Kavanaugh Accuser reveals her Identity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

It may not have occurred. Hard to lie about something that didn’t happen.

Accuser passed a polygraph. An FBI polygraph.

Peter strozk’s FBI? Bob Mueller’s FBI? They have the credibility of Baghdad Bob...

Some of you traitors are really earning your new apartment in Moscow.

Name call all you want, and not to detract from the false accusation levied against nominee Kavanaugh, but the FBI is taking a justified beating over that hot mess.

I know this is screaming into the void but you have no idea that this accusation is false.

I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

She passed a polygraph and came forward BEFORE Kavanaugh had been selected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

It may not have occurred. Hard to lie about something that didn’t happen.

Accuser passed a polygraph. An FBI polygraph.

Peter strozk’s FBI? Bob Mueller’s FBI? They have the credibility of Baghdad Bob...

Some of you traitors are really earning your new apartment in Moscow.

Name call all you want, and not to detract from the false accusation levied against nominee Kavanaugh, but the FBI is taking a justified beating over that hot mess.

I know this is screaming into the void but you have no idea that this accusation is false.

I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

Translation: I did that all the time in HS and don't think it is assault.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

It may not have occurred. Hard to lie about something that didn’t happen.

Accuser passed a polygraph. An FBI polygraph.

Peter strozk’s FBI? Bob Mueller’s FBI? They have the credibility of Baghdad Bob...

Some of you traitors are really earning your new apartment in Moscow.

Name call all you want, and not to detract from the false accusation levied against nominee Kavanaugh, but the FBI is taking a justified beating over that hot mess.

I know this is screaming into the void but you have no idea that this accusation is false.

I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

She passed a polygraph and came forward BEFORE Kavanaugh had been selected.

None of what you said bears relevance on whether her story is true or not and he was already on the short list when she sent the letter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[
I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

Well sure. You want Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. You don't want to be the kind of person who supports a guy who would sexually assault a woman. Therefore, to avoid cognitive dissonance, it's imperative that she be lying. So your brain will find reasons to convince you that she's lying in order to avoid mental discomfort.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

It may not have occurred. Hard to lie about something that didn’t happen.

Accuser passed a polygraph. An FBI polygraph.

Peter strozk’s FBI? Bob Mueller’s FBI? They have the credibility of Baghdad Bob...

Some of you traitors are really earning your new apartment in Moscow.

Name call all you want, and not to detract from the false accusation levied against nominee Kavanaugh, but the FBI is taking a justified beating over that hot mess.

I know this is screaming into the void but you have no idea that this accusation is false.

I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

She passed a polygraph and came forward BEFORE Kavanaugh had been selected.

None of what you said bears relevance on whether her story is true or not and he was already on the short list when she sent the letter.

He wasn't on the short list during her therapy sessions in 2012.

Are you saying her doctor faked notes from 6 years ago at the risk of losing her license?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

Well sure. You want Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. You don't want to be the kind of person who supports a guy who would sexually assault a woman. Therefore, to avoid cognitive dissonance, it's imperative that she be lying. So your brain will find reasons to convince you that she's lying in order to avoid mental discomfort.

Oh, pp is in plenty of discomfort. He’ll drown it with his version of Soma.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

Well sure. You want Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. You don't want to be the kind of person who supports a guy who would sexually assault a woman. Therefore, to avoid cognitive dissonance, it's imperative that she be lying. So your brain will find reasons to convince you that she's lying in order to avoid mental discomfort.

She doesn’t have any evidence to prove her version of events. Until proven otherwise her story is just that, a story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

It may not have occurred. Hard to lie about something that didn’t happen.

Accuser passed a polygraph. An FBI polygraph.

Peter strozk’s FBI? Bob Mueller’s FBI? They have the credibility of Baghdad Bob...

Some of you traitors are really earning your new apartment in Moscow.

Name call all you want, and not to detract from the false accusation levied against nominee Kavanaugh, but the FBI is taking a justified beating over that hot mess.

I know this is screaming into the void but you have no idea that this accusation is false.

I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

Polygraph.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

Well sure. You want Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. You don't want to be the kind of person who supports a guy who would sexually assault a woman. Therefore, to avoid cognitive dissonance, it's imperative that she be lying. So your brain will find reasons to convince you that she's lying in order to avoid mental discomfort.

She doesn’t have any evidence to prove her version of events. Until proven otherwise her story is just that, a story.

