The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

Agree Marla is aging best of the wives, perhaps because she spent the least time with him. But I think Melania was the prettiest if you consider how they looked when they met him. She really was very pretty—sad she ruined it with so much plastic surgery and filler. It’s making her age prematurely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

Agree Marla is aging best of the wives, perhaps because she spent the least time with him. But I think Melania was the prettiest if you consider how they looked when they met him. She really was very pretty—sad she ruined it with so much plastic surgery and filler. It’s making her age prematurely.

In that picture Marla looks like she is aging naturally, which is always the best choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

Agree Marla is aging best of the wives, perhaps because she spent the least time with him. But I think Melania was the prettiest if you consider how they looked when they met him. She really was very pretty—sad she ruined it with so much plastic surgery and filler. It’s making her age prematurely.

In that picture Marla looks like she is aging naturally, which is always the best choice.

Naturally means no fillers and surgery. She’s still probably coloring her hair, getting Botox, getting lasers/peels etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

Agree Marla is aging best of the wives, perhaps because she spent the least time with him. But I think Melania was the prettiest if you consider how they looked when they met him. She really was very pretty—sad she ruined it with so much plastic surgery and filler. It’s making her age prematurely.

What was she doing at the Grammy Awards!?!?

I love the color of her dress!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

Love the dress. What’s with the neck noose?

This article says the dress is outdated. I thought the dress looked good on her.

https://www.glam.com/1779059/marla-maples-outdated-outfit-2025-grammys/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

She looks great. I hadn’t seen a photo of her in ages, but looking at it, I can see that Tiffany inherited a lot of Marla’s features- yet, the addition of patneral genes makes Tiffany look very different than Marla.

The children of very attractive people are never quite as attractive (see: Cindy Crawford and daughter).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

Wow, she looks fabulous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

Agree Marla is aging best of the wives, perhaps because she spent the least time with him. But I think Melania was the prettiest if you consider how they looked when they met him. She really was very pretty—sad she ruined it with so much plastic surgery and filler. It’s making her age prematurely.

In that picture Marla looks like she is aging naturally, which is always the best choice.

Naturally means no fillers and surgery. She’s still probably coloring her hair, getting Botox, getting lasers/peels etc

I think definitely forehead Botox when she was younger and probably ongoing. I sort of regret not doing that when I was in my 40s as it does seem like that is one thing you can do without ruining your face. I also would not be surprised if she did some light surgical work to her chin area as she isn’t at all jowly or saggy there. Maybe it’s just genes but most women are starting to sag there by their 60s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

The article on this dress is hilarious, the whole website is fun:

For music's biggest night, Marla Maples decided that outdated was the theme. From the poorly tailored dress to the classic loose curls popularized at the beginning of the last decade, this red-carpet moment had so much room for improvement that we're wondering if a time machine was involved because this whole look is so 2010. We could almost see Taylor Swift wearing something like this during her "Speak Now" era.

But let's break it down piece by piece. The dress was constructed with a questionable fabric that's sprinkled with tiny specks that photographed poorly — so much so that we had the sudden urge to grab a lint roller and go to town. And if the material was a miss, the dress' fit wasn't doing any favors, either. As the photos from the evening show, the area around her waist could have done with a bit more cinching; with it going straight down, all of her shape was lost, and the dress' silhouette suffered. Unfortunately, Maples' side part, her curls, or even the gown itself aren't even the worst part. Maples went rogue and shattered the unspoken red-carpet rule of pairing a floor-length gown with black tights. Yes, black tights. We'll give you a moment to process this utter red-carpet fashion crime that, in retrospect, definitely made her one of the worst-dressed celebs at the 2025 Grammys.

Read More: https://www.glam.com/1779059/marla-maples-outdated-outfit-2025-grammys/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

The article on this dress is hilarious, the whole website is fun:

For music's biggest night, Marla Maples decided that outdated was the theme. From the poorly tailored dress to the classic loose curls popularized at the beginning of the last decade, this red-carpet moment had so much room for improvement that we're wondering if a time machine was involved because this whole look is so 2010. We could almost see Taylor Swift wearing something like this during her "Speak Now" era.

But let's break it down piece by piece. The dress was constructed with a questionable fabric that's sprinkled with tiny specks that photographed poorly — so much so that we had the sudden urge to grab a lint roller and go to town. And if the material was a miss, the dress' fit wasn't doing any favors, either. As the photos from the evening show, the area around her waist could have done with a bit more cinching; with it going straight down, all of her shape was lost, and the dress' silhouette suffered. Unfortunately, Maples' side part, her curls, or even the gown itself aren't even the worst part. Maples went rogue and shattered the unspoken red-carpet rule of pairing a floor-length gown with black tights. Yes, black tights. We'll give you a moment to process this utter red-carpet fashion crime that, in retrospect, definitely made her one of the worst-dressed celebs at the 2025 Grammys.

