VRSC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top teams play NCSL in spring, the archives say these ‘top’ teams are just shïtty at best

Not exactly; there are a couple of teams that perform very well. One boys team is actually pretty good. Go take a look.

You are a truly amazing person to call kids teams shitty.

cawwww cawwwwww

Sooooooon nva and rev will be trading places like dan akroyd….


Caaaaw caaawwwww


Damn, that’s a low bar, no pun intended. When you brag about ncsl results and not even in first level/division of that league.

Maybe they are just trying to give some credit to kids' hard work. You don't even know which team they are talking about. It could be one of the EDP teams.

No matter what or how hard these teams play, those of you who are VRSC haters will NEVER give these kids a compliment or kudos.

Of course they won't. No matter what they claim no one with top team players at any club is actually sitting in here trolling endlessly. It's obvious some of them are literally staff from other clubs and the others, well, disgruntled parents from rival clubs who can't get their player bumped up due to other clubs while VRSC who's players moved over to their club a took the spots. Hell, I've listen to parents who bash VRSC but are actually offended by which team at VRSC they were placed on after tryouts thinking they would move over from lower tiered teams to top teams at VRSC. But no, VRSC is the problem and apparently lives so rent free in these trolls heads that they spend hours on here sh** posting. It's really pathetic and no one actually takes them seriously.

Just like your club.

Raventek is your club's only quantifiable positive at the moment. Sit with that and don't respond until something of value is on hand to discuss

What the hell is raventek?

its a bird coming to swoop in and pick up disgruntled players that will soon be open to playing with old comforting friends in 48hrs cawww cawwwww

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Niko must be fuming and showing his fists to the sky after the Loudoun/NVA news.

KARMA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:La Revolucion is over before it even started

Nah, it just shifted. One step closer to the original FCV all-girls model.

Suuuuuuuuuure, because apparently you can win without scoring goals????? 🤭

If you're right about NVA's prowess, those players will be scoring lots of goals for VRSC next season!

you mean "against VRSC" not "for VRSC"

We will know in a couple of weeks where those NVA players land.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s a Sad situation for VRSC boys. They have no pathway.

because nvas pathways were that successful? If rev is smart they focus on the girls and build them up to an ecnl contender. As it certainly sounds like GA made a choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Niko must be fuming and showing his fists to the sky after the Loudoun/NVA news.

KARMA

Indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:La Revolucion is over before it even started

Nah, it just shifted. One step closer to the original FCV all-girls model.

Suuuuuuuuuure, because apparently you can win without scoring goals????? 🤭

If you're right about NVA's prowess, those players will be scoring lots of goals for VRSC next season!

you mean "against VRSC" not "for VRSC"

no the girls literally arr tapping on their phones with their schoolmates discussing getting old teams back together AT revolution. They are smart enough to choose social connections over false promises. Don’t think revolution will have issues attracting girls. It’s retaining the boys that might be the issue. But most of the parents are ex loudoun parents who cant wait to throw egg in the faces of NVA families that argued the virtues of NVA. Those parents have no interest in going back.


I told you so’s and open arms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s a Sad situation for VRSC boys. They have no pathway.

because nvas pathways were that successful? If rev is smart they focus on the girls and build them up to an ecnl contender. As it certainly sounds like GA made a choice.

Fall 2026 VRSC goes ECNL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s a Sad situation for VRSC boys. They have no pathway.

because nvas pathways were that successful? If rev is smart they focus on the girls and build them up to an ecnl contender. As it certainly sounds like GA made a choice.

Fall 2026 VRSC goes ECNL

that would be amazing… the facilities would help but the recruitment would be difficult early on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:La Revolucion is over before it even started

Nah, it just shifted. One step closer to the original FCV all-girls model.

Suuuuuuuuuure, because apparently you can win without scoring goals????? 🤭

If you're right about NVA's prowess, those players will be scoring lots of goals for VRSC next season!

you mean "against VRSC" not "for VRSC"

Adam you're drunk please go to bed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s a Sad situation for VRSC boys. They have no pathway.

because nvas pathways were that successful? If rev is smart they focus on the girls and build them up to an ecnl contender. As it certainly sounds like GA made a choice.

Fall 2026 VRSC goes ECNL

😂 cmon now put some respect on ECNL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s a Sad situation for VRSC boys. They have no pathway.

because nvas pathways were that successful? If rev is smart they focus on the girls and build them up to an ecnl contender. As it certainly sounds like GA made a choice.

Fall 2026 VRSC goes ECNL

😂 cmon now put some respect on ECNL

screaming i needed that lmao

[Anonymous]

It was said that Revolution and/or TSJ will be demoted to Aspire.

[Anonymous]

How did VRSC GA teams do?

[Anonymous]

no the girls literally arr tapping on their phones with their schoolmates discussing getting old teams back together AT revolution. They are smart enough to choose social connections over false promises. Don’t think revolution will have issues attracting girls. It’s retaining the boys that might be the issue. But most of the parents are ex loudoun parents who cant wait to throw egg in the faces of NVA families that argued the virtues of NVA. Those parents have no interest in going back.


I told you so’s and open arms.


Only a 11s/12s/13s parent would think this way. This isn't about social connection, at this level, for older ages. There won't be "old" teams (assuming you mean FCV) getting back together at REV at any of the older age groups. Or maybe you are saying old loudoun teammates from some time before NVA... Maybe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was said that Revolution and/or TSJ will be demoted to Aspire.

Where was this stated?