a flop because she has no sense of style. She’s a talentless, old washed up hag who doesn’t want to work. She only wants to b***h about her ex-husband and live off his money. She needed her ex-husband to loan her money to buy a house, since she’s a lazy, washed up wastrel who doesn’t work (just like her talentless nepo kids). Those kids are defective because of her bad parenting. Brad has made it clear he will have more kids with a normal, sane, good mom.

OMG, you’re an INCEL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her

A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

Angelina is a legend and huge with young women. She's an icon and extremely looked up to. And her kids all love her and hate their deadbeat, loser, abuser father. Angie wins <3

What iconic films has Angelina starred in? All of her films suck. She’s never starred in a movie that’s been nominated for a Best Picture Oscar. She was a talentless “B” movie actress who only kept her name in the news by publicizing her personal life. Now that she’s old and ugly, the roles have dried up. She tried directing, but she sucks at it too. She tried creating a fashion house, but it’s a flop because she has no sense of style. She’s a talentless, old washed up hag who doesn’t want to work. She only wants to b***h about her ex-husband and live off his money. She needed her ex-husband to loan her money to buy a house, since she’s a lazy, washed up wastrel who doesn’t work (just like her talentless nepo kids). Those kids are defective because of her bad parenting. Brad has made it clear he will have more kids with a normal, sane, good mom.

lmao this is just jealously at this point 😭 and once again kids aren't replaceable! You're just mad they aren't siding with him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her

A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

Angelina is a legend and huge with young women. She's an icon and extremely looked up to. And her kids all love her and hate their deadbeat, loser, abuser father. Angie wins <3

What iconic films has Angelina starred in? All of her films suck. She’s never starred in a movie that’s been nominated for a Best Picture Oscar. She was a talentless “B” movie actress who only kept her name in the news by publicizing her personal life. Now that she’s old and ugly, the roles have dried up. She tried directing, but she sucks at it too. She tried creating a fashion house, but it’s a flop because she has no sense of style. She’s a talentless, old washed up hag who doesn’t want to work. She only wants to b***h about her ex-husband and live off his money. She needed her ex-husband to loan her money to buy a house, since she’s a lazy, washed up wastrel who doesn’t work (just like her talentless nepo kids). Those kids are defective because of her bad parenting. Brad has made it clear he will have more kids with a normal, sane, good mom.

OMG, you’re an INCEL.

That part. They can pretend this has anything to do with the kids and they don't have animosity toward them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her

A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

And that is a sign of abuse. If she is the broke parent as you insist, why is he continuingly dragging her back into the court keeping that winery sale alive. What is his end objective, for he cannot get that portion of the winery back. That ship has sailed. Is it to bankrupt her. Great, you win because that is a sign of abuse to try and leave the mother of your children bankrupt.

Angelina broke the contract she and Brad had. She sold her shares to the winery behind his back. He woke up one morning to a press release that he had a new business partner that he had already turned down. The lawsuit is against Jolie, her former company Nouvel, and Stoli and its ownership. He is seeking to keep control of his winery and either undo the illegal sale or recoup monetary damages for the harm he has suffered as a result of the sale. The judge has already said Angelina failed to prove that they did not have an implied in fact contract. Brad can recoup damages from her for her illegal actions. She sought an unearned profit by selling her shares and gained money based on the money and work that he put into the winery. Angelina did nothing for the winery and harmed Brad and his partner Marc Perrin by selling her shares to a partner they don’t want involved in their business. It’s not abuse to sue someone who has harmed you. But you seem to believe Angelina can do whatever she wants and Brad just has to accept her malicious actions without fighting back.

Now you’re making things up, basically using kellyanne Conway alternative facts. No judge has ruled there was an implied contract. In fact, implied contracts are hard to prove due to ambiguity and what was intended along with consideration and more. If the judge had made that ruling, they still would not be litigating the merits of the case.

