Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder how young these poor victims are. Forced birthers don’t care who gets hurt in their crossfire; they just want to wound the maximum number women.

[Anonymous]

Check out these totally unanticipated (rolls eyes) consequences coming out of Ohio:

https://www.rawstory.com/amp/forced-to-leave-ohio-2658323769

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Check out these totally unanticipated (rolls eyes) consequences coming out of Ohio:

https://www.rawstory.com/amp/forced-to-leave-ohio-2658323769

It's unsurprising. The right wingers just want to breed low cost workers and don't care how many girls lives they have to ruin. I guess they consider it the 10 or 11 year olds "fault" for being raped. The lives of the girl and the baby are both mostly ruined before they have barely begun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Also, these cases, proving yet again how sadistic anti-abortion extremists are.

Another three examples were of women whose fetuses had severe abnormalities or other conditions that made a successful pregnancy impossible. Even so, they couldn’t get abortions in Ohio.

And in three cases, debilitating vomiting was caused by pregnancy — so bad in one case that a woman couldn’t get off the clinic floor. But neither could these women get abortions in Ohio, the affidavits said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

And more sadism on the part of anti-abortion extremists:

In the days after S.B. 23 took effect, a pregnant 25-year-old went to a clinic operated by Planned Parenthood of Southwest Ohio, said Liner, the medical director there. The patient had recurrent cancer and was undergoing chemotherapy when she learned that she was pregnant.

Chemotherapy is dangerous during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy and this patient had already skipped one treatment. But when the clinic determined that she was eight weeks pregnant, workers there said they couldn’t perform an abortion, Liner said.

“Due to the patient having cancer while pregnant, we sought documentation to support a medical exception to S.B. 23 for this patient,” Liner said in her affidavit. “Her provider of care did not feel comfortable providing this and the patient had to travel out of state for an abortion to resume her cancer treatment, which caused further delay.”

The effect of delaying chemotherapy on the patient’s health might be hard to determine, but it seems unlikely that it was good.

Just three days after S.B. 23 took effect, a 37-year-old suffering stage III melanoma went to Women’s Med Center in Dayton, Trick, the operations manager there, said. The woman was told by her doctors that she had to terminate her pregnancy before they could treat her, so she, too, would have to leave the state, Trick said.

“Upon learning that she would need to travel out of state to have her abortion, the patient broke down and cried inconsolably despite the attempts of multiple staff members, including myself, to console her,” Trick said in her sworn affidavit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Even more distressing cases. Disgusting. You anti-abortionists, all this pain and suffering is on you.

In addition to those cases, women with conditions that made successful pregnancies impossible had problems getting doctors outside the clinics to treat them, David Burkons, medical director of Northeast Ohio Women’s Center said. Two patients at the clinic said they had tubal, or “ectopic,” pregnancies “but the doctors (at emergency rooms) were afraid to treat them without being absolutely certain there was no intrauterine pregnancy,” Burkons wrote in his affidavit.

“In one case, the patient’s fallopian tube ruptured, and surgery (was needed) rather than medical management, which would have been possible if they had acted sooner,” he said. “In the other, my nurse intervened to convince a physician to treat the patient, but only several days later, which was emotionally wrenching for the patient.”

The affidavits also detail cases of fetal abnormalities and other problems so severe that pregnancies can’t result in a successful birth. One patient at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Southwest Ohio had a fetus with abnormalities including “a lack of lower extremities and the contents of the fetus’s abdomen, including possibly the heart, protruding through a defect in the abdominal wall,” Liner, a doctor, said in her sworn statement.

[Anonymous]

Oh and what a surprise. The law in Ohio is making some women rush to get abortions before they've decided they really and truly want one, because they don't have the luxury of time to decide. Well done, anti-abortionists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Even more distressing cases. Disgusting. You anti-abortionists, all this pain and suffering is on you.

In addition to those cases, women with conditions that made successful pregnancies impossible had problems getting doctors outside the clinics to treat them, David Burkons, medical director of Northeast Ohio Women’s Center said. Two patients at the clinic said they had tubal, or “ectopic,” pregnancies “but the doctors (at emergency rooms) were afraid to treat them without being absolutely certain there was no intrauterine pregnancy,” Burkons wrote in his affidavit.

“In one case, the patient’s fallopian tube ruptured, and surgery (was needed) rather than medical management, which would have been possible if they had acted sooner,” he said. “In the other, my nurse intervened to convince a physician to treat the patient, but only several days later, which was emotionally wrenching for the patient.”