Her husband’s corroboration and her therapist’s notes and the polygraph results are all evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

It may not have occurred. Hard to lie about something that didn’t happen.

Accuser passed a polygraph. An FBI polygraph.

Peter strozk’s FBI? Bob Mueller’s FBI? They have the credibility of Baghdad Bob...

Some of you traitors are really earning your new apartment in Moscow.

Name call all you want, and not to detract from the false accusation levied against nominee Kavanaugh, but the FBI is taking a justified beating over that hot mess.

I know this is screaming into the void but you have no idea that this accusation is false.

I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

Your personal level of surety really has no bearing here. What you just described is simply your uninformed opinion, which is contrary to volumes of research on this subject.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

Well sure. You want Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. You don't want to be the kind of person who supports a guy who would sexually assault a woman. Therefore, to avoid cognitive dissonance, it's imperative that she be lying. So your brain will find reasons to convince you that she's lying in order to avoid mental discomfort.

She doesn’t have any evidence to prove her version of events. Until proven otherwise her story is just that, a story.

“Christine Ford is a professor at Palo Alto University who teaches in a consortium with Stanford University, training graduate students in clinical psychology. Her work has been widely published in academic journals.” Yeah. I would totally trust someone who had $400K in debt magically disappear over this woman. Who passed a polygraph. Who spoke of this with her therapist in 2012. Whose therapist has the notes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

It may not have occurred. Hard to lie about something that didn’t happen.

Accuser passed a polygraph. An FBI polygraph.

Peter strozk’s FBI? Bob Mueller’s FBI? They have the credibility of Baghdad Bob...

Some of you traitors are really earning your new apartment in Moscow.

Name call all you want, and not to detract from the false accusation levied against nominee Kavanaugh, but the FBI is taking a justified beating over that hot mess.

I know this is screaming into the void but you have no idea that this accusation is false.

I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

She passed a polygraph and came forward BEFORE Kavanaugh had been selected.

None of what you said bears relevance on whether her story is true or not and he was already on the short list when she sent the letter.

He wasn't on the short list during her therapy sessions in 2012.

Are you saying her doctor faked notes from 6 years ago at the risk of losing her license?

Her doctors notes aren’t proof that the story is true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[
I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

Well sure. You want Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. You don't want to be the kind of person who supports a guy who would sexually assault a woman. Therefore, to avoid cognitive dissonance, it's imperative that she be lying. So your brain will find reasons to convince you that she's lying in order to avoid mental discomfort.

She doesn’t have any evidence to prove her version of events. Until proven otherwise her story is just that, a story.

Please look up the various definitions of evidence and then come back to make a meaningful contribution to this discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

It may not have occurred. Hard to lie about something that didn’t happen.

Accuser passed a polygraph. An FBI polygraph.

Peter strozk’s FBI? Bob Mueller’s FBI? They have the credibility of Baghdad Bob...

Some of you traitors are really earning your new apartment in Moscow.

Name call all you want, and not to detract from the false accusation levied against nominee Kavanaugh, but the FBI is taking a justified beating over that hot mess.

I know this is screaming into the void but you have no idea that this accusation is false.

I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

She passed a polygraph and came forward BEFORE Kavanaugh had been selected.

None of what you said bears relevance on whether her story is true or not and he was already on the short list when she sent the letter.

He wasn't on the short list during her therapy sessions in 2012.

Are you saying her doctor faked notes from 6 years ago at the risk of losing her license?

Her doctors notes aren’t proof that the story is true.

They heighten the credibility of the story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

It may not have occurred. Hard to lie about something that didn’t happen.

Accuser passed a polygraph. An FBI polygraph.

Peter strozk’s FBI? Bob Mueller’s FBI? They have the credibility of Baghdad Bob...

Some of you traitors are really earning your new apartment in Moscow.

Name call all you want, and not to detract from the false accusation levied against nominee Kavanaugh, but the FBI is taking a justified beating over that hot mess.

I know this is screaming into the void but you have no idea that this accusation is false.

I do. A 35 year old he said/she said allegation? One persons recollection of an event that may have occurred over 35 years ago and alcohol was involved and the other two people there don’t remember it that way? And there may have been a 4th person in the room (I’m not buying the therapist got it wrong angle). 99 percent sure this accusation is false. That’s enough for an Aye vote for Kavanaugh for me.

Your personal level of surety really has no bearing here. What you just described is simply your uninformed opinion, which is contrary to volumes of research on this subject.

Volumes of research on Kavanaughs accuser? Do tell.