Terrorist attack going on in Paris right now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lanier said no imminent threat to DC

Um, how would anyone know that? The mark of terrorism is that it's unexpected.

MI5 feared a revenge attack related to or inspired by the killing of Jihadi John.

Did the French kill JJ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lanier said no imminent threat to DC

Um, how would anyone know that? The mark of terrorism is that it's unexpected.

MI5 feared a revenge attack related to or inspired by the killing of Jihadi John.

But they don't know if the attack is related to Jhadi John. It's obvious this attack was well planned based on the scope and magnitude. Jhadi John was killed yesterday. This thing was not planned overnight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lanier said no imminent threat to DC

Um, how would anyone know that? The mark of terrorism is that it's unexpected.

MI5 feared a revenge attack related to or inspired by the killing of Jihadi John.

Did the French kill JJ?

No, we did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:scary. My kids are home so don't want to turn on the TV. DH is going to take them out to dinner (already planned, his night out with them) so I will have TV glued to CNN in just a few. UGH. Hate this.

You are hiding this from the kids?

why?

My 7 and 11 year olds are watching.

Why to you?

b/c I don't hide the ugly side of life from my children

That's why.

Great job on focusing on what's really important here- criticizing someone else's parenting.

Doesn't it really ALL stem from home?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lanier said no imminent threat to DC

Um, how would anyone know that? The mark of terrorism is that it's unexpected.

MI5 feared a revenge attack related to or inspired by the killing of Jihadi John.

But they don't know if the attack is related to Jhadi John. It's obvious this attack was well planned based on the scope and magnitude. Jhadi John was killed yesterday. This thing was not planned overnight.

How difficult is it to walk into a building and shoot people? I'm not sure it takes as much planning as you think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do you use the word terror?

-because it is a terrorist attack?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lanier said no imminent threat to DC

Um, how would anyone know that? The mark of terrorism is that it's unexpected.

MI5 feared a revenge attack related to or inspired by the killing of Jihadi John.

Did the French kill JJ?

No, we did.

Precisely. So why would France anticipate repercussions in Paris?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People on this thread seem a little too giddy and gleeful to have something awful to post about. This voyeuristic horror is sick and pathetic. Seriously, there is something wrong with you.

No, there are a few creeps clearly tickled at maybe getting to say "told you so!" and a few people who are posting updates.

I'm just nauseated that this is happening. Again. Whoever you are: you are a perversion.

Tickled? I am horrified. And equally frustrated at so many who seem surprised by this. Can you imagine those of us who saw it coming, screaming OPEN YOUR EYES, only to be called racists, paranoid, etc? We are horrified and angry as hell. 140+ dead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lanier said no imminent threat to DC

Um, how would anyone know that? The mark of terrorism is that it's unexpected.

MI5 feared a revenge attack related to or inspired by the killing of Jihadi John.

But they don't know if the attack is related to Jhadi John. It's obvious this attack was well planned based on the scope and magnitude. Jhadi John was killed yesterday. This thing was not planned overnight.

How difficult is it to walk into a building and shoot people? I'm not sure it takes as much planning as you think.

This wasn’t just one site. It was several. It took planning to coordinate this attack. It also took planning to get the arms and weapons together and into these locations undetected. It has been in the planning for some time, of that we can be sure.
The revenge for the killing of Jihadi John is being planned now, I would guess.
These are pure evil animals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lanier said no imminent threat to DC

Um, how would anyone know that? The mark of terrorism is that it's unexpected.

MI5 feared a revenge attack related to or inspired by the killing of Jihadi John.

Did the French kill JJ?

No, we did.

Precisely. So why would France anticipate repercussions in Paris?

MI5 is British, as was Jihadi John and his surviving family. France is considered a greater enemy by (some in) Syria.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lanier said no imminent threat to DC

Um, how would anyone know that? The mark of terrorism is that it's unexpected.

MI5 feared a revenge attack related to or inspired by the killing of Jihadi John.

Did the French kill JJ?

No, we did.

Precisely. So why would France anticipate repercussions in Paris?

To the terrorists, it doesn’t matter if it is France, the UK, the US, or any other nation that is our ally. We are all the same to them.
And, this was not a retaliation for JJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The United States has been successful in containing the momentum of ISIS, but more needs to be done to “completely decapitate” their operations, President Obama said in an exclusive interview with ABC News’ Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos.

“I don't think they're gaining strength,” the president told Stephanopoulos in an interview at the White House Thursday. “From the start our goal has been first to contain, and we have contained them. They have not gained ground in Iraq. And in Syria it -- they'll come in, they'll leave.

"But you don't see this systematic march by ISIL across the terrain," he added, using the government's acronym for ISIS.

“What we have not yet been able to do is to completely decapitate their command and control structures. We've made some progress in trying to reduce the flow of foreign fighters,” Obama said. “Part of our goal has to be to recruit more effective Sunni partners in Iraq to really go on offense rather than simply engage in defense.”

Wow. I hadn't realized our strategy was simply defense. Oh God. It's worse than I thought.

Hmm, yes. We have not gone all out against ISIS. Nor should we have.

Loyalty is a beautiful thing.

[Anonymous]

158 dead now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lanier said no imminent threat to DC

Um, how would anyone know that? The mark of terrorism is that it's unexpected.

MI5 feared a revenge attack related to or inspired by the killing of Jihadi John.

But they don't know if the attack is related to Jhadi John. It's obvious this attack was well planned based on the scope and magnitude. Jhadi John was killed yesterday. This thing was not planned overnight.

How difficult is it to walk into a building and shoot people? I'm not sure it takes as much planning as you think.

This wasn’t just one site. It was several. It took planning to coordinate this attack. It also took planning to get the arms and weapons together and into these locations undetected. It has been in the planning for some time, of that we can be sure.
The revenge for the killing of Jihadi John is being planned now, I would guess.
These are pure evil animals.

I don't think it took that much planning and I think they had easy access to weapons. Terrible situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:158 dead now.

at least 5 different locations attacked.