Mueller Report is being delivered to Barr today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can any of his many followers here explain Seth Abramson's latest tweet storm? Seeing as how he was basically the most lurid conspiracy-monger, I went looking for what he had to say and it's even harder to make sense of than usual.

If you are talking about this thread: https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1109212296591613952 then he is basically saying the same thing as Neal Katyal; that this "report" is bot the end, but rather the beginning of a world of investigation and truth-seeking that no other President has endured. He is basically saying that between SDNY, EDVA, Main DOJ and the House, there will be a roadmap as it is too much for a 10 or 17 person SCO staff to handle.

Remember, Flynn, Gates and Butina are still cooperating witnesses. That along should give people pause as to what is coming.

“Seth are any of these possible?

(1) Barr shut it down prematurely while pretending he didn't?

(2) Mueller is compromised? (long shot, admittedly)

(3) Today is an elaborate ruse b/c of the incredibly high stakes -- they want to appear to zig when they are really going to zag?”

From the twitter thread.

Loon fest 2019.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trumpsters ought not to be so cocky since the report has not been released.

Trumpsters also ought not forget SDNY.

Trumpsters also may want to read up on RICO.

I really pray this post ages VERY, VERY well!

In other words: “double or nothing!”

The SDNY who was played by Veselnitskya when they said they'd pay for her hotel room after the Perevon trial and she went to a $1000 a night hotel room after the fine on her company she repped was a tap on the wrist? That SDNY? The SDNY who worked out the dets of her visa to represent her company and the FBI lost track of her so she went from city to city to commit these acts to sabotage the Democrat candidate?

This makes no sense to me and now some are going to dig in their heels and ignore the real villians and the true victims. But hey, you do you.

[Anonymous]

The fact that Trump, or nobody in his family, will be indicted really throws a wrench into the Democrats' 2020 campaign platform.

Maybe they will have to come up with some actual policy positions to run on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can any of his many followers here explain Seth Abramson's latest tweet storm? Seeing as how he was basically the most lurid conspiracy-monger, I went looking for what he had to say and it's even harder to make sense of than usual.

If you are talking about this thread: https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1109212296591613952 then he is basically saying the same thing as Neal Katyal; that this "report" is bot the end, but rather the beginning of a world of investigation and truth-seeking that no other President has endured. He is basically saying that between SDNY, EDVA, Main DOJ and the House, there will be a roadmap as it is too much for a 10 or 17 person SCO staff to handle.

Remember, Flynn, Gates and Butina are still cooperating witnesses. That along should give people pause as to what is coming.

“Seth are any of these possible?

(1) Barr shut it down prematurely while pretending he didn't?

(2) Mueller is compromised? (long shot, admittedly)

(3) Today is an elaborate ruse b/c of the incredibly high stakes -- they want to appear to zig when they are really going to zag?”

From the twitter thread.

Loon fest 2019.

Anything is possible. Loon Fest 2019 is probable. I've even read a conspiracy theory this report was out there for any GOP presidential candidate's name to be inserted into. I must say, I do love a big budget flick with plot twists but this one might get a high rotten tomato score and others may tamper with those results. This flick is an embarassment to our amazing country and we need to come together.

Facts Matter.

[Anonymous]

After calling the investigation a witch hunt for months, Trump hasn’t tweeted in 15 hours. He’s said nothing about it.

That tells me everything I need to know.

[Anonymous]

Republicans slogan in 2020: slime is not crime

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:After calling the investigation a witch hunt for months, Trump hasn’t tweeted in 15 hours. He’s said nothing about it.

That tells me everything I need to know.

I think someone took his phone when they heard the report was coming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Trump, or nobody in his family, will be indicted really throws a wrench into the Democrats' 2020 campaign platform.

Maybe they will have to come up with some actual policy positions to run on.

They should, but they are incapable.

[Anonymous]

Ben wittes preliminary thoughts
https://www.lawfareblog.com/very-quick-thoughts-end-mueller-investigation

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ben wittes preliminary thoughts
https://www.lawfareblog.com/very-quick-thoughts-end-mueller-investigation

This dude is as reliable as a paper straw in a Big Gulp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ben wittes preliminary thoughts
https://www.lawfareblog.com/very-quick-thoughts-end-mueller-investigation

This dude is as reliable as a paper straw in a Big Gulp.

DP. I assume you didn’t actually read what he wrote, because your comment is nonsensical in the context.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ben wittes preliminary thoughts
https://www.lawfareblog.com/very-quick-thoughts-end-mueller-investigation

This dude is as reliable as a paper straw in a Big Gulp.

DP. I assume you didn’t actually read what he wrote, because your comment is nonsensical in the context.

You mean as nonsensical as this witch hunt? You got me. Once a source is burned, I don't wait to see if it will resurrect itself with better judgement.

[Anonymous]

Trump isn't worried about SDNY until 2024. I am sure his ego won't even consider defeat in 2020.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trumpsters ought not to be so cocky since the report has not been released.

Trumpsters also ought not forget SDNY.

Trumpsters also may want to read up on RICO.

I really pray this post ages VERY, VERY well!

Indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ben wittes preliminary thoughts
https://www.lawfareblog.com/very-quick-thoughts-end-mueller-investigation

This dude is as reliable as a paper straw in a Big Gulp.

DP. I assume you didn’t actually read what he wrote, because your comment is nonsensical in the context.

In reality, Wittes has no credibility, except to people who are determined to bring Trump down.
Coincidentally, he was mentioned in this article, published yesterday.....

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-clashed-doj-biased-fisa-source-texts-mccabe-page

Just nine days before the FBI applied for a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to surveil a top Trump campaign aide, bureau officials were battling with a senior Justice Department official who had "continued concerns" about the "possible bias" of a source pivotal to the application, according to internal text messages obtained by Fox News.

The 2016 messages, sent between former FBI lawyer Lisa Page and then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, also reveal that bureau brass circulated at least two anti-Trump blog articles, including a Lawfare blog post sent shortly after Election Day that called Trump possibly "among the major threats to the security of the country."

Another article, sent by Page in July 2016 as the FBI's counterintelligence probe into Russian election interference was kicking off, flatly called Trump a "useful idiot" for Russian President Vladimir Putin. Page told McCabe that then-FBI Director James Comey had "surely" read that piece. Both articles were authored in whole or part by Benjamin Wittes, a Comey friend.

Further, the texts show that on Sept. 12, 2016, Page forwarded to McCabe some "unsolicited comments" calling then-GOP Rep. Trey Gowdy a "total d--k." Gowdy, at the time, was grilling FBI congressional affairs director Jason Herring at a hearing on the FBI's handling of the Clinton email investigation.

But perhaps the most significant Page-McCabe communications made plain the DOJ's worries that the FISA application to surveil Trump aide Carter Page was based on a potentially biased source -- and underscored the FBI's desire to press on.