This part too! The judge specifically said the demurrer isn't the place to talk about the merits if the implied contract exist. That won't happen until the summary judgement which hasn't been filed yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her

A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

Angelina is a legend and huge with young women. She's an icon and extremely looked up to. And her kids all love her and hate their deadbeat, loser, abuser father. Angie wins <3

What iconic films has Angelina starred in? All of her films suck. She’s never starred in a movie that’s been nominated for a Best Picture Oscar. She was a talentless “B” movie actress who only kept her name in the news by publicizing her personal life. Now that she’s old and ugly, the roles have dried up. She tried directing, but she sucks at it too. She tried creating a fashion house, but it’s a flop because she has no sense of style. She’s a talentless, old washed up hag who doesn’t want to work. She only wants to b***h about her ex-husband and live off his money. She needed her ex-husband to loan her money to buy a house, since she’s a lazy, washed up wastrel who doesn’t work (just like her talentless nepo kids). Those kids are defective because of her bad parenting. Brad has made it clear he will have more kids with a normal, sane, good mom.

Lara Croft Tomb Raider? Classic! Lol

A forgotten film that received a 20% score on Rotten Tomatoes? A bad movie in a career of bad movies.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/search?search=Angelina%20jolie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her

A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

And that is a sign of abuse. If she is the broke parent as you insist, why is he continuingly dragging her back into the court keeping that winery sale alive. What is his end objective, for he cannot get that portion of the winery back. That ship has sailed. Is it to bankrupt her. Great, you win because that is a sign of abuse to try and leave the mother of your children bankrupt.

Angelina broke the contract she and Brad had. She sold her shares to the winery behind his back. He woke up one morning to a press release that he had a new business partner that he had already turned down. The lawsuit is against Jolie, her former company Nouvel, and Stoli and its ownership. He is seeking to keep control of his winery and either undo the illegal sale or recoup monetary damages for the harm he has suffered as a result of the sale. The judge has already said Angelina failed to prove that they did not have an implied in fact contract. Brad can recoup damages from her for her illegal actions. She sought an unearned profit by selling her shares and gained money based on the money and work that he put into the winery. Angelina did nothing for the winery and harmed Brad and his partner Marc Perrin by selling her shares to a partner they don’t want involved in their business. It’s not abuse to sue someone who has harmed you. But you seem to believe Angelina can do whatever she wants and Brad just has to accept her malicious actions without fighting back.

Now you’re making things up, basically using kellyanne Conway alternative facts. No judge has ruled there was an implied contract. In fact, implied contracts are hard to prove due to ambiguity and what was intended along with consideration and more. If the judge had made that ruling, they still would not be litigating the merits of the case.

The judge refused to throw out the claims against Angelina for breach of implied-in-fact contract and breach of quasi-contract. She said Brad had proven the elements of the contract. We will see at trial what a jury says, because Angelina should be ordered to pay damages to Brad for her illegal sale.

[Anonymous]

Shiloh has a job...I think maddox does too. Zahara is in college and looks like Pax is working on being in the digital arts. Why the hostility if they're actively doing things

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her

A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

And that is a sign of abuse. If she is the broke parent as you insist, why is he continuingly dragging her back into the court keeping that winery sale alive. What is his end objective, for he cannot get that portion of the winery back. That ship has sailed. Is it to bankrupt her. Great, you win because that is a sign of abuse to try and leave the mother of your children bankrupt.

Angelina broke the contract she and Brad had. She sold her shares to the winery behind his back. He woke up one morning to a press release that he had a new business partner that he had already turned down. The lawsuit is against Jolie, her former company Nouvel, and Stoli and its ownership. He is seeking to keep control of his winery and either undo the illegal sale or recoup monetary damages for the harm he has suffered as a result of the sale. The judge has already said Angelina failed to prove that they did not have an implied in fact contract. Brad can recoup damages from her for her illegal actions. She sought an unearned profit by selling her shares and gained money based on the money and work that he put into the winery. Angelina did nothing for the winery and harmed Brad and his partner Marc Perrin by selling her shares to a partner they don’t want involved in their business. It’s not abuse to sue someone who has harmed you. But you seem to believe Angelina can do whatever she wants and Brad just has to accept her malicious actions without fighting back.

