How will republicans respond to this loss?

[Anonymous]

By moving to Canada.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/08/jeff-brucculeri-traffic-romney-supporters-canada_n_2094572.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false

[Anonymous]

Their tears and butt-hurt. It sustains me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Their tears and butt-hurt. It sustains me.

Can I Like this?

[Anonymous]

Maybe they will take Mitt Romney's advice and


self-deport.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Their tears and butt-hurt. It sustains me.

And you're gonna need it, the Dow has dropped over 300 points since the (re)election. A mere coincidence I'm sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their tears and butt-hurt. It sustains me.

And you're gonna need it, the Dow has dropped over 300 points since the (re)election. A mere coincidence I'm sure.

So the 4000+ gain of the last four years is also attributable to Obama?


Yeah, this is what's left of the R party, everybody. Behold and despair for your country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their tears and butt-hurt. It sustains me.

And you're gonna need it, the Dow has dropped over 300 points since the (re)election. A mere coincidence I'm sure.

So the 4000+ gain of the last four years is also attributable to Obama?


Yeah, this is what's left of the R party, everybody. Behold and despair for your country.

Losing 4000 points and recovering it is not a gain, it's breaking even.

And this is what the D party has become, celebrating 7.9 percent unemployment and mediocre (at best) economic growth.

[Anonymous]

Losing 4000 points and recovering it is not a gain, it's breaking even.

Remind me under whose administration left previous 4000 points were lost?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their tears and butt-hurt. It sustains me.

And you're gonna need it, the Dow has dropped over 300 points since the (re)election. A mere coincidence I'm sure.

So the 4000+ gain of the last four years is also attributable to Obama?


Yeah, this is what's left of the R party, everybody. Behold and despair for your country.

Losing 4000 points and recovering it is not a gain, it's breaking even.

And this is what the D party has become, celebrating 7.9 percent unemployment and mediocre (at best) economic growth.

Uh the thread is about stock market losses. I did not see any celebrating of unemployment.

And you do realize the 4000 point gain is the net improvement since jan 2009? It's not break even on Obama's watch. I'm nOt allowed to point out what happened prior to that because that would be "blaming" a certain someone and you wingnuts get all pissy about that.So all I can say is Obama came into office with the Dow at 8800. It's a heck of a lot higher now.

[Anonymous]

Here, here to PP's comment. Pro-Romney folks on DCUM cringe and complain when 43 is invoked but Tuesday exit polls show that voters still blame Bush II, not Obama, for our slow recovery.

[Anonymous]

Wow 300 points ...that like 2%. If the Dems had taken the House, it would be up 600 or 4%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here, here to PP's comment. Pro-Romney folks on DCUM cringe and complain when 43 is invoked but Tuesday exit polls show that voters still blame Bush II, not Obama, for our slow recovery.

THIS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Their tears and butt-hurt. It sustains me.

I think you are confusing us with Obamas ambassador.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Their tears and butt-hurt. It sustains me.

I think you are confusing us with Obamas ambassador.

Okay al-qaeda!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their tears and butt-hurt. It sustains me.

I think you are confusing us with Obamas ambassador.

PP, your misplaced, politicized rage-froth about the tragedy at Benghazi just highlights one of the many reasons why you, your party and your miserable robotic candidate FAILED.