Cut off nose to spite face? |
It's almost like you are in child of your own children. |
The fact that there is any significant number of parents (highly educated, UMC etc. etc. as is the demographic of this board) can take their children out to travel or whatever and still get their desired academic results suggests that missing those days is not a big deal. Now, is it just that the super smarties can miss due to their intelligence and involved parents and not missing more than a day or so in a year is only vital for the merely above average and below, or is "schooling" simply not what it used to be? As these parents continue to "poo-poo" rigorous school attendance, they may increasingly come to the conclusion that the "free public good" of this kind of school isn't actually up to par. Perhaps their children need an environment in which missing a chunk of days would have an impact. |
My kid isn’t missing anything from people like that “teacher” |
FCPS made it very clear they did not care about kids being in school during Covid. Other districts were open and operating. |
Very good point |
Could you be any more self important? Just bloviating. |
It is part of the health curriculum and in the pacing guide. You can opt out and there are other health lessons for those kids. Secondly, that is one thing. We are still teaching science, math and LA those days. My kids have a math test that Thursday. Kids who miss it will need to make it up when they return. I have a student starting their winter break next week and will miss the whole unit of instruction. I don’t have a problem with kids missing school. I do have a problem when parents ask for work and expect teachers to catch them up. |
So you’re mad if parents keep their kids on track, and mad if they don’t. Got it. Very flexible and sensible of you. |
There always will be subs. Teachers get sick, their kids get sick, and things happen. I guess the gist is, very few teachers in FCPS are taking off a full week to go travel. Very few will be taking the Thursday/Friday off to start their vacation early. Does that mean some are? Yes. But that needs to be approved by the principal. Many principals limit personal leave before a break. So unless you ask for data of personal leave vs sick leave, you won’t get much info. |
And for the kids to do it, it needs to be approved by their parents. There can’t be one set of expectations for teachers attendance vs students, it looks (and is) comically unserious, |
This is ludicrous. Yes there can be different expectations for kids who are LEARNING and need food, supervision, instruction, passing grades and test scores to attend school and a different one for the grown adults with multiple responsibilities who are at their job that has PTO like any other job. Yall have GOT to quit normalizing treating kids and adults as equals! |
|
Once more:
The PP said they were saving money by taking the kids out of school. So, they are valuing their $$$ over school attendance. The schools receive funds based on average daily attendance. When kids are out because it is cheaper for their parents to travel then, that means the schools get less money. No one begrudges a day or two here and there--but if your child is missing weeks of school for travel, you are the problem. |
Is “dependability” a value or not? Is being in school more important than family or budget or not? If it is, teachers shouldn’t be out. If it isn’t, schools shouldn’t be grouchy when kids are. |
Except for high achieving kids, you still haven’t articulated a problem. The problem is the schools get less money? FCPS fixes that next year by moving the planning days to the high-volume sub days of the day before Xmas break, spring break, and Thanksgiving break. Solved your worst attendance stats for you! |