Veterans Day and Indigenous People’s day seem to be about getting five day weeks for everyone not just ES. The justification for moving ES early release to Friday was that Wednesday was disruptive to class flow and teachers reported to the board it was a problem. |
Frisch was pretty unimpressive in the meeting. You can tell he’s not a parent. |
He’s always been unimpressive. |
Says no more than 4 early release days. Does that mean no more ES early release once a month? |
I wondered about that, but ES early releases aren’t included in the calendar the school board votes on. They’re never published on any version of the calendar that I’ve seen. |
I believe they were getting around that by calling them “limited” early release days since they only apply to elementary and not to preschool/pre-K or middle and HS. |
| They will do a 10 year study and then 10 years later do the opposite of what is asked by the parents |
Yes. Very much needed planning time. |
I checked the calendar for next year and there are actually not too many weeks that qualify under point 2. Especially if they continue to divide up the county for which schools have the early release. And some of the days that do qualify, if they do it on Fridays, are right before a Monday holiday or a break. By my count the only qualifying days would be - not counting anything in August or June when they don’t do them: 9/18 10/2 10/9 (Monday 10/12 is a student holiday) 10/23 11/20 (Thanksgiving break starts Weds 11/25) 12/4, 11, and 18 (18 is day before winter break) 1/8 1/15 (Monday 1/18 is MLK day) 2/12 (Monday 2/15 is Presidents’ Day) 2/26 3/5 3/19 (day before spring break) 4/2, 4/9, 4/30 5/7 5/14 (Monday 5/17 is a day off) I count 13 Fridays on days that don’t already have a day off or an early release and aren’t right before a long weekend or break … |
Yep ++++ please vote all of them off the SB. Enough is enough. |
|
Now the school board is floating the idea of removing Veterans Day and IP Day next year and shifting early release to Fridays. At this point, it feels like they’re rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. Families have slogged through a year of chopped‑up weeks, pointless closures, and “professional days” that seem to appear out of thin air - and this is the grand solution?
Let’s be honest: this isn’t meaningful reform. It’s tokenism dressed up as “responsiveness,” a quick political talking point they can wave around while avoiding the real conversation about how dysfunctional the calendar has become. Scrapping two holidays and shuffling early release to Fridays doesn’t fix anything. It’s cosmetic, short‑term, and designed to look like action without actually requiring any. If they want credibility, they need to stop playing calendar whack‑a‑mole and address the structural mess they’ve created. Families deserve a school year that isn’t a patchwork of interruptions. Students deserve instructional time that isn’t constantly carved up. And the board needs to stop pretending that these tiny, performative tweaks count as leadership. |
Yes, they are rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. And also, there was a reason they moved the elementary early release days from Mondays to Wednesdays: Too many staff took the Mondays off. Do they not expect that same problem with Fridays? |
I think the board is stuck with something intensely unpopular, that they made more unpopular, but putting it on Wednesday. The right decision is to get rid of it, but taking no action just builds resentment, so this splits the baby. |
|
If Mondays and Fridays result in too many absences and Wednesdays are too disruptive, then perhaps the existence of ES early release is creating more problems than it’s solving.
More than half the early releases took place during already broken weeks for our school. Perhaps they would have been fine during a clean 5 day week. Although, it’s already been pointed out that it isn’t achievable in November, and will lead to several 4 day weekends. |