Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Trump is quoted as saying Epstein’s a great guy and likes beautiful women as much as he does, some on the younger side.

Of all the ridiculous talking points - acting like there was no relationship between Epstein and Trump is ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only part of the affidavit that is relevant to the fbi search is the statements related to why the fbi couldn’t get the documents via other means. So it should contain numbered paragraphs of the dates and times when the DOJ connected with Trump lawyers (or attempted to) and tried again and again and couldn’t reach agreement. That type of back and forth is what people are wanting to see. If doj did that and couldn’t get the documents, the I think a lot of people would say “well trump deserved it.” But no. FBI doesn’t have the benefit of the doubt with trump after the Russian collusion issue or frankly after it treated Hillary Clinton. So here, showing that kind of detail in the affidavit would support garland’s statement that they couldn’t get the information by any other means. And it would show that trump teams statements that after the initial interactions in early June they heard nothing else until the search last week. Revealing that back and forth doesn’t reveal detail about exactly what they are investigating or any secrets sources and methods. But it would answer the questions we don’t know. Did trump refuse to cooperate thus prompting the raid or did DOJ jump the gun.

Weird, I thought the FBI thoroughly investigated Hilary about Benghazi! And emails.
Russian collusion, I thought a bunch of people connected to Trump went to jail? And just because they couldn’t pin it on Trump didn’t Mueller say “I’m not exonerating him either.”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only part of the affidavit that is relevant to the fbi search is the statements related to why the fbi couldn’t get the documents via other means. So it should contain numbered paragraphs of the dates and times when the DOJ connected with Trump lawyers (or attempted to) and tried again and again and couldn’t reach agreement. That type of back and forth is what people are wanting to see. If doj did that and couldn’t get the documents, the I think a lot of people would say “well trump deserved it.” But no. FBI doesn’t have the benefit of the doubt with trump after the Russian collusion issue or frankly after it treated Hillary Clinton. So here, showing that kind of detail in the affidavit would support garland’s statement that they couldn’t get the information by any other means. And it would show that trump teams statements that after the initial interactions in early June they heard nothing else until the search last week. Revealing that back and forth doesn’t reveal detail about exactly what they are investigating or any secrets sources and methods. But it would answer the questions we don’t know. Did trump refuse to cooperate thus prompting the raid or did DOJ jump the gun.

Weird, I thought the FBI thoroughly investigated Hilary about Benghazi! And emails.
Russian collusion, I thought a bunch of people connected to Trump went to jail? And just because they couldn’t pin it on Trump didn’t Mueller say “I’m not exonerating him either.”?

You’re correct but the conservatives live in the upside down where they are constantly lied to by trump and trump media types like Alex Jones. They have a QAnon approved version of what happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only part of the affidavit that is relevant to the fbi search is the statements related to why the fbi couldn’t get the documents via other means. So it should contain numbered paragraphs of the dates and times when the DOJ connected with Trump lawyers (or attempted to) and tried again and again and couldn’t reach agreement. That type of back and forth is what people are wanting to see. If doj did that and couldn’t get the documents, the I think a lot of people would say “well trump deserved it.” But no. FBI doesn’t have the benefit of the doubt with trump after the Russian collusion issue or frankly after it treated Hillary Clinton. So here, showing that kind of detail in the affidavit would support garland’s statement that they couldn’t get the information by any other means. And it would show that trump teams statements that after the initial interactions in early June they heard nothing else until the search last week. Revealing that back and forth doesn’t reveal detail about exactly what they are investigating or any secrets sources and methods. But it would answer the questions we don’t know. Did trump refuse to cooperate thus prompting the raid or did DOJ jump the gun.

Weird, I thought the FBI thoroughly investigated Hilary about Benghazi! And emails.
Russian collusion, I thought a bunch of people connected to Trump went to jail? And just because they couldn’t pin it on Trump didn’t Mueller say “I’m not exonerating him either.”?

And Mueller was held back from digging into the most fertile grounds of potential Russia influence: His banking with Russia, his Russia business deals, Deripaska, Trump Tower Moscow, Felix Sater, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is above the law! Well, except illegal border crossers, Epstein's clients, the Prez's kid...

This is the problem with Trumpsters: they lack critical thinking skills.