The affidavits also detail cases of fetal abnormalities and other problems so severe that pregnancies can’t result in a successful birth. One patient at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Southwest Ohio had a fetus with abnormalities including “a lack of lower extremities and the contents of the fetus’s abdomen, including possibly the heart, protruding through a defect in the abdominal wall,” Liner, a doctor, said in her sworn statement.

They’re pretending they didn’t have anything to do with this.

[Anonymous]

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/23/biden-promises-to-codify-roe-if-two-more-democrats-are-elected-to-the-senate.html

With 46 days to go until November’s Election Day, Biden urged supporters at a Democratic National Committee event to consider “what’s on the ballot,” listing issues including abortion.
“If you give me two more senators in the United States Senate, I promise you, I promise you, we’re going to codify Roe and once again make Roe the law of the land,” Biden said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/23/biden-promises-to-codify-roe-if-two-more-democrats-are-elected-to-the-senate.html

With 46 days to go until November’s Election Day, Biden urged supporters at a Democratic National Committee event to consider “what’s on the ballot,” listing issues including abortion.
“If you give me two more senators in the United States Senate, I promise you, I promise you, we’re going to codify Roe and once again make Roe the law of the land,” Biden said.

And states rights republicans will sue and win at SCOTUS. Rings hollow for me, I want to hear him say they’re going to expand the court. But I’ll take this. Voting this weekend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/23/biden-promises-to-codify-roe-if-two-more-democrats-are-elected-to-the-senate.html

With 46 days to go until November’s Election Day, Biden urged supporters at a Democratic National Committee event to consider “what’s on the ballot,” listing issues including abortion.
“If you give me two more senators in the United States Senate, I promise you, I promise you, we’re going to codify Roe and once again make Roe the law of the land,” Biden said.

And states rights republicans will sue and win at SCOTUS. Rings hollow for me, I want to hear him say they’re going to expand the court. But I’ll take this. Voting this weekend.

I do wonder though with Graham stating he wants to codify a national ban whether SC would rule in the same manner if pro-choice advocates sued.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/23/biden-promises-to-codify-roe-if-two-more-democrats-are-elected-to-the-senate.html

With 46 days to go until November’s Election Day, Biden urged supporters at a Democratic National Committee event to consider “what’s on the ballot,” listing issues including abortion.
“If you give me two more senators in the United States Senate, I promise you, I promise you, we’re going to codify Roe and once again make Roe the law of the land,” Biden said.

And states rights republicans will sue and win at SCOTUS. Rings hollow for me, I want to hear him say they’re going to expand the court. But I’ll take this. Voting this weekend.

I do wonder though with Graham stating he wants to codify a national ban whether SC would rule in the same manner if pro-choice advocates sued.

Of course they wouldn't. It's not about states' rights, it's about controlling women. It's not about consistency, it's about cruelty. It's not about life, it's about forcing women to do a particular thing that's financially burdensome and risky to their health to keep them in and oppressed underclass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/23/biden-promises-to-codify-roe-if-two-more-democrats-are-elected-to-the-senate.html

With 46 days to go until November’s Election Day, Biden urged supporters at a Democratic National Committee event to consider “what’s on the ballot,” listing issues including abortion.
“If you give me two more senators in the United States Senate, I promise you, I promise you, we’re going to codify Roe and once again make Roe the law of the land,” Biden said.

And states rights republicans will sue and win at SCOTUS. Rings hollow for me, I want to hear him say they’re going to expand the court. But I’ll take this. Voting this weekend.

At this point I think they want to encourage the Democratic voters and not give the forced birther lunatics a boost at the polls. Promising to enlarge the court would get them out to vote.

[Anonymous]

Women need to get out and vote this fall, or we are looy at essentially a nationwide ban on certain forms of women's healthcare if the GOP wins.

Conservatives have made it clear it's not just about "states rights" to make little girls have rape babies and make grown women choose whether they want to give birth under trying circumstances or just give up on having children. They are horrible choices and the GOP wants to do that to all of us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/23/biden-promises-to-codify-roe-if-two-more-democrats-are-elected-to-the-senate.html

With 46 days to go until November’s Election Day, Biden urged supporters at a Democratic National Committee event to consider “what’s on the ballot,” listing issues including abortion.
“If you give me two more senators in the United States Senate, I promise you, I promise you, we’re going to codify Roe and once again make Roe the law of the land,” Biden said.

And states rights republicans will sue and win at SCOTUS. Rings hollow for me, I want to hear him say they’re going to expand the court. But I’ll take this. Voting this weekend.

At this point I think they want to encourage the Democratic voters and not give the forced birther lunatics a boost at the polls. Promising to enlarge the court would get them out to vote.

You are probably right, not many in my camp are NOT going to vote just because they aren’t talking about expanding the court.