Now you’re making things up, basically using kellyanne Conway alternative facts. No judge has ruled there was an implied contract. In fact, implied contracts are hard to prove due to ambiguity and what was intended along with consideration and more. If the judge had made that ruling, they still would not be litigating the merits of the case.

The judge refused to throw out the claims against Angelina for breach of implied-in-fact contract and breach of quasi-contract. She said Brad had proven the elements of the contract. We will see at trial what a jury says, because Angelina should be ordered to pay damages to Brad for her illegal sale.

No she didn't. At all. She said there could be a contract. They get to argue the merits of the case at the summary judgement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We get why you don't like Brad but name one redeeming Angelina quality. I see nothing.

She loves and nurtures her children. Her children loves and adores her.

That’s it? So, basic mom?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her

A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

And that is a sign of abuse. If she is the broke parent as you insist, why is he continuingly dragging her back into the court keeping that winery sale alive. What is his end objective, for he cannot get that portion of the winery back. That ship has sailed. Is it to bankrupt her. Great, you win because that is a sign of abuse to try and leave the mother of your children bankrupt.

Angelina broke the contract she and Brad had. She sold her shares to the winery behind his back. He woke up one morning to a press release that he had a new business partner that he had already turned down. The lawsuit is against Jolie, her former company Nouvel, and Stoli and its ownership. He is seeking to keep control of his winery and either undo the illegal sale or recoup monetary damages for the harm he has suffered as a result of the sale. The judge has already said Angelina failed to prove that they did not have an implied in fact contract. Brad can recoup damages from her for her illegal actions. She sought an unearned profit by selling her shares and gained money based on the money and work that he put into the winery. Angelina did nothing for the winery and harmed Brad and his partner Marc Perrin by selling her shares to a partner they don’t want involved in their business. It’s not abuse to sue someone who has harmed you. But you seem to believe Angelina can do whatever she wants and Brad just has to accept her malicious actions without fighting back.

Now you’re making things up, basically using kellyanne Conway alternative facts. No judge has ruled there was an implied contract. In fact, implied contracts are hard to prove due to ambiguity and what was intended along with consideration and more. If the judge had made that ruling, they still would not be litigating the merits of the case.

The judge refused to throw out the claims against Angelina for breach of implied-in-fact contract and breach of quasi-contract. She said Brad had proven the elements of the contract. We will see at trial what a jury says, because Angelina should be ordered to pay damages to Brad for her illegal sale.

No she didn't. At all. She said there could be a contract. They get to argue the merits of the case at the summary judgement.

Proof. "Regarding Defendant's factual arguments as to whether the parties' conduct actually resulted in a contract, the Court is not inclined to resolve this issue on demurrer." It's only that one could exist not that one actually did and a contract was actually formed.

And proof of shiloh. She helps with her dance studio but has worked for the past year or so. You only see kids as a tool to help Brad's image. If not you wouldn't be disparaging them all them time. You see relationships as transactional which is why you went straight to "when they need money/connections they will run back to him" not to reconnect based on a genuine relationship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Shiloh has a job...I think maddox does too. Zahara is in college and looks like Pax is working on being in the digital arts. Why the hostility if they're actively doing things

These are not the high expectations most upper middle class or beyond have for their kids. She is not a role model for any parent here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shiloh has a job...I think maddox does too. Zahara is in college and looks like Pax is working on being in the digital arts. Why the hostility if they're actively doing things

These are not the high expectations most upper middle class or beyond have for their kids. She is not a role model for any parent here.

How is having a job not high expectations? Get real. You're just mad they aren't on his side and won't play his games.