1. illegal immigration is a misdemeanor
2. The Prez's kids aren't POTUS, even so, if they break the law, they should get punished for it. Trump's whole family violated ethics regulations, but that's not a big deal, though right?
3. No one thinks Epstein or his "friends" should not be prosecuted

Even so, none of the above is as big of a deal as the Espionage Act.

And another thing: you would think that someone who is obssessive about NDAs and people close to him not disclosing his secrets would be more circumspect with our country's secrets. You would think someone who values loyalty would be loyal to the US rather than his own ego or Putin.

But, I forgot.. we are talking about an egolomaniac and a moron (deadly combo) so, of course, only he deserves absolutely loyalty.

not quite true. alex azar thought epstein shouldn’t be prosecuted. you remember, tfg’s labor secretary if i’m remembering his cabinet seat right.

Alex Azar was Health and Human Services. Alex Acosta was nominated for Labor, but withdrawn because of Epstein connection.

sorry, you're right - I got the Trump-tainted AAs mixed up!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Oh hey look, an expert in ignoring evidence and never investigating anything.

[Anonymous]

Russian state media says they are unhappy "their agent" in the US is being persecuted by the FBI.
https://www.ibtimes.com/russian-state-media-calls-trump-our-agent-believes-mar-lago-raid-persecution-3602609

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Russian state media says they are unhappy "their agent" in the US is being persecuted by the FBI.
https://www.ibtimes.com/russian-state-media-calls-trump-our-agent-believes-mar-lago-raid-persecution-3602609

Russian state media doesn't "accidentally" say things so WTH?
Are they just trying to stir the pot?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Oh hey look, an expert in ignoring evidence and never investigating anything.

I would never want Jim Jordan to defend me. That seems like the lowest of lows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only part of the affidavit that is relevant to the fbi search is the statements related to why the fbi couldn’t get the documents via other means. So it should contain numbered paragraphs of the dates and times when the DOJ connected with Trump lawyers (or attempted to) and tried again and again and couldn’t reach agreement. That type of back and forth is what people are wanting to see. If doj did that and couldn’t get the documents, the I think a lot of people would say “well trump deserved it.” But no. FBI doesn’t have the benefit of the doubt with trump after the Russian collusion issue or frankly after it treated Hillary Clinton. So here, showing that kind of detail in the affidavit would support garland’s statement that they couldn’t get the information by any other means. And it would show that trump teams statements that after the initial interactions in early June they heard nothing else until the search last week. Revealing that back and forth doesn’t reveal detail about exactly what they are investigating or any secrets sources and methods. But it would answer the questions we don’t know. Did trump refuse to cooperate thus prompting the raid or did DOJ jump the gun.

Weird, I thought the FBI thoroughly investigated Hilary about Benghazi! And emails.
Russian collusion, I thought a bunch of people connected to Trump went to jail? And just because they couldn’t pin it on Trump didn’t Mueller say “I’m not exonerating him either.”?

You’ve managed to avoid the entire point of what I am saying. The affidavit could be redacted of sensitive information but also leave behind information that would support or refute Garland’s statement that the DOJ couldn’t get the documents any other way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only part of the affidavit that is relevant to the fbi search is the statements related to why the fbi couldn’t get the documents via other means. So it should contain numbered paragraphs of the dates and times when the DOJ connected with Trump lawyers (or attempted to) and tried again and again and couldn’t reach agreement. That type of back and forth is what people are wanting to see. If doj did that and couldn’t get the documents, the I think a lot of people would say “well trump deserved it.” But no. FBI doesn’t have the benefit of the doubt with trump after the Russian collusion issue or frankly after it treated Hillary Clinton. So here, showing that kind of detail in the affidavit would support garland’s statement that they couldn’t get the information by any other means. And it would show that trump teams statements that after the initial interactions in early June they heard nothing else until the search last week. Revealing that back and forth doesn’t reveal detail about exactly what they are investigating or any secrets sources and methods. But it would answer the questions we don’t know. Did trump refuse to cooperate thus prompting the raid or did DOJ jump the gun.

