In fact you will never please this kind of parent. No DL for PK so they demanded it and got. Now they have DL for PK and they hate it and want in-person. They might get in-person, but it won't be enough. When they get full-time in-person, they will then complain the teacher isn't meeting the needs of their child genius and isn't differentiating. Notice a pattern? Please remember that PK is optional. OPTIONAL means your child does not need to be there and nor do. |
That should NOT be happening. DCPS has been explicit this fall about using Teams. No one is supposed to be using zoom. I know you won’t say what school but that principal is leaving his/her staff out to dry if something happens. DCPS will not support schools that go against the rule to use Teams. |
| All the parents complaining about not starting content....you should attend Stanton! They started content day two. No wasted time on how to use the technology or reviewing. Check twitter out. They were working hard all week. |
Agree your principal isn’t doing you any favors. Signed, a teacher whose principal has been strict about Teams from the jump. |
Our entire Capitol Hill DCPS is on zoom for the first two weeks, because they accurately predicted that all of the bugs/changes getting Teams up would make it worth avoid for the first two weeks. Our neighbors are at a different CH DCPS and also using zoom, so I think your admin might be unusual in not allowing any leeway. |
PP you’re responding to. DD’s class is on Zoom. You contempt for parents is evident in your post. Did you really think that all of these parents didn’t know the difference between zoom and teams? Give me a break. I’d actually be totally fine with games and am fine with the SEL/get to know classmates aspects. But they are teaching actual content too and that content is way too easy. They’re not learning Teams or Canvas yet and they haven’t submitted assignments, so that’s not the issue. Teacher is doing actual mini lessons and the content is way too easy. Getting taught letter sounds when you can read isn’t engaging. You *must* engage kids on DL from the get go or you will lose them. I genuinely think the class is too easy for at least 90% of the class. It is also identical in some respects to my PK3 DS’ content. |
all the hostility is unfortunate, but agree with this parent -- the kids need to be learning. My kid did virtual summer classes and camps (one through DCPS) this summer and they were engaging and challenging from day 1, and that is why he loved it. I'm really surprised by what is going on in his 1st grade, it is so easy that it is actually depressing the kids. Please expect more of them -- they will love it. my kid who loves school, and you are losing him. -- a DCPS parent, also a former teacher |
|
I agree that starting the year with SEL is ideal *in normal circumstances.*
But it doesn’t work well online, which add to the kids’ frustrations. If I head one more discussion asking for kids thoughts on how to manage change and deal with frustration — or worse, where to click — I will scream. The best way to help kids’ deal with hard, pandemic times is to not make it worse by dragging out slow-moving online conversations! My kids did a virtual camp this summer that they loved because it was interesting content. In a virtual world, they need some substance to keep them engaged. |
Your school and the other CH school are flagrantly violating DCPS policy. Your school, by not following this policy is probably also violating FERPA since your leadership gets to make up polices at will. |
What in the hell are you talking about? |
The breakout room feature should help once it’s actually up and running. Right now I have the feature but there are lots of bugs to be worked out. I won’t be using it until it is officially unveiled in October. |
Amidon Bowen is all zoom. It’s going to suck when they have to switch over. The principal really set up those teachers to fail |
|
An observation about this thread and others on DCUM. It is really interesting to watch parents both complain about wasted time in the early week(s) and also about how poor the technology deployment and teacher performance is in the early week(s). Similarly, it is interesting to watch parents complain about how much technological intervention is required on their part at the same time they complain that everything in week one was way behind grade level and too focused on technology.
Is it possible that the abundance of caution that has schools doing technology intros is intended to close the technology knowledge gap so that all kids are on an even footing once rigorous work begins in week 2 or 3? And further that by trying to create a baseline of technology skills and knowledge, the goal is to minimize wasted time and resources spent by teachers in helping kids log in, find work, use available technology in Week 3 and beyond? Is it possible that some of the teachers may be new to this and/or uncomfortable with the technology and they themselves have a steep learning curve? Maybe it is unnecessary and overkill. Maybe one week is enough but two is too many? Maybe your kid is comfortable but 50% of the class isn't so these early weeks are important to their learning and ability to remain engaged going forward. Maybe it is all a waste and your kid will be shortchanged two whole weeks of school. Maybe your kid's teacher is fluent in Teams and spent time and energy to get comfortable and maximize their teaching methods more so than entrenched tenured WTU dinosaurs who couldn't be bothered to lift a finger until the day and hour that the contract started. But can you get outside yourself and your experience for just a moment to consider the experience or background of others such that maybe, just maybe, there are benefits to others that you won't realize, and the aggregate cost to your "wasted" two weeks is significantly less than the cost of losing kids who just quit (emotionally, academically, or actually physically quitting) because the hurdle of on-line learning is too much to overcome without someone giving them the tools that your kids already possess, or because their teacher needed a week or two to figure out how to make this all useful? |
OP asked how it was going. Not everyone wants sugarcoating for something that clearly sucks. This will be a gap year for too many students. |
My version of Teams already has breakout rooms but we aren’t supposed to use them unless we have an adult to supervise each group. |