Read More: https://www.glam.com/1779059/marla-maples-outdated-outfit-2025-grammys/

Sounds like one of the usual DCUM self-anointed fashion critics - poor writing and all. I can only hope to look as good as Marla Maples when I'm 61.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

The article on this dress is hilarious, the whole website is fun:

For music's biggest night, Marla Maples decided that outdated was the theme. From the poorly tailored dress to the classic loose curls popularized at the beginning of the last decade, this red-carpet moment had so much room for improvement that we're wondering if a time machine was involved because this whole look is so 2010. We could almost see Taylor Swift wearing something like this during her "Speak Now" era.

But let's break it down piece by piece. The dress was constructed with a questionable fabric that's sprinkled with tiny specks that photographed poorly — so much so that we had the sudden urge to grab a lint roller and go to town. And if the material was a miss, the dress' fit wasn't doing any favors, either. As the photos from the evening show, the area around her waist could have done with a bit more cinching; with it going straight down, all of her shape was lost, and the dress' silhouette suffered. Unfortunately, Maples' side part, her curls, or even the gown itself aren't even the worst part. Maples went rogue and shattered the unspoken red-carpet rule of pairing a floor-length gown with black tights. Yes, black tights. We'll give you a moment to process this utter red-carpet fashion crime that, in retrospect, definitely made her one of the worst-dressed celebs at the 2025 Grammys.

Read More: https://www.glam.com/1779059/marla-maples-outdated-outfit-2025-grammys/

Sounds like one of the usual DCUM self-anointed fashion critics - poor writing and all. I can only hope to look as good as Marla Maples when I'm 61.

Pssst... no one is forcing you to be on this thread!

And the dress is ugly even though she looks damn good for 61.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

The article on this dress is hilarious, the whole website is fun:

For music's biggest night, Marla Maples decided that outdated was the theme. From the poorly tailored dress to the classic loose curls popularized at the beginning of the last decade, this red-carpet moment had so much room for improvement that we're wondering if a time machine was involved because this whole look is so 2010. We could almost see Taylor Swift wearing something like this during her "Speak Now" era.

But let's break it down piece by piece. The dress was constructed with a questionable fabric that's sprinkled with tiny specks that photographed poorly — so much so that we had the sudden urge to grab a lint roller and go to town. And if the material was a miss, the dress' fit wasn't doing any favors, either. As the photos from the evening show, the area around her waist could have done with a bit more cinching; with it going straight down, all of her shape was lost, and the dress' silhouette suffered. Unfortunately, Maples' side part, her curls, or even the gown itself aren't even the worst part. Maples went rogue and shattered the unspoken red-carpet rule of pairing a floor-length gown with black tights. Yes, black tights. We'll give you a moment to process this utter red-carpet fashion crime that, in retrospect, definitely made her one of the worst-dressed celebs at the 2025 Grammys.

Read More: https://www.glam.com/1779059/marla-maples-outdated-outfit-2025-grammys/

Sounds like one of the usual DCUM self-anointed fashion critics - poor writing and all. I can only hope to look as good as Marla Maples when I'm 61.

Pssst... no one is forcing you to be on this thread!

And the dress is ugly even though she looks damn good for 61.

I think the dres is nice and I don't think she has the $$$ that some of the other celebs do. I don't understand the article's point -- it is written as if there is a red carpet rule of wearing black tights. That can't possibly be right. I agree that black tights are really weird.

[Anonymous]

I also thought the fabric wasn't great, kind of cheap looking. But she wears purple well. Can't figure out what she has around her neck. Why would she not want to show her legs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We need some Kimberly - looks like she's lost some weight, toned down the makeup, and is on the prowl

The family values party has lost their script, is now apparently fundraising on OnlyFans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Marla does look good (she's 61) - here she is at the Grammys

She looks great. I hadn’t seen a photo of her in ages, but looking at it, I can see that Tiffany inherited a lot of Marla’s features- yet, the addition of patneral genes makes Tiffany look very different than Marla.

The children of very attractive people are never quite as attractive (see: Cindy Crawford and daughter).

Agreed. There is something off about Tiffany's look, and it is definitely from the Trump side. Though she is probably the best looking of the Trumps.