Kelly Ripa - just right or too thin?

[Anonymous]

I've seen her in person. She is way too thin. She looks 1000% better in picture and on her TV show (which let us not forget, adds weight).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've seen her in person. She is way too thin. She looks 1000% better in picture and on her TV show (which let us not forget, adds weight).

Agree. I've also seen her in person and it's pretty jarring, she looks emaciated.

I'm a size 0/2 before anyone calls me a jealous hater. She looks ill not fit.

[Anonymous]

The camera adds weight so she probably is thinner in real life

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nanny here- My charge goes to school with Julie Bowen's son and we do playdates often. She is not too thin and looks even better in person. Kelly Ripa on the other hand is disgusting. She needs to gain 20 pounds!!!

Do you live in California? Why you post on a DC site?

[b]




Nanny here- Why do you care why I post here? Many many many nannies on this site are not in fact in DC. This site is well known in the nanny world as a good parenting/nanny site.

As I said before, I don't hang out in bikinis with Julie Bowen. She's always in sweats and is a really nice person... Unlike many of the critical old crows on this thread.

Wow. What a professional you are. Hopefully you get replaced

[Anonymous]

She's done the "what I eat in 24 hours" and it's maybe 1,200 calories. Basically nuts and some leaves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's done the "what I eat in 24 hours" and it's maybe 1,200 calories. Basically nuts and some leaves.

I saw that too. It wasn't quite as bad as Giuliana Rancic's which I think was taken down and scrubbed for being basically Pro-ANA instructions, but it was up there on the line of ok and not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's done the "what I eat in 24 hours" and it's maybe 1,200 calories. Basically nuts and some leaves.

If you’re short that’s about all you can eat. And she’s very short.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Kelly is a great co-host and really enjoy her, but I really think she looked much better when she weighed more. Her face just looks drawn to me, and her arms are so thin. Does anyone else agree?

Always way too thin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's done the "what I eat in 24 hours" and it's maybe 1,200 calories. Basically nuts and some leaves.

If you’re short that’s about all you can eat. And she’s very short.

About all you can eat to look skeletal.

[Anonymous]

Looks like a stick figure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Kelly is a great co-host and really enjoy her, but I really think she looked much better when she weighed more. Her face just looks drawn to me, and her arms are so thin. Does anyone else agree?

Always way too thin.

She was almost chubby and looked great on all my children but that was decades ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've seen her in person. She is way too thin. She looks 1000% better in picture and on her TV show (which let us not forget, adds weight).

Agree. I've also seen her in person and it's pretty jarring, she looks emaciated.

I'm a size 0/2 before anyone calls me a jealous hater. She looks ill not fit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like a stick figure.

You’re just hating on her because you’re jealous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Their children are all absolutely
gorgeous!

[Anonymous]

I watch both Kelly and Mark every day except weekends hardly miss an episode, but yes there's a but wait before I say anything I love the clothes Kelly wears just gorgeous she's gorgeous her children are super beautiful ❤️❤️ and Mark doesn't look bad neither however with that being said okay Kelly I 💕 you girl but with that gorgeous face 20lbs of good eating on you would do great justice just saying be blessed y'all !!