No - it's absolutely not crazy. The reason that you think it's crazy is because dependence is the norm for American children, and your child is absolutely helpless because of your helicoptering. Yes, the circumstances that sometimes require the independence in these children abroad can be tragic. However, the actual independence itself is a very good thing. I was one of those very indepent 5 year olds; and I walked for miles on my own to explore. Many times with my even younger cousin. And no, we were not poor. To the contrary, I had a nanny and a housekeeper. I cherish all the good memories I have growing up. Likewise, my grandmother was a latchkey child, Polish and Italian immigrant background in New York. She took over cooking chores by the time she was 5 years old. Her sisters would tell me stories about how she would stand on a stool to cook dinner for the family. My godchild is a 7 year old girl growing up in Montreal. Mother is Swiss and the fater is Canadian. I spent a few afternoons on my last visit, and she delighted in showing me all around her neigborhood. She knew exactly how to get to school from home, how to get to the playground, how to get to the YMCA where she took swimming lessons, and how to get to both of her parents' work.. It's tragic that American children are incapable of such feats. |
There is a big difference between being able to find those things and being loose alone to do it. My kids knew the way at that age, too. They could give directions to another adult. That doesn't mean they drove it themselves! |
|
FWIW, plenty of American kids grew up spending days out playing alone. Some of the stories my mom told me were shocking--playing in abandoned mines, walking across railroad trestles, etc. That doesn't mean she was safe.
She also told me about a man asking her directions when she was twelve. He asked her to get in his car--she knew better. I suspect there used to be a lot more kids that disappeared, etc, back in the day before television and the internet. |
|
I used to travel unaccompanied every summer when I was a small child. One of my grandparents would come get me in the layover city. I started doing layovers at age 8. I would not let a 5 year old do a layover but I would let him do a direct flight. For a direct flight the parent can come to the gate (but check if that's still true) and make sure he boards the plane. At arrival the child stays in the seat until all of the passengers have unloaded. Usually I was brought into first class or an empty seat near the flight attendants right before descent. A flight attendant will help the child retrieve their luggage and meet their relative.
For a layover flight the child has to be handed off to a new crew member. I remember once I was told to sit down by the gate and then they forgot about me. I had to find someone to take me to my next flight. I would not trust a five year old to advocate for himself like that. |
| I think it is ridiculous to ask a flight attendant to be your kid's babysitter for 16hrs |
Most of us responding to this thread grew up in an era where kids had a lot more independence - while I agree it's troubling in some ways that kids don't get a chance to exercise their independence, it's not necessarily a good idea. I definitely got into some bad situations as a kid - including dealing with a flasher, someone trying to lure me into their car, getting hit on the head by an older kid, getting lost in the neighborhood and stuck outside in a thunderstorm-- so I don't want my kids to have that level of freedom. Also - like it or not, OP's kid is growing up in this country and will have the maturity level and independence of his peers - not of a kid working in a manufacturing plant in Bangladesh. So while theoretically a 5 year old may be able to handle it - I doubt a 5 year old who has grown up in this culture would be able to. |
|
It's one thing to put your child in the care of other people when you are in the same city--or even state. To put your child in the care of another--a stranger, no less-when he is on another continent-or two other continents--is a totally different story.
Sure you can do it. Everything will probably be fine. Just hope he doesn't get sick or have a careless caretaker. |
It depends of how mature your kid is, but he is very young, he would get tired and would be with a completely stranger that maybe not well trained in how to deal with a hungry/tired/scared/overstimulated kid. It won't be my first choice. Can't you find somebody flying there, maybe with help from your embassy/consulate |
|
I'm thinking that OP is relatively young (well, at least younger than 30) and that might explain some things...
When it comes to flying there are flights and there are flights: a 2 hour domestic flight definitely not the same as a almost day long flight that arrives in a different country (actually, in two different ones) where people speak a different language and you need to go though immigration/customs. That pretty much as bad as it gets imho. And yes, I also was thinking about "Home alone" when I was reading OP's responses. Also loved the story from a PP about her childhood flights from Italy and going with "her" Italian flight attendant to visit relatives at a layover - that sure would make for an entertaining Italian comedy - and Monica Belucci can play a flight attendant Thanks for sharing, PP.
|
| I will admit that I did not read all 15 pages of this thread, so my apologies if I am redundant. I have a 7 yr old and a 5 yr old, and am amazed at what a huge difference that two years of maturity makes. Honestly, I come across a ton of 5 yr olds and I don't think I have met a single one who I would feel comfortable sending on a trip like this. At 7, and with no connecting flights, I would send my kid on a trip alone. But not at 5, not on a trip overseas with a connection. |
It is actually a very entertaining read, I recommend it
Loved the Italian flight attendant story
And OP is an enigma wrapped in a mystery. |
What page is the Italian flight attendant story? |
Page 7, 12:15 post ("veteran of UM lounge") Also a story about a child who just "sat there" (the very last post on page 5) made me very sad for him. |
|
I think what the OP doesn't realize is that $75 fee doesn't cover a babysitter for the entire 16 hours of transit. It covers her passing the kid to a flight attendant, them getting him on the plane into his seat. Them (maybe) checking on his a little more frequently than the other passengers. But not a dedicated person to make sure the kid is okay. Just someone to kind of, sort of make sure the kid is relatively safe.
I couldn't imagine being next to a five year old unaccompanied minor on a very long flight. My heart would break for that kid. And what if the kid totally freaks out? They've have to land planes and de-board passengers for this. Way too many potential issues. It does seem like the OP has already convinced herself that we're just a bunch of crazy, overprotective Americans and the kid will be just fine. If that's the case, no amount of common sense will make a difference. That poor, poor kid. |
| I don't get those who are comparing this to what they did at 7 or 8. This child is five, and anyone who's had a child knows that there is a huge difference in maturity and decision-making ability between five and seven or eight. That is a difference of over 50% of the child's life. I'm a pretty free range parent, and I would consider putting a five-year old on a non-stop flight by themselves, if I had to. But a long international flight with a connection? No. |