Weird, I thought the FBI thoroughly investigated Hilary about Benghazi! And emails.
Russian collusion, I thought a bunch of people connected to Trump went to jail? And just because they couldn’t pin it on Trump didn’t Mueller say “I’m not exonerating him either.”?

You’ve managed to avoid the entire point of what I am saying. The affidavit could be redacted of sensitive information but also leave behind information that would support or refute Garland’s statement that the DOJ couldn’t get the documents any other way.

Why should Trump be accommodated anymore than he has already been? His lawyers signed an affidavit saying that they don't have any more documents, when they actually did. Why should the DOJ beg and plead and negotiate any more than they already have, when the man is clearly in possession of material he should not have?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only part of the affidavit that is relevant to the fbi search is the statements related to why the fbi couldn’t get the documents via other means. So it should contain numbered paragraphs of the dates and times when the DOJ connected with Trump lawyers (or attempted to) and tried again and again and couldn’t reach agreement. That type of back and forth is what people are wanting to see. If doj did that and couldn’t get the documents, the I think a lot of people would say “well trump deserved it.” But no. FBI doesn’t have the benefit of the doubt with trump after the Russian collusion issue or frankly after it treated Hillary Clinton. So here, showing that kind of detail in the affidavit would support garland’s statement that they couldn’t get the information by any other means. And it would show that trump teams statements that after the initial interactions in early June they heard nothing else until the search last week. Revealing that back and forth doesn’t reveal detail about exactly what they are investigating or any secrets sources and methods. But it would answer the questions we don’t know. Did trump refuse to cooperate thus prompting the raid or did DOJ jump the gun.

Weird, I thought the FBI thoroughly investigated Hilary about Benghazi! And emails.
Russian collusion, I thought a bunch of people connected to Trump went to jail? And just because they couldn’t pin it on Trump didn’t Mueller say “I’m not exonerating him either.”?

You’ve managed to avoid the entire point of what I am saying. The affidavit could be redacted of sensitive information but also leave behind information that would support or refute Garland’s statement that the DOJ couldn’t get the documents any other way.

What part of “national security” risk do you not understand? The information seized should not have been there. Period. Period period. The warrant would be justified whether or not they asked for it nicely first.

He’s lucky he’s not already in prison.

[Anonymous]

It is now 9 days from the search and Trump still has not explained to the American people why he was in possession of sensitive national security secrets. What is Trump hiding? Why won't he come clean?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only part of the affidavit that is relevant to the fbi search is the statements related to why the fbi couldn’t get the documents via other means. So it should contain numbered paragraphs of the dates and times when the DOJ connected with Trump lawyers (or attempted to) and tried again and again and couldn’t reach agreement. That type of back and forth is what people are wanting to see. If doj did that and couldn’t get the documents, the I think a lot of people would say “well trump deserved it.” But no. FBI doesn’t have the benefit of the doubt with trump after the Russian collusion issue or frankly after it treated Hillary Clinton. So here, showing that kind of detail in the affidavit would support garland’s statement that they couldn’t get the information by any other means. And it would show that trump teams statements that after the initial interactions in early June they heard nothing else until the search last week. Revealing that back and forth doesn’t reveal detail about exactly what they are investigating or any secrets sources and methods. But it would answer the questions we don’t know. Did trump refuse to cooperate thus prompting the raid or did DOJ jump the gun.

Weird, I thought the FBI thoroughly investigated Hilary about Benghazi! And emails.
Russian collusion, I thought a bunch of people connected to Trump went to jail? And just because they couldn’t pin it on Trump didn’t Mueller say “I’m not exonerating him either.”?

You’ve managed to avoid the entire point of what I am saying. The affidavit could be redacted of sensitive information but also leave behind information that would support or refute Garland’s statement that the DOJ couldn’t get the documents any other way.

Why should Trump be accommodated anymore than he has already been? His lawyers signed an affidavit saying that they don't have any more documents, when they actually did. Why should the DOJ beg and plead and negotiate any more than they already have, when the man is clearly in possession of material he should not have?

+1 When anyone else would have had their door busted open on January 22?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is now 9 days from the search and Trump still has not explained to the American people why he was in possession of sensitive national security secrets. What is Trump hiding? Why won't he come clean?

I for one look forward to his sworn testimony in front of a judge. No more games. Get him boys.