+1. |
This. Really, any sporting hobby that requires time to train, any kind of specialized equipement, and the time and money to travel to events, etc. |
| People are definitely missing the point of "unintentional". The triathlon stuff, a lot of the attachment parenting philosophies, certain dietary habits or restrictions...these are available to the population as a whole, but in this area a large majority of those who have the leisure time, the research time, and the funds to accommodate such things also happen to be wealthy. So, yes, anyone can SAH, make their own baby food, eat gluten-free bagels, train for a half-ironman, extol the virtues of their walkable lifestyle, etc. But the vast, vast majority of people (women especially) who I know who have or do these things have $$$$$. |
|
OK. Who the hell is the thread cop who keeps dropping in to redirect us
"Not quite ..." "You guys are missing the point of this exercise." "Let me explain the assignment again." "Remember, it's UNintentional. UNitentional...." I didn't realize this was a facilitated discussion. Damn. |
Who knew? I have a vitamix (came with the husband 12 years ago), a Sodastream (trying to save a little money and make healthier fizzy drinks) and I never wear make-up. I've never worn foundation or compact powder. I consider myself made up when I have eyeliner, mascara, and lipstick on. |
You're bitter about your obviously-trying-too-hard North Face fleece and Mercedes, right? |
+1 |
I am solid middle class. I have no problem with the topic, but rather the person (people) who keeps reiterating the thread title for us. Like we're children who are missing the point. |
I went to an Ivy League school, and this describes the second and third generation legacies. |
How do you know how much your neighbors have? |
This is untrue...1/2 my family--mom's side is extremely wealthy and the biggest tippers, most generous out there. Some people are just assholes. |
I say this with all seriousness, this is remnant of New England's puritan roots. Read up on Cotton Mather and 17th c. history, the puritans who colonized Massachusetts had no problem with earning money, they saw that as a sign of God's grace, but ostentatious displays of wealth were verboten- hence all the 17th c. portraits of dour men & women in black and gray. You could argue that this aesthetic is a status symbol to those in the know, and therefore is not as virtuous as you might think. It is certainly regional, having spent time around old money families in NYC (as a lowly peon, working events at the Met), those grand old dames were always immaculately coiffed. |
| Carpool lane numbers in the front of cars. |
Produce at the Farmer's Market is often more affordable and because it's local there's less of a carbon footprint. Many are now taking EBT so there goes the status. |
^ what you just described is the posers trying hard to *emulate* the authentic shabby New England elite! No true Brahmin would wear a Black Dog logo, and the LL Bean totes must be at least 40 years old, and worn/stained from having been used on a sailboat. |